Human Rights- Exam questions with 100% correct answers

Assess the extent to which the MDGs were successful (12) intro + 3 main points correct answersintro- MDGs were set of 8 goals based on human rights development created by UN , whether were success or not unclear with large differences between countries -one of most successful was goal 2 universal primary education, high overall enrolment, shows clear success e.g. Tanzania where by 2010 nationwide enrolment up to 95% from 59% in 2000, however this initial success of increased education participation lead to some problems, e.g. lack of resources to deal with increased class sizes, will likely decrease educational quality and so question what benefits will actually be received by children, shows how success unlikely to continue -another MDGs with varying success is improving maternal health/children mortality rates (goals 4 + 5), countries such as Nepal has been some success with free childbirth for all mothers from development fund, however can't be said to be universal e.g. in Zimbabwe these have declined, have corrupt government + lack of political stability which will play large role in them meeting their MDGs, could show how MDGs would never be universally successful due to individual countries own circumstances -can also be seen in reducing extreme poverty, although has reduce by 56%, china accounts for 500 million of this putting statistic into question, e.g. in Afghanistan a country in midst of conflict, 80% population still drink contaminated water sources. another example how MDGs never going to be completely successful due to not recognising other factors, as Paul Collier said, 'we got to recognise the complexity' not just poverty alone, MDGs successful in some areas but not all. Evaluate 'some developments improve human rights while others have negative environmental/cultural impacts' (20) correct answers Explain reasons why national sovereignty poses a problem in countries intervening in human rights abuses (6) correct answers-national sovereignty describes the idea by which each nation has a right to govern itself without interference from other nations, with this being a principle within international law. However due to a number of cases involving instances of governments abusing the rights of their own people, such as torture and imprisonment, this has added weight to the principle of the responsibility to protect, meaning countries are increasingly having to intervene with this then creating tensions between the two principles. -example could be said to be that of zimbabwe... Evaluate importance both international law + international agreement in protecting human rights (20) correct answersIntro- number agreements made, both between certain