Solution Manual for McGraw-Hill’s Essentials of Federal Taxation 2024 Edition, 15th Edition By Brian Spilker

Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 1 Chapter 1 An Introduction to Tax SOLUTIONS MANUAL Discussion Questions (1) [LO 1] Jessica’s friend Zachary once stated that he couldn’t understand why someone would take a tax course. Why is this a rather naïve view? Taxes are a part of everyday life and have a financial effect on many of the major personal decisions that individuals face (e.g., investment decisions, evaluating alternative job offers, saving for education expenses, gift or estate planning, etc.). (2) [LO 1] What are some aspects of business that require knowledge of taxation? What are some aspects of personal finance that require knowledge of taxation? Taxes play an important role in fundamental business decisions such as the following: • What organizational form should a business use? • Where should the business locate? • How should business acquisitions be structured? • How should the business compensate employees? • What is the appropriate mix of debt and equity for the business? • Should the business rent or own its equipment and property? • How should the business distribute profits to its owners? One must consider all transaction costs (including taxes) to evaluate the merits of a transaction. Common personal financial decisions that taxes influence include: choosing investments, retirement planning, choosing to rent or buy a home, evaluating alternative job offers, saving for education expenses, and doing gift or estate planning. (3) [LO 1] Describe some ways in which taxes affect the political process in the United States. U.S. presidential candidates often distinguish themselves from their opponents based upon their tax rhetoric. Likewise, the major political parties generally have very diverse views of the appropriate way to tax the public. Determining who is taxed, what is taxed, and how much is taxed are difficult questions. Voters must have a basic understanding of taxes to evaluate the merits of alternative tax Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 2 proposals offered by opposing political candidates and their political parties. (4) [LO 2] Courtney recently received a speeding ticket on her way to the university. Her fine was $200. Is this considered a tax? Why or why not? The $200 speeding ticket is not considered a tax. Instead, it is considered a fine or penalty. Taxes differ from fines and penalties because taxes are not intended to punish or prevent illegal behavior. (5) [LO 2] Marlon and Latoya recently started building a house. They had to pay $300 to the county government for a building permit. Is the $300 payment a tax? Why or why not? The building permit is not considered a tax because $300 payment is directly linked to a benefit that they received (i.e., the ability to build a house). (6) [LO 2] To help pay for the city’s new stadium, the city of Birmingham recently enacted a 1 percent surcharge on hotel rooms. Is this a tax? Why or why not? The 1 percent surcharge is a tax. The 1 percent surcharge is an earmarked tax – i.e., collected for a specific purpose. The surcharge is considered a tax because the tax payments made by taxpayers do not directly relate to the specific benefit received by the taxpayers. (7) [LO 2] As noted in Example 1-2, tolls, parking meter fees, and annual licensing fees are not considered taxes. Can you identify other fees that are similar? There are several possible answers to this question. Some common examples include entrance fees to national parks, tag fees paid to local/state government for automobiles, boats, etc. (8) [LO 2] If the general objective of our tax system is to raise revenue, why does the income tax allow deductions for charitable contributions and retirement plan contributions? In addition to the general objective of raising revenue, Congress uses the federal tax system to encourage certain behavior and discourage other behavior. The charitable contribution deduction is intended to encourage taxpayers to support the initiatives of charitable organizations, whereas deductions for retirement contributions are intended to encourage retirement savings. Another objective of the tax system is to redistribute wealth. (9) [LO 2] One common argument for imposing so-called sin taxes is the social goal of reducing demand for such products. Using cigarettes as an example, is there a Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 3 segment of the population that might be sensitive to price and for whom high taxes might discourage purchases? The most obvious segment sensitive to price may be teenagers and younger adults that typically have less disposable income, although price sensitivity or elasticity will vary by taxpayer. (10) [LO 3] Dontae stated that he didn’t want to earn any more money because it would “put him in a higher tax bracket.” What is wrong with Dontae’s reasoning? Although earning additional taxable income may increase Dontae’s marginal tax rate (i.e., put him in a higher tax bracket), the additional income earned does not affect the taxes that Dontae will pay on his existing income. Moving to a higher tax bracket simply means that Dontae will pay a higher tax rate on the additional income earned (not on the income that he already has). (11) [LO 3] Describe the three different tax rates discussed in the chapter and how taxpayers might use them. The marginal tax rate is the tax rate that applies to the taxpayer’s additional taxable income or deductions that the taxpayer is evaluating in a decision. Specifically, Δ ( ) Δ ( ) Tax NewTotalTax OldTotalT M ax TaxableIncome N l argin n al o Tax ewTaxab eI c me OldTaxableIncom Rate e − − = = The marginal tax rate is particularly useful in tax planning because it represents the rate of taxation or savings that would apply to additional taxable income or tax deductions. The average tax rate represents the taxpayer’s average level of taxation on each dollar of taxable income. Specifically, Average Tax Rate = TotalTax TaxableIncome The average tax rate is often used in budgeting tax expense as a portion of income (i.e., what percent of taxable income earned is paid in tax). The effective tax rate represents the taxpayer’s average rate of taxation on each dollar of total income (i.e., taxable and nontaxable income). Specifically, Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 4 Effective Tax Rate = Total Tax Total Income The effective tax rate provides a depiction of a taxpayer’s tax burden because it depicts the taxpayer’s total tax paid as a ratio of the sum of both taxable and nontaxable income earned. (12) [LO 3] Which is a more appropriate tax rate to use to compare taxpayers’ tax burdens – the average or the effective tax rate? Why? Relative to the average tax rate, the effective tax rate provides a better depiction of a taxpayer’s tax burden because it depicts the taxpayer’s total tax paid as a ratio of the sum of both taxable and nontaxable income earned. (13) [LO 3] Describe the differences between a proportional, progressive, and regressive tax rate structure. A proportional (flat) tax rate structure imposes a constant tax rate throughout the tax base. In other words, as the tax base increases, the taxes paid increases, but the marginal tax rate remains constant. Because the marginal tax rate is constant across all levels of the tax base, the average tax rate remains constant across the tax base and always equals the marginal tax rate. Common examples of proportional taxes include sales taxes and excise taxes (i.e., taxes based on quantity such as gallons of gas purchased). A progressive tax rate structure imposes an increasing marginal tax rate as the tax base increases. In other words, as the tax base increases, both the marginal tax rate and the taxes paid increase. Common examples of progressive tax rate structures include federal and most state income taxes and federal estate and gift taxes. A regressive tax rate structure imposes a decreasing marginal tax rate as the tax base increases. In other words, as the tax base increases, the taxes paid increases, but the marginal tax rate decreases. Regressive tax rate structures are not common. In the United States, the Social Security tax and the federal employment tax employ a regressive tax rate structure. However, there are other regressive taxes when the tax is viewed in terms of effective tax rates. For example, a sales tax by definition is a proportional tax – i.e., as taxable purchases increase, the sales tax rate (i.e., the marginal tax rate) remains constant. Nonetheless, when you consider that the proportion of your total income spent on taxable purchases likely decreases as your total income increases, you can see the sale tax as a regressive tax. (14) [LO 3] Arnold and Lilly recently had a discussion about whether a sales tax is a proportional tax or a regressive tax. Arnold argued that a sales tax is regressive. Lilly countered that the sales tax is a flat tax. Who was correct? Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 5 Arnold and Lilly were both correct. A sales tax by definition is a proportional tax – i.e., as taxable purchases increase, the sales tax rate (i.e., the marginal tax rate) remains constant. For this reason, Arnold was correct. Nonetheless, when you consider that the proportion of one’s total income spent on taxable purchases likely decreases as total income increases, the sales tax may be considered a regressive tax. A good example of this is food. Although higher-income taxpayers may pay more for food than lower-income taxpayers, higher-income taxpayers spend a smaller percentage of their income on food—this is why many states exempt food from the sales tax base—because of its regressive nature. For this reason, Lilly was correct. (15) [LO 4] Which is the largest tax collected by the U.S. government? What types of taxpayers are subject to this tax? The federal income tax is the largest tax collected by the U.S. government. Currently, federal income taxes are levied on individuals, corporations, estates, and trusts. (16) [LO 4] What is the tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes for an employee or employer? What is the tax base for Social Security and Medicare taxes for a self-employed individual? Is the self-employment tax in addition to or in lieu of federal income tax? Employee wages is the tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes. Net earnings from self-employment is the tax base for the self-employment tax. The self-employment tax is in addition to the federal income tax. The same is true for employment taxes—they are in addition to the federal income tax. (17) [LO 4] What are unemployment taxes? Employers are required to pay federal and state unemployment taxes, which fund temporary unemployment benefits for individuals terminated from their jobs without cause. The tax base for the unemployment taxes is wages or salary. (18) [LO 4] What is the distinguishing feature of an excise tax? Excise taxes differ from other taxes in that the tax base on excise taxes is typically based on the quantity of an item or service purchased. The federal government imposes a number of excise taxes on goods such as alcohol, diesel fuel, gasoline, tobacco products and services such as telephone services. In addition, states also often impose excise taxes on these same items. Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 6 (19) [LO 4] What are some of the taxes that currently are unique to state and local governments? What are some of the taxes that the federal, state, and local governments each utilize? The sales, use, and property (personal, real, intangible) taxes are unique to state and local governments. Taxes that are common among the federal, state, and local governments include income taxes, excise taxes, and estate and gift taxes. (20) [LO 4] The state of Georgia recently increased its tax on a pack of cigarettes by $2. What type of tax is this? Why might Georgia choose this type of tax? The cigarette tax is both considered an excise tax (i.e., a tax based on quantity purchased) and a “sin” tax (i.e., a tax on goods that are deemed to be socially undesirable). Georgia may choose this type of tax to discourage smoking and because sin taxes are often viewed as acceptable ways of increasing tax revenues. (21) [LO 4] What is the difference between a sales tax and a use tax? The tax base for sales taxes is retail sales of goods (and some services). The tax base for the use tax is the retail price of goods owned, possessed or consumed within a state that were not purchased within the state (e.g., goods purchased over the internet). The prevalence of the use tax has significantly declined since economic nexus for sales taxes was found to be constitutional (see State and Local Taxes chapter for a discussion). (22) [LO 4] What is an ad valorem tax? Name an example of this type of tax. An ad valorem tax is a tax based on the fair market value of property. Real and personal property taxes are examples of ad valorem taxes. (23) [LO 4] What are the differences between an explicit and an implicit tax? An explicit tax is a tax that is directly imposed by a government unit and easily quantified. Implicit taxes are the reduced rates of pretax return that a tax-favored asset produces (e.g., the lower pretax rate of return earned by tax exempt municipal bonds). Although implicit taxes are real and equally important in understanding our tax system, they are difficult to quantify. (24) [LO 4] When we calculate average and effective tax rates, do we consider implicit taxes? What effect does this have on taxpayers’ perception of equity? Implicit taxes are very difficult to quantify and thus, are generally not considered when calculating average and effective tax rates. Since implicit taxes are ignored in these calculations, taxpayers may conclude that groups of taxpayers investing Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 7 in tax advantaged assets (subject to implicit tax) do not pay their fair share of tax as represented by a low effective tax rate. (25) [LO 4] Benjamin recently bought a truck in Alabama for his business in Georgia. What different types of federal and state taxes may affect this transaction? Benjamin will have to pay state sales tax in Alabama for the truck purchased. However, some states only charge sales tax when the purchased vehicle is registered. Assuming Alabama sales tax was charged, when the vehicle is registered in Georgia, Benjamin will have to pay use tax on the purchase at a rate representing any difference in the Alabama sales tax rate and the Georgia use tax rate. Benjamin will also have to pay personal property tax annually on the truck. Finally, since the vehicle is used in Benjamin’s business, he will be able to depreciate the truck for federal income tax purposes. (26) [LO 5] Kobe strongly dislikes SUVs and is appalled that so many are on the road. He proposes to eliminate the federal income tax and replace it with a $50,000 annual tax per SUV. Based on the number of SUVs currently owned in the United States, he estimates the tax will generate exactly the amount of tax revenue currently collected from the income tax. What is wrong with Kobe’s proposal? What type of forecasting is Kobe likely using? Kobe’s forecast is based on static forecasting (i.e., he is ignoring how taxpayers may alter their activities in response to the tax law change). Given that taxpayers are likely to substitute purchases of other vehicles for SUVs (i.e., the substitution effect), Kobe’s proposal is likely to result in a large discrepancy in projected and actual tax revenues since taxpayers will likely purchase fewer SUVs that are subject to the tax. (27) [LO 5] What is the difference between the income and substitution effects? For which types of taxpayers is the income effect more likely descriptive? For which types of taxpayers is the substitution effect more likely descriptive? The income effect predicts that when taxpayers are taxed more (e.g., tax rate increases from 22 to 24 percent), they will work harder to generate the same after-tax dollars. The substitution effect predicts that when taxpayers are taxed more, they will substitute nontaxable activities (e.g., leisure activities) for taxable activities because the marginal value of taxable activities has decreased. The income effect is likely to be more descriptive for taxpayers with insufficient income to meet their necessities, etc. for their desired standard of living. The substitution effect is likely to be more descriptive for taxpayers with sufficient income to meet their necessities and to sustain their desired standard of living. Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 8 (28) [LO 5] What is the difference between horizontal and vertical equity? How do tax preferences affect people’s view of horizontal equity? Horizontal equity means that two taxpayers in similar situations pay the same tax. Vertical equity is achieved when taxpayers with greater ability to pay tax, pay more tax relative to taxpayers with a lesser ability to pay tax. One can view vertical equity in terms of tax dollars paid or in terms of tax rates. Governmental units provide tax preferences for a variety of reasons – e.g., encourage investment, social objectives, etc. For example, a deduction for mortgage interest paid which encourages home ownership. Whether one views these tax preferences as appropriate or not, greatly influences whether one considers a tax system to be fair in general and specifically, horizontally equitable. Specifically, if one views a tax preference as being inappropriate, this would adversely affect one’s view of horizontal equity. (29) [LO 3, LO 5] Montel argues that a flat income tax rate system is vertically equitable. Oprah argues that a progressive tax rate structure is vertically equitable. How do their arguments differ? Who is correct? Vertical equity is achieved when taxpayers with greater ability to pay tax, pay more tax relative to taxpayers with a lesser ability to pay tax. One can view vertical equity in terms of tax dollars paid or in terms of tax rates. Proponents of a flat income tax or sales tax (i.e., proportional tax rate structures) are more likely to argue that vertical equity is achieved when taxpayers with a greater ability to pay tax, pay more in tax dollars. Proponents of a progressive tax system are more likely to argue that taxpayers with a greater ability to pay should be subject to a higher tax rate. This view is based upon the argument that the relative burden of a flat tax rate decreases as a taxpayer’s income (e.g., disposable income) increases. Which is the correct answer? There is no correct answer. Nonetheless, many feel very strongly regarding one view or the other. (30) [LO 3, LO 5] Discuss why evaluating vertical equity simply based on tax rate structure may be less than optimal. Although tax rate structures can be used, in part, to assess vertical equity, focusing on the tax rate structure solely ignores the role that the tax base plays in determining vertical equity. Indeed, focusing on the tax rate structure in evaluating a tax system is appropriate only if the tax base chosen (e.g., taxable income, purchases, property owned, etc.) accurately portrays a taxpayer’s ability to pay. This can be a rather strong assumption. Consider the sales tax. Although taxable purchases typically increase as taxpayers’ total incomes increase, total incomes typically increase at a much faster rate than taxable purchases. Thus, the gap between taxable purchases and total income widens as total income Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 9 increases. The end result is that the effective tax rates for those with a greater ability to pay are lower than those taxpayers with a lesser ability to pay. Regressive tax rate structures are generally considered not to satisfy vertical equity (unless one is a strong advocate of the belief that those with a greater ability to pay simply should be paying a higher tax, albeit at a lower rate). In sum, evaluating vertical equity in terms of effective tax rates may be much more informative than simply an evaluation of tax rate structures. (31) [LO 4, LO 5] Compare the federal income tax to sales taxes using the “certainty” criterion. Certainty means that taxpayers should be able to determine when to pay the tax, where to pay the tax, and how to determine the tax. It is relatively easy to determine when and where to pay the federal income tax and sales taxes. For example, individual federal income tax returns and the remaining balance of taxes owed must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service each year on or before April 15th (or the first business day following April 15th if the 15th falls on a weekend). Likewise, sales taxes are paid to retailers when items are purchased, and property taxes are typically paid annually to local governments. The ease of “how to determine the tax,” however, varies by tax system. Sales taxes are determined with relative ease – i.e., they are based on the value of taxable purchases. In contrast, income taxes are often criticized as being complex. What are taxable/nontaxable forms of income? What are deductible/nondeductible expenses? When should income or expense be reported? For many taxpayers (e.g., wage earners with few investments), the answers to these questions are straightforward. For other taxpayers (e.g., business owners, individuals with a lot of investments), the answers to these questions are nontrivial. Constant tax law changes enacted by Congress also add to the difficulty in determining the proper amount of income tax to pay. These changes can make it difficult to determine a taxpayer’s current tax liability much less plan for the future. (32) [LO 5] Many years ago a famous member of Congress proposed eliminating federal income tax withholding. What criterion for evaluating tax systems did this proposal violate? What would likely have been the result of eliminating withholding? Eliminating withholding would violate the convenience criterion – i.e., a tax system should be designed to facilitate the collection of tax revenues without undue hardship on the taxpayer or the government (i.e., a tax system should make collection as easy as possible). Eliminating withholding would most likely have slowed collection of taxes and increased taxpayer aggressiveness (or tax evasion). Prior research suggests that taxpayers are more likely to take more aggressive tax positions when they owe additional taxes when filing their return. Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 10 (33) [LO 5] “The federal income tax scores very high on the economy criterion because the current IRS budget is relatively low compared to the costs of a typical collection agency.” Explain why this statement may be considered wrong. This statement ignores the economy criterion from the taxpayer’s perspective. The income tax is often criticized for the compliance costs imposed on the taxpayer. Indeed, for certain taxpayers, record-keeping costs, accountant fees, attorney fees, etc. can be quite substantial. Advocates of alternative tax systems often challenge the income tax on this criterion. Problems (34) [LO 3] Chuck, a single taxpayer, earns $75,000 in taxable income and $10,000 in interest from an investment in City of Heflin bonds. Using the U.S. tax rate schedule, how much federal tax will he owe? What is his average tax rate? What is his effective tax rate? What is his current marginal tax rate? Chuck will owe $11,808 in federal income tax this year computed as follows: $11,808 = $5,147 + 22% ($75,000 $44,725) − —rounded up to the nearest dollar. Chuck’s average tax rate is 15.74 percent. Average Tax Rate = Total Tax ∕ Taxable Income = $11,808 ∕ $75,000 = 15.74% Chuck’s effective tax rate is 13.89 percent. Effective tax rate = Total Tax/Total Income = $11,808/($75,000 + $10,000) = 13.89% Chuck is currently in the 22 percent tax rate bracket. His marginal tax rate on increases in income up to $20,375 and deductions from income up to $30,275 is 22 percent. (35) [LO 3] Using the facts in problem 34, if Chuck earns an additional $40,000 of taxable income, what is his marginal tax rate on this income? What is his marginal rate if, instead, he had $40,000 of additional deductions? If Chuck earns an additional $40,000 of taxable income, his marginal tax rate on the income is 22.98 percent. Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 11 Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax/Change in Taxable Income = ($21,000 $11,808)/($115,000 $75,000) = − − 22.98% Where $21,000 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $21,000 = $16,290 + 24% ($115,000 $95,375). − If Chuck instead had $40,000 of additional tax deductions, his marginal tax rate on the deductions would be 19.57 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax/Change in Taxable Income = $3, ( 980 − $11,808 ($35,000 $75,000) = 19.57% )/ − Where $3,980 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $3,980 = $1,100 + 12% (35,000 $11,000) − . Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 12 (36) [LO 3] Campbell, a single taxpayer, earns $400,000 in taxable income and $2,000 in interest from an investment in State of New York bonds. Using the U.S. tax rate schedule, how much federal tax will she owe? What is her average tax rate? What is her effective tax rate? What is her current marginal tax rate? Campbell will owe $111,895 in federal income tax this year computed as follows: $111,895 = $52,832 + 35% ($400,000 $231,250)  − —rounded up to the nearest dollar. Campbell’s average tax rate is 27.97 percent. Average Tax Rate = Total Tax ∕ Taxable Income = $111,895 ∕ $400,000 = 27.97% Campbell’s effective tax rate is 27.83 percent. Effective tax rate = Total Tax/Total Income = $111,895/($400,000 + $2,000) = 27.83% Campbell is currently in the 35 percent tax rate bracket. Her marginal tax rate on deductions up to $168,750 will be 35 percent. However, her marginal tax rate on the next $178,125 of income will be 35%, and income earned over $578,125 will be taxed at 37 percent. (37) [LO 3] Using the facts in problem 36, if Campbell earns an additional $15,000 of taxable income, what is her marginal tax rate on this income? What is her marginal rate if, instead, she had $15,000 of additional deductions? If Campbell earns an additional $15,000 of taxable income, her marginal tax rate on the income is 35 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($117,145− $111,895 ($415,000 $400,000)= 35.00% )/ − Where $117,145 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $117,145 = $52,832 + 35% ($415,000 $231,250). − If Campbell instead had $15,000 of additional tax deductions, her marginal tax rate on the deductions would be 35.00 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($106 645 , − $111,895 ($385,000 0 )/ − $400,0 0) = 35.00% Where $106,645 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $106,645 = $52,832+35% ($385,000 $231,250). − Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 13 (38) [LO 3] Jorge and Anita, married taxpayers, earn $150,000 in taxable income and $40,000 in interest from an investment in City of Heflin bonds. Using the U.S. tax rate schedule for married filing jointly (see Example 1-3), how much federal tax will they owe? What is their average tax rate? What is their effective tax rate? What is their current marginal tax rate? Jorge and Anita will owe $23,615 in federal income tax this year computed as follows: $23,615 = $10,294 + 22% ($150,000 $89,4 − 50). Jorge and Anita’s average tax rate is 15.74 percent. Average Tax Rate = Total Tax ∕ Taxable Income = $23,615 ∕ $150,000 = 15.74% Jorge and Anita’s effective tax rate is 12.43 percent. Effective tax rate = Total Tax/Total Income = $23,615/($150,000 + $40,000) = 12.43% Jorge and Anita are currently in the 22 percent tax rate bracket. Their marginal tax rate on increases of income up to $40,750 and deductions up to $60,550 is 22 percent. (39) [LO 3] Using the facts in problem 38, if Jorge and Anita earn an additional $100,000 of taxable income, what is their marginal tax rate on this income? What is their marginal rate if, instead, they reported an additional $100,000 in deductions? If Jorge and Anita earn an additional $100,000 of taxable income, their marginal tax rate on the income is 23.19 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($46, 00 8 − $23,615 /($250,000 0 ) − $150,0 0) = 23.19% Where $46,800 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $46,800 = $32,580 + 24% ($250,000 $190,750). − If Jorge and Anita instead had $100,000 of additional tax deductions, their marginal tax rate on the deductions would be 18.06 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($5, 60 5 − $23,615 /($50,000 0 ) − $150,0 0) = 18.06% Where $5,560 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $5,560 = $2,200 + 12% $50,000 $22,000 ( ). − Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 14 (40) [LO 3] Scot and Vidia, married taxpayers, earn $240,000 in taxable income and $5,000 in interest from an investment in City of Tampa bonds. Using the U.S. tax rate schedule for married filing jointly (see Example 1-3), how much federal tax will they owe? What is their average tax rate? What is their effective tax rate? What is their current marginal tax rate? Scot and Vidia will owe $44,400 in federal income tax this year computed as follows: $44,400 = $32,580 + 24% ($240,000 $190, − 750). Scot and Vidia’s average tax rate is 18.50 percent. Average Tax Rate = Total Tax ∕ Taxable Income = $44,400 ∕ $240,000 = 18.50% Scot and Vidia’s effective tax rate is 18.12 percent. Effective tax rate = Total Tax ∕ Total Income = $44,400/($240,000 + $5,000) = 18.12% Scot and Vidia are currently in the 24 percent tax rate bracket. Their marginal tax rate on increases in income up to $124,200 and deductions up to $49,250 is 24 percent. (41) [LO 3] Using the facts in problem 40, if Scot and Vidia earn an additional $80,000 of taxable income, what is their marginal tax rate on this income? How would your answer differ if they, instead, had $80,000 of additional deductions? If Scot and Vidia earn an additional $80,000 of taxable income, their marginal tax rate on the income is 24.00 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($63, 00 6 − $44,400 /($320,000 0 ) − $240,0 0) = 24.00% Where $63,600 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $63,600 = $32,580 + 24% ($320,000 $190,750). − If Scot and Vidia instead had $80,000 of additional tax deductions, their marginal tax rate on the deductions would be 23.23 percent. Marginal Tax Rate = Change in Tax ∕ Change in Taxable Income = ($25, 15 8 − $44,400 /($160,000 0 ) − $240,0 0) = 23.23% Solutions Manual—Essentials of Federal Taxation, by Spilker et al. © McGraw Hill LLC. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill LLC. 15 Where $25,815 for the revised tax is computed as follows: $25,815 = $10,294 + 22% ($160,000 $89,450)