100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Overview of tests MRM1

Rating
3.0
(2)
Sold
5
Pages
1
Uploaded on
29-03-2016
Written in
2014/2015

This document contains an overview of the formulas that are thought in MRM1. It gives a nice overview of all formulas, there meaning and helps to understand them.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Unknown
Uploaded on
March 29, 2016
File latest updated on
March 29, 2016
Number of pages
1
Written in
2014/2015
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Test Description Variable type Hypotheses Conditions Remark Example
Test whether the larger part of
Test whether a population Test for normality the US population is in favour of
One sample 1 Quantitative H0: X =1000 Random and normally
mean is significantly different (Lilliefors) and the health insurance program
t-test variable H1: X ≠ 1000 distributed or n >30
from some hypothesized value. skewness than opposed (1 favour, 0
neutral, -1 opposed)
X1 = rating 1 (before the campaign), X2
Estimate differences between 2 2 Quantitative Test for normality
Paired = rating 2 (after the campaign) Random and normally Test whether training has a
locations. For each item there is variables (e.g. (Lilliefors) and
samples H0: X1 = X2 (or X1 – X2 = 0) distributed or n >30 positive effect on productivity
a pair of observations. before and after) skewness
H1: X1 ≠ X2 (or X1 – X2 ≠ 0)
Levene’s test: if
Estimate differences between 2 Random & independent
2 Independent p > 0,10 H0 is not Estimate the productivity
Independen locations. For each sample H0: X1 = X2 (or X1 – X2 = 0) samples, normally
quantitative rejected and difference between full- and
t samples there is an independent H1: X1 ≠ X2 (or X1 – X2 ≠ 0) distributed or n >29 and
variables equal variances part timers
sample. not (too) skewed
assumed
H0 population correlation = 0
Correlation Test the linear relation between 2 Quantitative Weak, moderate, Measure linear correlation
H1: population correlation ≠ 0
coefficient variables variables strong [-1, 1] between productivity and age
H0: the two variables are independent,
Test relation. Test statistic that Is there a relationship between
(variables are not associated) Random, Ej > 5, normally
measures differences between 2 Categorical age (18-20, 21-23, 24-26 and
Chi-squared H1: the variables are dependent distributed or n >29 and
O and E frequencies in a cross variables older) and attitude (bad,
(variables are not associated) not (too) skewed
table neutral, good)?
Describe relation. Measures the Measure the relation between
2 Nominal Weak, moderate,
Cramer’s V strength of the association - - gender (male, female and male)
variables strong [0, 1]
between variables and plastic surgery
Measure the relation between
Describe relation. Measures the job satisfaction (satisfied,
Kendall’s 2 Ordinal Weak, moderate,
strength of the association - r=c neutral) not satisfied and
tau-b variables strong [-1, 1]
between variables commitment (committed,
neutral, not committed)
Measure the relation between
Describe relation. Measures the
Kendall’s 2 Ordinal Weak, moderate, age (18-20, 21-23, 24-26 and
strength of the association - r≠c
tau-c variables strong [-1, 1] older) and attitude (bad,
between variables
neutral, good)
H0: PMx = 20 transform with Y = ln(X)
The distribution of waiting time
transformation is a replacement  H0: PMy = ln(20) = 2,996 You use
of clients is skewed to the right.
Transfor- H0: μy = 50, transform with Y = √X.  Random and normally transformations if
that changes the shape of a Test whether efforts to reduce
mation distributed or n >30 the distribution is
distribution or relationship. √X = 50, so X= 50kwadraat H0: PMx the waiting times are reduced
too skewed.
successfully.
= 2500

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
7 year ago

7 year ago

3.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
adrosendaal Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
98
Member since
9 year
Number of followers
73
Documents
10
Last sold
3 year ago

3.4

22 reviews

5
1
4
13
3
3
2
3
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions