AQA A Level Psychology Social Influence Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass

AQA A Level Psychology Social Influence Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass State the definition of conformity - Answer-An individual is said to be conforming if they choose a course of action that is favoured by the majority of the group members. State and explain the three types of conformity - Answer-Compliance - Individuals follow what the group is doing in order to be accepted or to fit in, even if there personal views may differ to the one they are portraying. This will not chance their underlying attitude towards something. (Asch) Internalisation - This involves both public and private attitudes and is where the individual may believe that the groups view, after close inspection, is correct and theirs is wrong. This leads them to changing their public and private view towards something in order to be correct. This is the deepest level of conformity and becomes a permanent attitude. (Sherif's Autokinetic) Identification - The individuals attitudes both private and publicly will change but in this case only for a temporary amount of time and also is in order to fit in and be liked, essentially it is a mix of compliance and internalisation. (Zimbardo) There are two explanations for conformity, outline and explain them - Answer-Normative Social Influence - This is where people go along with a majority in order to feel that they fit in and not be ridiculed for having a different opinion to everyone else. Informational Social Influence - Occurs when an individual accepts information from the majority as they see them as experts or someone with more understanding of a particular subject. This is done in order to be correct. Outline and evaluate a study into informational social influence - Answer-Jenness setup an ambiguous situation where participants were asked individually to estimate how many beans were in a glass bottle they were shown. This was recorded and participants were then put in a room with a group of people and asked as a group to come to an estimate. Again they were asked individually if they would like to change their original estimate, and nearly all of them decided they would like to change. This shows that most of them went through informational social influence where they conformed with a group in order to be correct. :) - Unlike other research into conformity there is no deceiving so it is ethically sound :( - Doesn't give us any insight into non ambiguous situations where conformity occurs Outline and evaluate a study into Normative social influence - Answer-Asch conducted a lab experiment where 50 male students where individually the participants were put in a room with 7 confederates and took part in a 'vision test'. The confederates were told before hand to answer wrongly for every task. They were shown a line and then followed 3 lines on a separate card, named A, B and C. They had to match which from A, B and C matched with the original line they were shown. Asch measure the times that participants conformed with the majority and found that around 1/3rd conformed. Over the 12 critical trials 75% conformed at least once, compared to less than 1% in the control group. When interviewed after and asked why they conformed they stated that they wanted to fit in and not be ridiculed by the group. :( - Asch used a biased sample of only males, of which all were students, meaning it lacks population validity and in turn the findings into normative social influence cant be easily generalised to the population :( - Asch used a task where the participants had to judge line lengths but realistically when do we naturally come across a situation like this. This means that the study lacks ecological validity and cannot be generalised to other situations State and explain each factor that affects levels of conformity - Answer-Asch conducted his research with many different variations and found which affected conformity. Group Size - Asch found that when the majority consisted of just one or two confederates then there was very little conformity. However when there was three then the conforming responses jumped up to around 30%. Further increases did not make a difference in levels of conformity, thus Campbell suggested that group size may have a different effect based on what type of conformity is occurring. For example if there is no correct answer and the individual wants to fit in then the larger the majority the more