100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

A* Essay Plans for Conservatism Politics Pearson Edexcel

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
8
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
06-06-2024
Written in
2023/2024

5 essay plans for conservatism. Each essay plan covers the extent to which it's united on either the state, society, human nature, the economy and pragmatism. Each plan is very detailed. Across the essay plans, there is important detail on both strands and key thinkers. The perfect revision tool!

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
June 6, 2024
Number of pages
8
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+

Subjects

Content preview

CONSERVATISM: Evaluate the extent to which there is tension between different strands of
conservatism on their approach to the economy. (24)

Conservatives seek to conserve what is good in society and only make changes with clear need. It
grows in response to Liberalism and the age of revolution as part of the Enlightenment. Edmund Burke
is renowned as the father of conservatism as we know it today. De ne traditional: committed to
hierarchic and paternalistic values, New Right: a marriage of neo-liberal and neo-
conservative ideas and One Nation: an ideology based on conservative, paternalist
values


P1: Agree:
Capitalism
· All conservatives believe in a capitalist society. They believe it is the best route to the sort of security
that we crave as part of our human nature, owing to our psychological fallibility.
· As they believe in capitalism, it follows that conservatives all believe in the existence of inequality.
· The level of inequality they are prepared to accept varies – one nation conservatives like Disraeli,
Macmillan and Cameron are less happy to accept large inequalities owing to the negative effect on
societal stability that might bring, but they still believe in an unequal society overall.
· With inequality comes a belief in the natural hierarchy of society – something which has been a
feature of conservatism of all kinds throughout its existence.

Free market economics (to an extent)
· Traditional conservatives and neo-liberals believe in the free market – though to differing extents.
· Burke was a supporter of Adam Smith – believing that the free market was the natural organic
state of the economy and that laissez-faire capitalism was a strong way of promoting the concept
of private property.
· Burke’s support of Smith extended to an opposition to the protectionist policies that were popular at
the time.
· Neo-liberalism, as part of the New Right, has free-market ideas at its heart. Neo-liberal
thinkers like Robert Nozick reject the state’s interference in economic activity as a limitation on
freedom and a restriction of the potential of growth. Thatcher’s policies of deregulation of the
City of London are a classic case in point.

Private property
· All conservatives view private property as a vital component of the economy.
· They believe private property provides psychological security to people in society.
· There is disagreement as to how private property does this, however.
· Neo-liberals believe the accumulation of private property reduces individuals’ reliance on the
state – the triumph of an atomistic society. Thatcher’s Right to Buy Policy is a classic example.
· Traditional and one nation conservatives believe that private property gives individuals a stake
in an organic society – it is in our interests to protect and conserve what we have.

P2: Disagree:
Areas of disagreement
Free market v Keynesianism
· This is the greatest area of difference between the two economically.
· The role played by the state in a Keynesian-based economic system is far greater than that played by
the state in a free market – with the government intervening to ensure full employment and the state
owning a large amount of the country’s economic apparatus.
· Taxation could be used to provide the means to produce paternalist policies aimed at a reduction in
inequality, to ensure security and stability.




fi

, · This fundamental difference has seen the Conservative Party change immensely since the emergence
of Thatcher – it broke the One Nation domination seen in the post-war consensus.
· Privatisation, deregulation, disengagement from failing industries, reducing welfare all speak to
the reduction of the role of the state – the “rolling back of the state”.
· For Rand and Nozick, taxation is seen as theft – an unwelcome limitation of liberty.
· Rand argued, as part of her Objectivist approach, that the individual must be free to pursue his
own interests above all – and the free market and small state allows this to happen.
· Nozick wanted a minarchist state – only providing security and internal stability to allow for
successful economic activity by individuals in an atomistic society. Again, the free market underpins
all of this.

Disagreement on doctrinal approach to economic affairs
· Traditional conservatives like Burke may have been supporters of laissez-faire economic thinking, as
suggested above, but Traditional conservatives and one nation conservatives are often seen as only
tepidly supportive of laissez-faire, owing to its doctrinal rigidity, preferring a more pragmatic approach
to economic policy making.
· This led to the 20th century embrace of Keynesianism, which sought reasonable but unspectacular
growth in the economy and allowed the state to place emphasis on protecting and boosting aspects of
the economy as it saw t at the time – see FDR’s New Deal in USA and rise in paternalistic policies of
post-war Conservative governments in the UK.
· Neo-liberalism by contrast is xed in its view that rolling back the state is key – witness Liz Truss’s
eagerness to reduce taxation on her arrival in Downing Street.
· Neo-liberalism is a much more radical outlook, underpinned by a positive belief in our human nature
and a belief that we can be exceptional.

P3: evaluative: agree only to a limited extent





fi fi
$4.80
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
ellieplumberz

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
ellieplumberz Oxford University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
13
Last sold
2 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions