100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Unit 13 - M2

Rating
2.0
(3)
Sold
8
Pages
4
Uploaded on
03-07-2017
Written in
2016/2017

BTEC Business Level 3 Unit 13 M2 Long essay which matches the criteria to achieve the highest possible grade. Overall grade achieved - D*

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
July 3, 2017
Number of pages
4
Written in
2016/2017
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

Unit 13 –
Recruitment
and
Selection
M2
Mahbub Rahman

,Mahbub Rahman – Unit 13 – M2


Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2
Pre-interview.............................................................................................................................. 2
During the interview .................................................................................................................. 2
Post-interview ............................................................................................................................ 3

, Mahbub Rahman – Unit 13 – M2


Mahbub Rahman – Unit 13 – M2 – Analyse your contribution to the selection
process in a given situation


Introduction
For this task, I am going to carry out a self-analysis of what I done to prepare for the
interview (pre-interview), the interview itself, and post-interview.


Pre-interview
WWW: Before the interview, I was well-prepared. I researched the possible questions that
could come up in the interview and thought of solid answers to give if I were to be asked
those questions. I also printed out a copy of my CV to give to the interviewers at the
interview just in case it was needed. Another thing I done to prepare for the interview was
make sure all other necessary documents were given to the employers and were filled with
accurate information. I also practiced my handshake before the interview, so I could make a
strong first impression. What also went well was from the interviewers perspective is that
the group and I had prepared questions that were relevant to the job, and also allowed the
interviewers to gain an understanding of the interviewee’s character through personalised
questions which were based on the candidate’s application form and CV. We also made sure
that the documents we made for the task all had a consistent colour scheme, so it looked
more formal which meant candidates would take it more seriously.

EBI: I could have prepared smarter clothes to wear to the interview, e.g. a shirt and tie. I
also could have filled out the application form with neater handwriting, which would make it
easier for the employer to read. Another thing that could have been better from the
interviewer’s perspective was if the whole group contributed more to making the questions,
as it would offer a greater range of questions from people of different personalities,
allowing for more diversity. This prevents interviewer bias. Also, the selection criteria
should have been more detailed, which would make it more likely for the best candidate to
be recruited who is more suitable for the job.


During the interview
WWW: During the interview, I made sure that my body language did not make me look
nervous or timid, so I kept my hands closed together in order to avoid using too many hand
gestures and to refrain from fidgeting too much. I also made sure I kept good eye contact.
Another thing that went well during the interview was my answering to the questions, as I
had solid answers and said them in a clear and polite manner, not portraying my character
as arrogant. Another thing that went well was that I had a firm handshake at the beginning
of the interview, making a strong first impression and portraying myself as a confident
individual. One thing that went well as an interviewer was that the interview plan wasn’t
$4.13
Get access to the full document:
Purchased by 8 students

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 3 reviews
4 year ago

6 year ago

7 year ago

7 year ago

U wot m8

2.0

3 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
1
1
1
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
mahbub98 PEARSON
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
180
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
146
Documents
47
Last sold
3 year ago

3.7

64 reviews

5
24
4
15
3
12
2
5
1
8

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions