100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Statistics 2 Part B

Rating
3.0
(1)
Sold
2
Pages
13
Uploaded on
08-02-2023
Written in
2020/2021

Summary Statistics 2 part B Psychology Course Radboud University Nijmegen

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
H31 t/m 38
Uploaded on
February 8, 2023
Number of pages
13
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Multiple Regression Analysis

• 1 DV (quantitative) = criterion
• 1 or more IV (quantitative) = predictors

Design:
• Criterion = name (quantitative)
• Predictor 1 = name (quantitative)
• Predictor 2 = name (quantitative)

Hypotheses:
• X = scores
• B = regression coefficients/weights
• (Ypredicted = B0 + B1*X1 + B2*X2 + ….)

• H0(general): β1 = β2 = …. = 0 (1,2 = predictors)
• H0(1name): β1 = 0
• H0(2name): β2 = 0

ANOVA table: general hypothesis tested
• Sources: regression, residual + total

• Df total = N-1
• Df regression = p
• Df residual = df total – df regression

• SS total = (N-1) * var(Y)
• SS regression = (N-1) * var(Ypredicted)
• SS residual = SS total – SS regression

• MS = SS / df
• F = MS regression/ MS residual

• R^2 = SS regression / SS total (this is the proportion explained variance)
• R = cor(Y,Ypred)

• R^2 > 0.20 strong
• R^2 between 0.10 and 0.20 medium
• R^2 < 0.10 weak

Decision:
In the prediction of the (DV) from the (IV’s), the R squared is/is not significantly larger than
0. Its value indicates a strong/medium/weak effect size. The regression coefficient of (IV1)
was significant/not significant. The regression coefficient of the (IV2) was significant/not
significant.
• Only indicate effect size if it is significantly larger




1

, Causal interpretation:
The variable (IV1) is experimental/not experimental, so in principle there is one/more than
one explanation for its predictive value as to (DV). The primary explanation is that …. An
alternative explanation is … (sometimes not obvious).



Extensions of multiple regression analysis
• Bi = standardized raw regression weights; changes if Y scores are multiplied by
constant c
o Can directly plug them into regression equation to predict new scores
• βi = standardized regression weights/beta weights; changes if Xi scores are multiplied
by constant c (only of that predictor, the beta weights of the other predictors remain
same)
o don’t depend on unit of measurement
• Bi = βi * S(Y)/s(Xi)

• B-weight: score Y 2x as large, B also 2x as large. Measurement 100x smaller, B also
100x smaller
• Beta-weight: Doesn’t change with measurement change.

(univariate) General Linear Model (GLM): Multiple regression analysis with dummy
codes for between-subject factors

Two-factor ANOVA: only for equal cell frequencies => regression: can deal with correlated
independent variables (unequal cell frequencies)

Short report:
A linear regression analysis with the … as dependent variable and the … and … as
independent variables, showed that the R squared is/ is not significantly larger than 0 F (df
regression, df residual) = F regression, p = p regression). Its value (R^2 = …) indicates a
strong/medium/weak effect size. The regression coefficient of the IV1 was significant/not
significant (beta = …, p = …). The regression coefficient of the IV2 was significant/not
significant (beta = …, p = …).
• Only indicate effect size if it is significant


GLM-Univariate
• 1 DV (quantitative) = criterion
• 1 or more IV = have to be between-subject factors
o Qualitative = between-subject factors
o Quantitative = covariates

Design:
• Dependent variable = name (quantitative)
• Between-subject factor = name (qualitative)
• Covariate 1 = name (quantitative)



2
$7.87
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 year ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
milajanssen06 Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
50
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
30
Documents
28
Last sold
2 months ago

4.1

8 reviews

5
4
4
1
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions