HLT-362V Artical Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics.

HLT-362V Artical Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics. Article Citation and Permalink (APA format) Article 1 Knowles, R. T., Hawkman, A. M., & Nielsen, S. R. (2020). The social studies teacher-coach: A quantitative analysis comparing coaches and non-coaches across how/what they teach. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 117–125. Point Description Broad Topic Area/Title It is a comparison between social studies teacher, who are coaches and those who are not, regarding teacher demographics and school contexts, disciplines taught, and instructional preferences Problem Statement (What is the problem research is addressing?) To understand the implications of serving in the dual role of social studies and coach. Purpose Statement (What is the purpose of the study?) To understand the elements of the teacher-coach and whether coaches vary from non-coaches in what and how they teach. Research Questions (What questions does the research seek to answer?) 1) Do social studies teachers, who coach, differ in demographic characteristics and school contexts from non-coaching teachers? 2) Do social studies teachers, who coach, differ in the subjects they teach from non-coaching teachers? 3) Do social studies teachers, who coach, differ in their emphases in instruction from non-coaching teachers? Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) Teacher-coaches are more likely to implement lectures, textbooks, worksheets, and videos, while non-coaches were more likely to prefer examinations of photographs, artifacts, or primary materials. Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables Independent variables: gender, teacher race, community type, teaching experiences, teacher demographics, school context, school racial makeup, and school socioeconomic status. Dependent variable: comparing social studies teacher-coaches and noncoaches.