100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary of Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation

Rating
4.0
(1)
Sold
21
Pages
26
Uploaded on
17-10-2016
Written in
2016/2017

This document is a very brief summary of the book Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation (Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., 2002). It is a summary of chapter 1 to 8, including examples.

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
Chapter 1 to 8.
Uploaded on
October 17, 2016
Number of pages
26
Written in
2016/2017
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Summary Argumentation

Chapter 1: Differences of Opinion

The content of a statement always constitutes a certain proposition in which a certain
property or quality is ascribed to the persons or things referred to.

Standpoint: A position from which the proposition is considered or judged (a point of view)
- Positive: when you try to disprove the proposition.
- Negative: when you try to justify the proposition.
- Neutral: when you are in doubt / you are not sure.

Different forms of difference of opinion:
- Multiple: when more than one proposition is at stake.
- Single: when there is just one proposition at stake.
- Mixed: opposing standpoints are adopted with respect to the same proposition.
- Non-mixed: one standpoint is adopted with respect to the proposition.

1.1 Disagreement and argumentative discussion

Argumentative discussion: if people make use of argumentation as means to achieve a
resolution of a difference of opinion.

1.2 Explicit ad implicit differences of opinion

Implicit: only one party expresses its views, the other party’s doubt is anticipated.

A difference of opinion arises when two parties do not fully agree on a given standpoint.

1.3 Positive and negative standpoints

Proposition: UFOs are a hoax.

Dan: I think Ufos are a hoax  positive
Paula: I don’t think UFOs are a hoax  negative
Alice: I don’t know whether UFOs are a hoax or not  neutral

Sometimes it is difficult to see the difference between a positive standpoint and the
proposition: sisters are nice.

Sometimes it is diffucult to see the difference between a negative standpoint and a neutral
position: I wonder if that’s a good idea. Very often this has to do with politeness.

1.4 Standpoints and expressions of doubt

Proposition can differ in:

, 1. Subject (onderwerp)
2. Scope (reikwijdte: op 1 persoon of hele groep bijv.)
3. Force (kracht: met zekerheid of met voorzichtige veronderstelling)

A standpoint can be related to more than one proposition.
- Indicators: and, but

1.5 Types of differences of opinion

Elementary form of difference of opinion: when a standpoint meets with doubt.
- Single
- Non-mixed

Any complex differences of opinion can be broken down into two or more elementary
differences of opinion. The following single mixed difference of opinion can be analysed as
consisting of two elementary differences of opinion:

Peter: You always react too fast!
Alice: I do not!

First elementary difference of opinion:
Peters positive standpoint with respect to the proposition.
Alice’s doubt about this standpoint.

Second elementary difference of opinion:
Alice’s negative standpoint with respect to the proposition.
Peter’s doubt about the standpoint.

1.6 Main and subordinate differences of opinion

In trying to identify a difference of opinion, it is important to distinguish between the main
difference of opinion and any subordinate differences of opinion.

Subordinate differences of opinion ontstaan doordat aangevoerde argumenten zelf ook weer
in twijfel worden getrokken of tegenspraak tegenkomen.

Instead of being states at the outset, the main difference of opinion often comes to light
gradually, so that what the two parties actually disagree on becomes clear only in the course
of the discussion. What also often happens is that the same standpoint is repeated in a
somewhat different way:

Alice: The French are chauvinistic. I mean, most French people are chauvinistic. I’ll
tell you why I think so…



1.7 How to recognize standpoints and doubt

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
7 year ago

Tight, effective and complete

4.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Frankalouise Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
56
Member since
12 year
Number of followers
51
Documents
2
Last sold
1 month ago

3.6

7 reviews

5
1
4
4
3
1
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions