100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Comm4205 QUESTION WITH CORRECT ANSWERS 2023

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
21-04-2023
Written in
2022/2023

Comm4205 QUESTION WITH CORRECT ANSWERS 2023Marbury v. Madison - correct answer US supreme court case which forms the bases for the judicial review in the U.S. under article III of the Constitution. The landmark decision defined the boundary between the constitutionally separative executive and judicial branches of the form of government. Significance: William Marbury petitioned to force the new secretary of state, James Madison, to deliver the documents. The court found it illegal for Madison's refusal to deliver the commission. Citizens United v. FEC - correct answer US constitutional law and corporate law case dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by corporations. Significance: Freedom of speech prohibits restricted independent political expenditures by nonprofit corporations. (ex: releasing a video of Hillary Clinton shortly before an election that is critical) Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - correct answer US supreme court case where the court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including citizens, but ruled that detainees who are US citizens must have the rights of due process, and have the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before impartial authority. Significance: Allowed citizens to travel back to where they lived to renounce their US citizenship and commit to travel prohibitions and other conditions. Pennekamp v. Florida - correct answer The Miami Herald published a series of inaccurate editorials that accused judges of protecting criminals more than the law-abiding public. Freedom of Expression. a Significance: The USSC held that editorials that contain inaccurate information did not pose a clear and present danger to the administration of justice. Near v. Minnesota - correct answer US Supreme court decision that found that prior restraints on publication violate freedom of the press as protected under the first amendment, a principle that was applied to free speech in subsequent jurisprudence. Significance: Publication that endangers or is of a nuisance to society must be restricted with legitimate power of people speaking to their representatives to save public morals. NY Times v. United States - correct answer Landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on the first amendment. Significance: The ruling made it possible for The New York Times and Washington Post newspapers to publish the- then classified Pentagon Papers without the risk of government censorship or punishment. United States v. O'Brien - correct answer Decision made by the US Supreme court which ruled that criminal prohibition against a burning draft card did not violate the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech Significance: Rejected by the court because it was O'Brien's way to express protest against the Vietnam war. It was unconstitutional because it enacted to abridge free speech and served no legitimate legislative purpose. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District - correct answer Decision by the US Supreme Court that defined the constitutional rights of students in U.S. public schools. Significance: Iowa students wore armband to protest the Vietnam war as a symbolic speech. The ruling sided with the students and they were not suspended for wearing the armbands. Tinker standards are the freedom of speech. Elonis v. United States - correct answer US Supreme Court case concerning whether conviction of threatening another person over interstate lines requires proof of subjective intent to threaten, or whether it is enough to show that a "reasonable person" would regard the statement as threatening. Significance: The court held that that the prosecution needed to show that Elonis intended the posts to be threats, and therefore that there was a subjective intent to threaten. It was objective because the threat is objective, not the post. Texas v. Johnson - correct answer was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. Significance: Gregory Johnson burned the American Flag, but burning the flag falls under the protection under the first amendment as a form of free speech. Snyder v. Phelps - correct answer Is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court ruled that speech on a matter of public concern, on a public street, cannot be the basis of liability for a tort of emotional distress, even in the circumstances that the speech is viewed or interpreted as "offensive" or "outrageous".

Show more Read less
Institution
OHSAA
Course
OHSAA









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
OHSAA
Course
OHSAA

Document information

Uploaded on
April 21, 2023
Number of pages
5
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
StuviaExamHub Havard School
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
459
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
355
Documents
17251
Last sold
2 weeks ago
EXAM HUB (LATEST UPDATE)

QUALITY WORK OF ALL KIND OF QUIZ or EXAM WITH GUARANTEE OF AN A+ latest updates Im an expert on major courses especially; psychology,Nursing, Human resource Management & Project writing. Assisting students with quality work is my first priority. I ensure scholarly standards in my documents . I assure a GOOD GRADE if you will use my work. Feel free to purchase n recommend others for 100% pass EXAMS!

3.7

85 reviews

5
39
4
10
3
17
2
6
1
13

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions