Difference between crisis management and contingency planning
• the aim of crisis management is to return to normal business operations as swiftly as Crisis Management:
possible, this can be achieved by using a contingency plan
• crisis management focuses on communication, transparency, speed and control of the • crisis management - concerns the steps a company can take to
situations limit the damage caused by an unpredicted event or crisis
• A contingency plan is the means of acting in a situation when something has not gone to • the aim of crisis management is to return to normal business
plan operations as swiftly as possible
• crisis management will vary according to situations
• Effective crisis management depends upon communication,
transparency, speed and control.
Contingency Planning • Communication
• effective communication with both external and internal
• contingency plan - outlines the immediate actions a company should take in the event stakeholders is essential at times of crisis
of a crisis • internal one-way communication with employees ensure that
• contingency plans ensure the aftermath is less chaotic once a major incident has everyone understands the problem, the plan, and their
occurred responsibilities
• with a detailed contingency plan, people know what to do, where to go, and where to • After this, two-way communication may be necessary to listen to
seek help if they need it the viewpoints of workers who can help managers fully understand
• Advantages of contingency planning: the problem, find potential solutions, and increase motivation
• cost and time • External communication can earn goodwill at a time when it is
• a detailed plan should aid swift decision making needed most
• rapid implementation of decision should be possible • deciding not to communicate with external parties such as
• the business should be able to return to normal quickly and minimise losses suppliers is risky as it can damage trust
• minimises chance of managers making costly mistakes in a high pressure • Transparency
environment • transparency and full disclosure of the gravity of the situation is
• Risk and Safety advisable, this is because people will be sympathetic and willing to
• keep everyone as safe as possible give the benefit of the doubt
• minimise the risk of potential accidents or loss of life • Speed
• specific contingency plans will be in place for specific situations • rapid decision making and effective implementation of those
• Disadvantages of contingency planning: decision will help return to normal business operations as soon as
• costs and time possible
• plans need to be reviewed and updated regularly which has an opportunity cost in • the use of a contingency plan can help
terms of time and resources • Control
• contingency plans take a lot of time to write up for specific situations • autocratic leadership might be most effective
• the cost of contingency may be too much for small firms so their plans are less • autocratic leaders make quick decision and ensure that actions are
effective carried out which can lead to an effective response
• some firms may allocate resources elsewhere rather than to contingency planning • People may be motivated by strong, decisive leadership in times of
• Risks and safety crisis
• a contingency plan must take into account that in the real situation panic and
confusion may set in, which makes contingency planning unpredictable in reality