100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Samenvatting Part 2 Corporate Valuation

Rating
2.0
(1)
Sold
3
Pages
5
Uploaded on
02-03-2016
Written in
2015/2016

Part 1 van Corporate Valuation voor master finance studenten aan Tilburg University.

Institution
Course

Content preview

Horizontal analysis: analysis over time, starting with oldest.
Vertical analysis: compare outcome with industry averages or benchmark
(norm).
Vertizontal analysis: vertical + horizontal, compare with industry over the
years.

Golden Balance Rule: upper part of balance sheet, two ratios with five norms.
Two ratios are always complementary, sometimes contradictionary.
 Growth Working Capital Ratio: current assets should be 130% bigger
than current liabilities (Z-curve), conservative financial structure. If you
have more current assets you are more liquid.
 Golden Balance Rule Ratio: four norms:
o Absolute norm: 0<GBR−R<1 , not possible to have negative
balance sheet items (except for equity). So GBR-R will be negative if
equity is more negative than sum of provisions, LT liabilities, and
shareholders’ equity (technical bankruptcy  really bankrupt if not
liquid anymore).
 GBR−R>1 : illiquidity (worse than technical bankruptcy).
o Favorite range: 0.5<GBR−R<0.8
 0−0.5 : over liquidity, too much liquidity.
 0.8−1 : entering illiquidity.
Growth Current Assets ¿ 1.3
Working Current Liabilities
Capital Ratio
Golden Balance ¿ Assets Absolute:
Rule Equity + Provisions+ Non−Current Liabilities 0<GBR−R<1
Favorite:
0.5<GBR−R<0.8

NWC: Current Assets−Current Liabilities , should always be positive.
 Autonomous: cash, banking loans.
 Inherent/induced: sticky to the business, inventories, accounts
receivable, prepayments, accruals, accounts payable.
WC Matrix:
NWC >0 NWC<0
I −NWC<0 Favorable (Z-curve) NT >0
NT >0 +¿
++¿ NT <0
−¿
I −NWC>0 NT >0
+¿ NT <0
NT <0 −−¿
−¿
Favorable: more current assets are preferred over current liabilities, but more
induced liabilities than induced current assets (more accounts payable than
accounts receivable).

NT = Net Treasury = autonomous NWC.

, Current Ratio Current Assets ¿ 1.3
(3rd grade Current Liabilities
liquidity)
Quick Ratio (2nd Current Assets−Inventory ¿1
grade liquidity) Current Liabilities
Cash Ratio (1st Deposits+Cash ¿ 0.2
grade liquidity) Current Liabilities
Financials should always start with 1st grade liquidity and then calculate bottom
up.
Situation: Cash Ratio<0.2  calculate lack of 1st grade liquidity (
0.2−outcome Cash Ratio ). Quick Ratio>1−lack of 1st grade liquidity (since not
allowed to make tradeoff). Only deduct if there’s shortage.
st
Current Ratio >1.3−lack of 1 grade liquidity . Only deduct Cash Ratio.

Why Cash Ratio > 0.2? Ratio is for all branches/industries, every company.
1. Risk mitigation (buffer).
2. Sinking fund for investments (CAPEX, PPE).
3. Opportunity reason in order to make quick moves.
4. Hostile takeover; can’t be planned easily.

Loan-to-Deposit Financial Cushion Deposits+Cash ¿ 0.5
Ratio (L-t-D)
=
Autonomous ST Liabilities Autonomous ST Liabilities

Capital ¿ Assets+ Induced /Trade NWC+ Financial Cushion
Employed
Return on EBIT ¿ 16 >WACC
Capital ¿ Assets+ Induced/ Trade NWC + Financial Cushion
Employed
(ROCE)
Return on Net Net Earnings
Assets (RONA) ¿ Assets+ NWC

Cash conversion cycle (days working capital):
Purchase markets: Starbucks:
1. Primary process: coffee,
water, cups, tea
2. Secondary process: toilet
paper, insurance, printer,
fees.

Stock-to-fulfill:
1. Parts
2. Finished goods

Production-to-stock: all pieces/materials in machines in order to produce.

Cash doesn’t flow in same pace as products. There might be an abundance or
shortage of cash  capital markets.

Days working capital (DWC): days cash is traveling through induced process
of CCC (90 days), take average figures of balance sheet if possible:

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 2, 2016
Number of pages
5
Written in
2015/2016
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$4.73
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
9 year ago

2.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LVermunt Tilburg University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
142
Member since
10 year
Number of followers
78
Documents
18
Last sold
1 year ago

Master Finance studente aan Tilburg University.

4.0

22 reviews

5
8
4
7
3
5
2
2
1
0

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions