100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Clinical Exercise Physiology from week 10

Rating
3.5
(2)
Sold
14
Pages
73
Uploaded on
22-10-2023
Written in
2022/2023

In this sequel to 'Clinical exercise Physiology up to week 10', we delve deeper into the material. Because how can you use someone's sports level for treatment? As with the previous summary, this one is divided into weeks. The topics of the weeks match the lessons. The following components are covered, among others: exercise testing and its interpretation, the various training schedules, oncology and exercise, lifestyle interventions, high performance sports and much more. Because these are quite tough topics, the summary consists partly of English pieces and partly of Dutch pieces. Good luck preparing for the exam!

Show more Read less
Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 22, 2023
Number of pages
73
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Clinical exercise physiology vanaf week 10


• Week 11: Exercise testing

Aim to measure during exercise testing → it’s all because of performance!
Patients are also familiar with success and failures.

Performance depends on:
-skills
-equipment (apparatuur)
-environment
-motivation
- fitness → fit to transfer energy into movement.




1. ATP – Pcr
2. Glycolisis
3. Aerobic




Common complaints: dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue.




Optimal training design.
Also depends on the activity.

, Fick’s law is necessary.
SV increases after period
of hard training.




Several tests:
- Cardio pulmonary exercise Testing (CPET)
o Measures different organ systems
▪ 3 min warming up
▪ 10 min incremental workload 5 – 30 W/min
▪ 3 min recovery (no load)

Measurements: VO2, VCO2, minute ventilation (Ve), tidal volume, breathing frequency, ECG, blood
pressure, bloodlactate levels, BORG-score (dyspnea and leg fatigue), pulse oximetry (SpO2) and
arterial blood gases.

Question: what is the limiting factor?


Some contradictions for participation in this
test because of the high risk on cardiovascular
events.

, - Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test (Astrand)
o Sub maximal exercise test
o Estemation of VO2 max
o Measures:
▪ Heart frequency
▪ Workload

The better the aerobic capicity, the steeper the line.



o Protocol:
▪ Reach workload (HF: 180 – age)
▪ Note workload
▪ Cycle for 6 minutes
▪ Note HF in last minute



- Six minute walk test
o Self paced walking test
o Outcome is distance (also depends on encouragement, encouragement is standard)
o Protocol:
▪ 10 min. seated rest
▪ 6 min walk on a flat hard surface on a 30 m course
▪ Pre and end evaluation of HF, pulse oximetry and perceived dyspnea
o Consequence self paced: learning effect. Perform more often → better energy
distribution. 1 or 2 learn sessions are advised before the ‘real’ test.


The lower the work rate, the longer the person
can sustain that activity.

Critical power → the work rate on which a patient
can keep continue exercising.




After training the work rate is higher and
the critical power has increased.

The delta time is different at different
work rates. (improvement)

, - Enduced shuttle walk test (ESWT)
o Sub-maximal exercise test
▪ Fixed pace (vast tempo)
▪ Outcome is time
o Protocol:
▪ Subject walks a 10 m course
▪ Pace (80% of peak pace) determined by audio signal
• Peak pace is predetermined by an incremental shuttle walk test
(ISWT)
▪ No encouragement
▪ Terminate on failing to make cone (before the next beep)
▪ Express results as time (min/secs)
o It is more easy to pick up effects of interventions
o The closer to the critical power, the longer the test takes. Post can even be
‘unstopable’ (therefore around 70% of highest intensity)
o Used for evaluation of pharmacological, surgical and therapeutic interventions.

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
1 year ago

1 year ago

3.5

2 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
annegeneeskunde Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
4
Documents
3
Last sold
2 months ago

3.4

5 reviews

5
0
4
2
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions