100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Topic 3 - Passing of Property

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Uploaded on
02-02-2018
Written in
2017/2018

A summary regarding the rules on transfer of property. Provides a clear and simple summary of default rules on the passing of property. Case law and examples are provided.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 2, 2018
Number of pages
10
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Property – s. 61 the general property in goods

- Signifies title or ownership
- Property rights in ordinary sense – binds parties to transaction and all third parties.

Passing of property

- S. 17(1) – property will be passed when the parties intend it to be passed.
- S. 17(2) – in determining the intention of parties, court will look into the terms of the
contract, the conduct of the parties and the circumstances of the case.
 Applies to both ascertained and unascertained goods.

Passing of property in specific goods

- S. 18 – rules regarding the passing of property
 The property will be passed according to the rules until there is intention of the
parties to the contrary.
 If there is contrary intention of the parties shown after the passing of
property in accordance to the rule, the intention shall be of no effect.
 Dennant v Skinner and Collom [1948] 2 KB 164
 Rule 1 – in an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods which are in a
deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the
contract is made.
 Unconditional – contract not subject to a condition precedent or
subsequent.
o Condition precedent can be implied.
 Payment is normally required before delivery in a
supermarket.
 Specific goods
o S. 61 – goods identified and agreed upon at the time of a contract of
sale is made.
o Future goods can never be specific.
 May be specific in relation to the doctrine of frustration.
o Difficulties arise when general descriptive words are used.
 Kursell v Timber Operators & Contractors Ltd [1927] 1 KB
298 – all trees in a forest conforming to certain
measurements at a particular date.
a. Property in trees had not passed because the goods
were not sufficiently identified.
 Joseph Reid Pty Ltd v Schultz (1949) SR (NSW) 231 – all
marketable hardwood timber on a site was a sale of specific
goods.
 Deliverable state
o S. 61(5) – when the goods are in such a state that the buyer would
be bound to take delivery of them.
 Covers situation where the goods could not be said in a
deliverable state physically buy the buyer had agreed to take
delivery as they stood.
 Buyer is not bound to take delivery of defective goods but it
does not exclude defective goods.
$4.11
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
wjdream
4.5
(2)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
wjdream The University of Sheffield
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
7
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
8
Last sold
2 year ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions