100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

SOCI 301 Class Notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
35
Uploaded on
07-11-2023
Written in
2021/2022

Full semester worth of class notes including some pop up quizes that were given to us in class. Soci 301: Sociology of Development and Underdevelopment.

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
November 7, 2023
Number of pages
35
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
N/a
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Sociology of Development & Underdevelopment


WEEK 2A: Development Reality and Theory

Origins of Development
1. Colonialism: environmental and social costs. The ends justify the means
a. Europe put itself as the benchmark
b. Goal: extract resources (pull out and not put in ) + look more westernize
i. Exp: jamaica largest production of __ Development as a social process

2. Development as a social process
a. Social Cost: cultural shifts, community/ relationship changes

3. Development as political intervention
a. Government involvement, multinational institutions like the UN
4. Philosophically: Improving humankind interpreted as socially engineering societies
(capitalism and industrialization)
5. Imperialist intervention (resource extraction, social transformation… racism constitute
the white man’s burden)

Problems with Development
● Development originated with colonization
○ European accomplishment compared to other societies and understood as
dominant and superior
○ Came with substantial environmental problems and social upheavals
● All about the future not about improving the past
○ Exp: reduce the ecological footprint
● The ideal of development ruptured by govt cutback and citizens protests

Development and Social Engineering 19th century :
● Associated with ‘white man’s burden’
○ Changes in language, religion …
● Social engineering: policy for social transformation (capitalism, industrialization,
regulation, colonization, and imperialism )
● Social engineering in colonies: new discipline (forced labor, schooling, segregation )
● Development introduced new class, racial hierarchies in colonized societies as well as
within colonizing societies

Social Engineering in the 20th century
● Development as a ‘project’
○ Decolonization and anti-colonial resistance made development an emancipatory
promise
○ 1945: UN

, ○ Civilizing project: the ideology of nationalism
○ 21st century: development defined by economic growth and rising consumption
● Goal: political independence for self-determination

Development as Projects
1. Development project : (the 1940s-1980): rooted in public regulation of markets as
servants of states; governments protect civil rights through a social contract =
commodity chain
2. Globalization project : (1980 --) markets regain ascendancy; incorporation of the ‘good
market, bad state’ mantra int public discourse
3. Sustainability project : (2000 --), tension between these poles continue as the world
transitions to a new project governed by ‘climate regime”
Example:
● ​Evidence of a Development paradox, where poverty accompanies economic growth
○ Control of 50 percent of world income by the wealthiest 10 percent
○ High levels of malnutrition in India in spite of economic growth
○ The dynamic that links these projects, and accounts for their succession is a series of Polany
mobilization)

● Ghost acres

DO JOURNAL REFLECTION

Development Theory
● Influenced by Adam Smith’s Wealth hof Nations (neoclassical economic theory)
○ Division of labor
○ Free Market
○ Productivity
● Economic principle: markets maximize individual preferences and allocate resources
efficiently
● Development is about output income and consumption
● Ricardp : specialization is good or countries
● Main development theories approach this economic question in different ways


1. Mo

( finish slides*** )




Week 2B: Development Theories

,Modernization Theory

The rise of Modernization Theory
1. USA rise as a superpower: via the Marshall plan and support to weakened European
countries
2. Spread of communism
3. The disintegration of European colonial powers and the birth of new nation-states in the
Third World seeking models of development for their countries

● Modernization Theory: differences between traditional vs. modern societies: So-called
modern societies (North American, European) have increased function capacities
because of social structural differentiation compared to traditional societies
○ Development, as a project, has its origin in the colonial era because European
dominant

Features of modernization theory
● Phased process (eg. economic stages of development)
● Homogenizing process (convergence)
○ Europeanization or americanization process
● Irreversible
● It is inevitable and desirable
● Lengthy process ( evolutionary, not revolutionary)
○ Modernization is systematic
○ transformative: traditional structures replaced
○ Imminent process due to systematic and transformative features

Rostow: Modernization Perspective
● The celebrated Western model of free enterprise
● Evolutionary sequence or ‘stages’ traverse a linear sequence:
1. Traditional Society: agrarian limited productivity
2. Preconditions for Take-off: state formation, education, science, banking,
profit-systematization
3. Take-off: normalization of growth, with investment rates promoting the expanded
reproduction of industry
4. Maturity: the second industrial revolution: from textiles and iron to machine tools,
chemicals and electrical equipment
5. Age of High Mass- Consumption: from basic to durable, good, urbanization and
rising level of white-collar vs. blue-collar work

Strengths of Modernization Theory:
● It has broad appeal in many disciplines and can inform research focus
● Provides clear analytical focus: traditional or modern
● Provides methodology focus: via concepts such as values, democratic principles

, Weakness of Modernization Theory:
● Treats countries as autonomous units isolated from global forces
● Assumes development is unidirectional
● Ignores multiple paths to economic growth eg. Taiwan has strong authoritarian regimes
● Requires elimination of traditional values, which are treated as homogeneous
● Traditional and modern values are not always mutually exclusive
● Model assumes development is all good
● It does not account for de-industrialization, which is taking place in many developed
societies

Dependency Theory (DT)
● Dependency: the unequal economic relations between metropolitan societies and
non-European peripheries account for the development of the former at the expense of
‘underdevelopment of the latter
● Dependency: the vulnerable state of being exploited by core countries
○ Depend on the core for trade, investment, loans, technology etc
● DT argues that trade is asymmetrical :
○ Poor countries are dependent on rich ones
■ They need manufactured goods and are forced to pay high prices
■ Must sell their raw materials and agricultural products very cheaply
● However, ‘dependency’ implies a ‘development- centrism’ where western development is
the term of reference
● Exp: France was interested in the nation-state and colonial countries
○ Creating a DEPENDENT relationship with the foriegn countries = dependent on
foriegn resources
○ Third-world countries need to break the relationship to DEVELOP INTERNALLY

The Development of Underdevelopment = Gunder Frant
1. The development of national and other subordinate metropoles is limited by their satellite
status ( exp: despite how big Lagos is it is still a satellite= limit how far it can develop)
a. Still being exploited by the external force
2. Satellites experience their greatest economic development when their ties to metropoles
are weakest
3. Regions with the most underdevelopment today had close ties to metropoles in the past
4. Latifundia ( plantations) were born as commercial enterprises to respond to demands in
national and global markets
a. Exp: Sugarcane industry wasn’t developed until met the global demand
5. Today’s subsistence-based and isolated latifundia are due to a decline in demands for
their exports
a. Exp: the competitive market for Bananas in Caribbean countries with Latin A
countries

Weakness of Dependency Theory
$8.39
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
areenashrestha

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
areenashrestha UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
9
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
10
Last sold
9 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions