ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert
yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa
Governance Risk and Compliance
sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
management
RSK4802
ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
10/23/2023
klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz
UNIQUE NO: 591647 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 2
xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe
rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty
uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg
hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjk
lzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
, Questions
1) Identify 5 Key Board structural issues that are sited as possible causes of the
problems at Steinhoff. (5marks)
2) Follow the recommendations in King IV report on the preferred structures of board
members and explain how adopting this would have reduced problems at Steinhoff. (10
Marks) 3) Identify 2 Key Board subcommittees that are mentioned in the case study and
guided by their roles and duties, discuss how their ineffective ness contributed to the
company’s demise (10 marks)