100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

The 1, 2 in 3 lesson FP

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
22
Uploaded on
02-01-2023
Written in
2022/2023

First three lessons summarized from forensic psychology

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 2, 2023
Number of pages
22
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Cédric vanneste
Contains
Les 1 tot 3

Subjects

Content preview

Introduction – forensic psychology
Goals & practical information

- Up to date knowledge on criminal behaviour, its causes and consequences
- Better understanding of various forensic psychological topic
- Current frameworks concerning legal proceedings, diagnostics, assessment and treatment




- Examen: 20 MPC, 2 open questions

Introduction

- Ed Camper (niet kennen voor examen)
o Model prisoner  very calm, intelligent: IQ 140, gentle
o In contrast with what he did
o Still in detention, 84 years. Very tall, 2 meters
o His mother was not loving or pleasant
 Parents divorced when he was 7
 Father moved out, lived with mother and two sisters
 Belittled him, mocked him, ‘you’re a freak, never find a girlfriend’
 No cuddles or affection, afraid it’d make him gay
 Ed started hating her
 Turned into anger and deep hatred
 When he was 10 he wanted to kill his mother, but still had love for her.
Strange feelings for him
 One of his siters pushed him in the water, almost drowned. He decapitated the head
of the dolls of his sister
 Slept in the basement sometimes, mother was afraid he would do something
o At 14 years he runs away in search for his father
 His father was okay, but he has a new family now
 Ed couldn’t stay, so the sent him to his grandmother
o He didn’t find love from his mother, nor his father
 He felt rejected
o Unfortunately, grandmother is like the mother
 There is a fight one day, with grandmother, grandfather was
 Shoots grandmother in the head and back


1

,  Grandfather comes back and Ed kills him too
 Because he wanted to cover up?
 Rage fit?
o Ed said he just wanted to kill his grandma, to see what if felt like
o Ed felt sorry for his grandfather and didn’t want him to live without his wife
o When released he goes back to live with his mother  probs no other options
o When he gets a car, he starts driving around
 He starts picking up hitchhikers, young females
 Around 150 hitchhikers before it went wrong. He enjoyed being in the presence of
the young women
 But he starts to feel sexual urges
 Started experimenting: when I say this, what will happen
 In 1972 he picks up two young women, drives them to deserted place
 Stabs and strangles both of them
 Put them in the truck and dropped them in the ravine, after he dismembers them.
Irrematio to the cut off head
 Does this to more women, same thing
o One day kills his mom
 Also decapitated her.
 He screamed one hour to her head.
 Then he used her head as a dartboard.
 Then cut off her tongue. Hatred that built up all these years
 Irrematio to his mother as well
o He didn’t kill after this
 The 6/7 girls were leading up to his mother, probs dealing with the inside rage
 Killing didn’t have any meaning anymore
 Turned himself in

Understanding

- Profiling doesn’t happen that much. Not dominant
o In Sweden it is more prevalent, and US, and Canada.
- FP is not forensic science or law enforcement
o We do not do blood splatter things, no guns, no crime scenes, etc.
o It tries to apply psychological principles to assist the legal system
o Forensic psychologist studies human behaviour
- Forensic comes from forensis = of the forum (a marketplace)
o The forums was also a place where disputes were resolved in public. Like a public
open courtroom
o It means it’s related to the law

History

- Middle ages and earlier: good and wrong related to religion, demons, witches, sinners
- There was individual liability = you are responsible for your deeds
o What if a demon is inside you? Are you still responsible?
- End of middle ages: first use of insanity
- Lombrosco 19th century
o Criminal atavism = criminals represented a reversion to a primitive or subhuman type
of person characterized by physical features reminiscent of apes, lower primates,
and early humans and to some extent preserved, he said, in modern "savages".
o He thought criminals have physical anomalies
o Ex.: If you have a strange face, you might be a serial killer

2

, o ‘In general, thieves are notable for their expressive faces and manual dexterity, small
wandering eyes that are often oblique in form, thick and close eyebrows, distorted or
squashed noses, thin beards and hair, and sloping foreheads. Like rapists, they often
have jug ears. Rapists, however, nearly always have sparkling eyes, delicate features,
and swollen lips and eyelids. Most of them are frail; some are hunchbacked.’
- 19th century: development of theories around insanity and criminal behaviour
- 1879: first laboratory for experimental psychology (Wundt)
o In Lypsich
- 1908: ‘On the witness stand’ a book from Münsterberg
o Series of essays to describe research on eyewitness testimony, false confessions and
uses of psychology in legal problems
o Used psychology for a more fair outcome, an attempt to do so
- 20th century
o Psychologist were more called upon to assist the legal system as an expert to apply
their (rudimentary) knowledge to the legal system as expert (e.g., testifying as expert
witness)
o Psychology = a tool in arriving at fair and just legal outcomes
- Jenkins (1962): court ruled that psychological testimony could be admitted to determine
criminal responsibility (i.e., insanity)
o  Forensic psychologists now routinely testify in insanity cases after evaluating
defendants
- From then FP started booming

Stanley Milgram Experiments (1961)




-
- People (actual subject) could apply shocks to ‘subject’ (fake screams) in other room
- Experimenter was there and urged to keep going
- They could give a lethal shock
- People went that far to give the lethal shock; they didn’t know the person in the other room
was fake
- Link forensic psychology: in specific contexts and specific circumstances, everyone could
behave criminally

Stanford Prison Experiment (1971)
- People were guards and prisoners
- After a while, guards started to mistreat the prisoners and escalated quickly
- Things can get out of hand very quickly
- “I offer a psychological account of how ordinary people sometimes turn evil and commit
unspeakable acts. As part of this account, The Lucifer Effect tells, for the first time, the full
story behind the Stanford Prison Experiment, a now-classic study I conducted in 1971. In that
study, normal college students were randomly assigned to play the role of guard or inmate


3
$7.79
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
manouvanfleteren
4.0
(1)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
manouvanfleteren Thomas More Hogeschool
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
10
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
8
Documents
42
Last sold
6 months ago

4.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions