100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Week 2 revision exam notes - organisation of labour papers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
25-05-2024
Written in
2023/2024

3 papers eg african miracle paper, jobs of the world paper and one more

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
May 25, 2024
Number of pages
3
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Oriana
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Economic Development and the Organization of Labour: Jobs of the World Project Bandiera

Aim How labour organisation (allocation/nature of jobs) varies btwn countries at different stages of development
Context Setting: Global data
Motivati Labour is the sole endowment of the poor + main factor of production = Understanding whether labour is employed
on efficiently is key to understanding poverty
Data Assembled new data set: Jobs of the World Data built from (IPUMS) & Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)
 IPMUS: population Censuses covering nearly 100 countries
 DHA: Fertility/women's health, hh assets, employment (m&f) and includes SSA
Variables:
 JWD variables: reports person working, work remuneration, and whether self-employed/wage work
 Work defined: any form of productive activity regardless of whether income generated
 Wealth defined: asset index  ownership of non-productive assets, dwelling qual etc
Results Result 1: Marketisation of work; labour moves from unpaid HH work to paid market work  wealth and gender
determine labor allocation but differences by gender are larger than differences by wealth.
- Fig 4: Wealth: In lower income countries, share of ppl in (unpaid) work largest in poorest; In high-income
countries share of ppl in (mainly paid) work largest in high-income group (unpaid work disappears)
- Fig ¾: gender matters more than wealth in variation in paid work = men specialise in paid market work while
poor women take up paid jobs at a lower rate and ’disappear’ from the measured labor force. = U shape is
driven by women = increase in paid work slowly bc still worked more in HH
Result 2: Emergence of firms as organising unit of work pulling workers out of self-employed work at low levels of
development to paid work in firms at higher level of development bc private firms that employ wage workers
 Fig 7 Mainly private firms creating wage jobs and so fig 6  shift from unpaid home production to market
happens gradually
 Fig 8  shift from agriculture into manufacturing/services across GDP
 Fig 10: lowest educational groups experiencing the larger shifts into wage work
 Fig 12: poorest in poor countries are the most likely to work - out of necessity and in the worst types of jobs.
Result 3: Increasing specialisation and creation of ’new’ jobs within firms increase w development bc larger
number of specialised occupations available but comes with occupational segregation by gender
- Firms use more tech/management practices = division of labor and a higher degree of specialisation than
what is possible among self-employed workers = boost productivity
- Fig 13: Panel 1: workforce shift out of agriculture into high skilled groups as countries get richer but Panel
2/3: work is gendered in richer countries: women work more in services and men more in crafts.
- Fig 14: richest countries have more occupation types than poorest + specialisation among employees occurs
for both gender but faster for men (Figure 14b).
- Fig 17 - countries become richer, care tasks are increasingly taken on by women.
Reason for gender misallocation:
- Assessed Interventions include vocational training, cash transfers mostly successful in countries w/ higher
share of women in paid work  Social norms more important than indv barrier & not due to labour market
wide factors; no corr btwn results and share of men in paid work
Policy Interventions like training is only effective when womens participation is already high and doesn’t address social
implicati norms
ons address social norms to improve labour allocation eg via Information campaigns to overcome self-stabilising norms
by people wont adhere to norm if they knew the real preferences of others
 Policies to improve gender allocation shouldn’t treat both genders equally + reinforce traditional gender
roles eg Parental leave policies often favor mothers with longer paid leave, creating financial incentives for
$6.94
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
karishmaquessou

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
karishmaquessou London School of Economics
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
5
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions