100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary US Civil Rights - condensed revision notes on Women.

Rating
4.5
(2)
Sold
2
Pages
2
Uploaded on
14-03-2017
Written in
2016/2017

Very condensed revision notes on Women as part of the OCR History Course on Civil Rights in the USA. IDEAL for revision and for writing essays. Got me 100 UMS. See bundle for entire course notes. More than 50% off.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
March 14, 2017
Number of pages
2
Written in
2016/2017
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Civil Rights in the USA 1865-1992: Women

Political:
Suffrage campaign (post-war): got 19th A in 1920, valuable exp. BUT: AWSA vs NWSA 1869, but
make NAWSA 1890 (none are women’s groups) vs Alice Paul’s militant CUWS 1914. Divided: NAOWS
1911 Josephine Dodge anti-vote. Never a mass movement, largely white and middle class. 100k in
1915 = half temperance. Political interest remained limited (many voted same way as husband) and
representation only slowly increased. Excluded un-‘neutralised’ immigrants and AA women de facto
couldn’t assert their rights in South.
ERA campaign 1923-1969: BUT: nothing achieved, divided over where to go next after franchise, not
a mass movement. Although passed Congress in 1972, clear wouldn’t be ratified by 1979. 1972:
Schlafly founded National Committee to Stop ERA
New Deal: Frances Perkins SoLabor 1933, Eleanor Roosevelt joined WTUL BUT: only 9 women in
politics, Perkins appointment triggered negative reaction = indicative of unchanged attitudes.
Post-New Deal: BUT: influence diminished, ERA continued to be opposed post-war, only 11 women
in Congress in 1969, women lost influence in social policy as males increasingly becoming social
academics/social workers
1960s: BUT: women had the vote but still no powerful political voice
1970s-90s: more politically aware and those putting themselves forward for election 1968: 20 to
1990: 78. Steinem’s NWPC 1971 encouraged women into politics. 1992: YotW = 47 in House, 7 in
Senate. Parties finally courting female vote: Democrats 1974 Equal Credit Opportunity Act BUT:
ambitious women still tended to pursue careers in law/medicine. Republicans still opposed e.g. Bush
vetoed federal paid parental leave bill. 1992: limited progress, no significant power base in political
spheres.

Social:
Growth of middle class: less ‘daily grind’, birth rate for whites down BUT: not for religious/ethnics
Hull House 1889: Jane Addams, supported immigrants, influential pressure group re: slum housing
Temperance: galvanised women, WCTU (Frances Willard) 1874 1900: 7,000 branches, Women’s
Crusade 1873, ASL (not just women) 1893 allied with WCTU = 18th A in Dec 1917. WONPR (Pauline
Sabin) 1929, 1.5m members 1931 = 21st A in 1933, women played vital role BUT: restricted to social
sphere concept, predominately middle-class movement, other factors e.g. nativism (alcohol =
immigrants), anti-German (breweries)/ business pressures, lack of tax revenue
Birth control: Sanger clinic 1916 in NY, ABCL 1921, legal clinic 1923, 1924: ABCL = 27.5k members
BUT: only over 8 states, contraceptives still cost = bad for ethnics/poors, still under state law
1920s boom: like S1 point, credit and consumer goods, easier life for some (white) women BUT:
ethnics? ‘Flapper’ movement was not widespread social revolution, no lasting impact.
Great Depression: BUT: social conditions worsened and women expected to give up job
New Deal: BUT: policies did little/nothing to tackle discrimination
WWII: 75% women wanted to stay employed post-war = shifting attitudes towards separate spheres
BUT: Spock’s book 1946 sold 23m copies, and media reinforced spheres
New Feminism: 1963 Betty Friedan’s Feminine Mystique – erosion of “comfortable concentration
camps”, 1966 NOW formed, Aug 1970 Women’s Strike for Equality. Gloria Steinem Jan 1972 ‘Ms’,
200k circulation by end of 1972, separate spheres being eroded, 1986: 56% women considered
themselves feminists. BUT: new, controversial movement proved divisive – mass of normal women
didn’t see how demands affected their lives, alienated men and 1972: only 33% men supported
gender equality, only 40% in 1990. Movement fragmented e.g. Radicalesbians and The Feminists
(called for abolition of marriage).
Abortion: Friedan founded NARAL 1969 pro-abortion, Roe v Wade 1973 established right to abort.
Democrats v Republicans, brought the issue into political spheres – still rages today. BUT: divided =
Phyllis Schlafly NRLC

Economic:

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
4 year ago

8 year ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
maxthornton Oxford University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
82
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
73
Documents
42
Last sold
7 months ago

4.2

35 reviews

5
18
4
9
3
6
2
1
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions