100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

COC Questions and CORRECT Answers 2024 Update

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-02-2024
Written in
2023/2024

states that each required member of the Cancer Committee must attend 75% of the meetings per Program Standards Manual 2012 Version 1.2.1. (This percentage had been 50% in prior versions of the Program Standards Manual, Versions 1.1 and 1.2.) - Standard 1.3 states that the required percentage of patients accrued to cancer-related clinical trials each year is determined by the facility's cancer program category. - Standard 1.9 states that all staff must attend one educational program other than cancer conferences - Standard 1.11 To receive commendation, ? requires that the cancer committee develop and distribute a report on either patient outcomes or on program outcomes on an annual basis. - Standard 1.12 requires that the cancer committee develop and distribute an annual report on either patient outcomes or on program outcomes. - Standard 1.12 The standard relates to the use of CAP protocols in reporting required data elements in pathology reports for surgically treated patients. - Standard 2.1. states that the CAP protocol must be used to report required data items on 90% of eligible pathology reports. - Standard 2.1 requires that oncology nursing care be provided by nurses with specialized knowledge and skills. Oncology nurse certification, while not required, is strongly encouraged. - Standard 2.2 requires that the competency of oncology nurses be evaluated on an annual basis (yearly). - Standard 2.2 the submission window for all 2013 cases to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) opens January 1, 2015 and closes January 31, 2015 (due by midnight Central time). - Per Standard 5.6 states that resubmitted data starting from January 1, 2003 forward must meet the established quality criteria and resubmission deadline specified in the Call for Data. - Standard 5.6 states the quality improvement coordinator reports annually to the cancer committee. The standard also indicates a cancer registrar who is abstracting cases cannot be selected to fulfill this role. - Standard 1.2 states within the paragraph under Cancer Registry Quality Coordinator that a cancer registrar who is abstracting can be selected to fill this role. The standard also indicates that the Cancer Registry Quality Coordinator uses the registry data as a basis to monitor the quality of patient care. - Standard 1.2 states that goals are not to be a restatement of a CoC standard because compliance with a standard is required. While new programmatic and clinical goals are to be established annually, these goals do not need to be completed within the year and may be carried forward into the next year. - Standard 1.5 states the cancer committee must establish, implement, and monitor at least one clinical goal related to cancer care annually. - Standard 1.5 states that activities related to goals do not have to be completed each year, but a report of activities related to those goals must be documented in the cancer committee minutes at least twice a year. - Standard 1.5 requires that the cancer committee annually establish and implement a plan to evaluate the cancer registry data. - Standard 1.6 states that community outreach programs (prevention or screening/early detection) must be monitored and reported to the cancer committee annually. - Standard 1.8

Show more Read less
Institution
COC
Course
COC









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
COC
Course
COC

Document information

Uploaded on
February 20, 2024
Number of pages
10
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
MGRADES Stanford University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1113
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
103
Documents
68972
Last sold
10 hours ago
MGRADES (Stanford Top Brains)

Welcome to MGRADES Exams, practices and Study materials Just think of me as the plug you will refer to your friends Me and my team will always make sure you get the best value from the exams markets. I offer the best study and exam materials for a wide range of courses and units. Make your study sessions more efficient and effective. Dive in and discover all you need to excel in your academic journey!

3.8

177 reviews

5
75
4
31
3
47
2
9
1
15

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions