100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Russia: Social Change

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
20-03-2024
Written in
2023/2024

A concise overview of the essential information in the topic

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
March 20, 2024
Number of pages
3
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Russian Famine of 1891-92 (began along Volga + spread to Urals + Black Sea What the famine told us about the Impact of Industrialisation
Causes (weather) extent to which life changed in Russia
 Weather, dry autumn, very cold but didn’t snow (seeds unprotected from frost). Volga flooded + lack of snow
by 1891?
caused water to freeze, killing more seeds. Seeds that weren’t killed blown away via windy spring. Long dry
summer, no rain for over 100 days (all food died). All this lead to famine where over 500k people died by 1892  Industrialisation: limited extent of
Other causes industrialisation
 Other causes: Peasants used medieval tech, rarely had modern tech or fertilisers.
 Basic railway system couldn’t redistribute grain.  Agriculture: Lack of modernisation,
 Affected area main place of communal land distribution, peasants had no incentive to improve land/mechanise, still largely agrarian economy
but incentive to produce as many children as possible.
 Main blame on govt, refused to use work famine (golod), called it poor harvest (neurozhai) + stopped papers
reporting on it. Grain exports didn’t stop until mid-August + month’s warning for merchants so quickly exported  The Church: Lack of change, still
their reserves. Vyshnegradsky opposed ban, seen as main cause as his policy to + consumer taxes to force high level of control over peasants
peasants to sell their grain (even Russian capitalists thought was too harsh). Govt contributed to famine directly
via conscription of peasant sons, sending taxmen to seize livestock when grain ran out + enforcing redemption
 Social divisions + hierarchy:
payments
Relief efforts Created stronger demand for
 Nov 17th 1891, govt asked people to form voluntary anti-famine organisations national govt (which could respond
 Leo Tolstoy (most famous volunteer) blamed Tsar + Orthodox church for famine, church banned peasants taking to famine quicker), famine only
his donations as had excommunicated him. affected peasants, partial loss of
 Zemstva got 150M roubles from govt, but only allowed to give to peasants who could pay them back (least needy) faith in Tsar, nobles loss of support
 Starving Peasants forced to eat raw donated flour + ‘famine bread’ (mix of moss, goosefoot, bark and husks) for Tsar.
 Feb 1892 govt bought 30k Kyrgyz horses so fields could be ploughed.


Problems that hindered economic growth + Socio-economic changes that promoted Positive/Negative/No Change in Rural economy between 1861 and 1904
rising living standards economic growth + improved living standards No change Positive change Negative change
Still used three-course crop rotation Decline in traditional + patriarchal Heavy burden of redemption
system (slowly starting to use multi- world. Money economy entering payments
course crop rotation). rural areas. Sources of income Growing land hunger (arable land
Agrarian-based up until WW1 + becoming more diverse as peasants per household fell from 13.1 to 10.4
predominately peasant country. engaged in more non-farming work. hectares between 1877 and 1905)
Russia’s towns + cities remained Many broke from old extended As pop rose + indirect taxes of mass
peasant in social composition + family to set up new farms, shifted consumer goods meant peasants
character (80% pop in 1897) Most power from older to younger got poorer
workers either migrant peasants or peasants.
children of such.
Status of young + literate peasants
Peasant culture remained rose, as could understand more
conservative modern technologies, threatened
Peasants still poor by European mir (as was patriarchal + age
standards, infant mortality based).
remained highest in Europe. Grain production was growing at a
Central Russia, backwards farming faster rate than pop + peasants
methods + continued domination selling larger proportion of income.
by gentry meant hard for peasants More peasants becoming wealthier
to support themselves on a seven (kulaks).
acre plot. Many fell into debt, sent Grain production rose 3.1%/yr
children to work in towns. Lived on between 1885 and 1914
edge of existence Highest living standards around
central Russia, where commercial
farming taken root in 18th Century
$6.18
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
HumanitiesHelper

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
HumanitiesHelper D\'overbroecks Sixth Form
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
20
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions