100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Unit #8: Authority and Expertise

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Uploaded on
23-04-2024
Written in
2023/2024

The text discusses the appropriate use of authority and expertise when evaluating claims. It emphasizes the importance of skepticism and critical thinking when faced with expert advice. The text also highlights the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority and provides several criteria for determining whether an appeal to authority is appropriate or not. The text further explains the concept of an appropriate domain of expertise, stating that certain subjective areas like ethics and aesthetics are excluded from expertise. It also mentions the need for consensus among experts in a particular field and the importance of relevant competence. The text discusses bias and conflicts of interest, stating that funding from a specific source does not necessarily discount an expert's claim, but it is important to consider potential biases. Examples are provided to illustrate inappropriate appeals to authority, such as relying on a celebrity endorsement or an unsupported claim from a non-credible source. The text distinguishes between authoritative and non-authoritative sources, highlighting the importance of credible, corroborated, and sanctioned information. It warns against relying on summary sources, social media posts, or self-published documents. The text discusses the challenges of internet research, including the ease of finding information but also the need to verify sources and avoid click-bait. Wikipedia is mentioned as a preliminary source of information, but caution is advised as the system is not perfect and some quality information may be excluded or dubious information included. Peer review is highlighted as an important process for evaluating the authority and quality of information. Different types of peer-reviewed publications are explained, such as abstracts and review articles. The text acknowledges that news reporting is a business and warns against media bias. It cautions against confirmation bias and the formation of information bubbles. Overall, the text provides guidance on how to evaluate and verify information from experts, sources, and media outlets, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking, skepticism, and seeking authoritative and credible sources.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 23, 2024
Number of pages
5
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Brommage
Contains
All classes
$7.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
baileyharvey

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12
-
11 2024
$ 86.59 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
baileyharvey Sam Houston State University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
23
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions