100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Lecture 6

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
8
Uploaded on
21-02-2019
Written in
2017/2018

HC6 van Clinical Trials and Clinical Development

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 21, 2019
Number of pages
8
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Unknown
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Lecture 6 Friday morning

IRB/IEC – Investigator – Sponsor

IRB/IEC
IRB & IEC are different but have the same function, the difference is geography

IRB – US = legal power – you can end up in prison
IEC – EU & the rest of the world = no legal power just favourable opinion

But ICH says, you need a favourable opinion ICH is law so it ends up the same -> always
positive opinion/approval

AIEC = Accredited Ethics Committee
METC = Medisch Etische Toetsings Commissie

IEC has one job, to protect the right, safety & well-being of the subjects
-Special attention for trials that include vulnerable subject
-This when the outcome is of importance for the subjects/that population & the trial cannot
be done without them

IRB/IEC tasks
-They do benefit risk analysis for the subjects
-Reviewing and approving/providing favourable or non-favourable opinion on
-Trial protocol
-Suitability of the investigator
-Suitability of the facilities
-Methods and material to be used in obtaining and documenting informed consent of
the trial subjects

The documents they need for analysis are
-Protocol
-ICF + PIF (Patient Information Form)
-CV PI (Principal Investigator) -> not for approval
-IB -> not for approval it is a tool
-Letter with a statement from the BoD with their approval and a statement that they are up
to it
-All information written to subject, diaries/advertisements
-ABR = Algemeen Beoordelings- en Registratieformulier
-Insurance certificate for the trial, that the insurance covers for the number of patients you
enrol and the amount of the insurance must be high enough

Amendment to protocol has to be approved by IEC, except when in immediate hazard, to
protect the safety, rights and wellbeing of the subject.

IRB/IEC opinion -> see slide
-4 options


1

, -Approval/favourable opinion
-Modifications required prior to approval
-Disapproval/negative opinion
-Termination/suspension of prior given approval
th
-> 5 option; conditional approval; life up to conditions then chairman will sign and approve
without a 2nd round

IRB/IEC responsibilities
-Consider qualifications
-Continuously review each ongoing trial, but at least once per year
-Determine ethical aspects and applicable regulations in case of trials in emergency
situations
-Review payments to subjects

IRB/IEC composition
-At least five members
-At least 1 with non-scientific interest
-At least 1 who is independent of the institution/site

IRB/IEC Voting
-Only members who actually participate in the review and discussion vote
-Investigator may provide information on the trial but should not participate in voting

IRB/IEC Obligations
-Perform funcitons according to written operating procedures
-Maintain written records of activities and minutes of meetings
-Comply with GCP and applicable regulatory requirements

IEC Notifications
IEC should notify the investigator concerning:
-Its trial related decisions
-The reasons for its decisions
-Procedures for appeal of its decisions

Notification to IRB/IEC
Investigator should promptly report to IEC:
-Deviations from protocol to eliminate immediate hazard
-Changes increasing the risks to subjects
-All adverse drug reactions ADR that are both serious and unexpected
-New information that may affect adversely the safety of subjects or conduct of trial

EuCTD: ECs
-For multi-center trials only one single EC opinion for each participating Member State
-Ethics committee should have member with expertise in relevant disease and patient
population or seek advice from expert
-EC shall consider the relevance of a clinical trial and the anticipated benefits and risks




2
$3.62
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
annelotte444

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
annelotte444 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
4
Documents
19
Last sold
2 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions