100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Thesis

Discussion & Conclusion

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A
Uploaded on
26-07-2022
Written in
2021/2022

The last chapter includes a deep discussion of the results, theoretical contribution to the existing research, managerial implications, limitations and suggestions for further research, as well as a conclusion.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 26, 2022
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Thesis
Supervisor(s)
Elko klijn
Year
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

Bibliography
Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions.
Small Business Economics, 31(1), 219-234.
Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Abed, I. A., Nikkeh, N. S., & Mohammed, M. A. (2020). Dynamic
Capabilities and Innovation Performance: Systematic Literature Review. Technology Reports
of Kansai University, 62(10), 5989-6000.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct
in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49.
Anokhin, S., & Schulze , W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. . Journal of
Business Venturing, 24(5), 465-476.
Babelytė-Labanauskė, K., & Nedzinska, Š. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research
organizations' R&D and innovation performance. Journal of Modeling in Management, 12,
603-630.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
17(1), 3-10.
Bartlett, G. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business
Review, 64(6), 87-94.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of
Political Economy, 94(5), 893-921.
Benner , M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2002). Process Management and Technological Innovation: A
Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries. . Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47, 676-706.
Berry, H. (2014). Global integration and innovation: Multicountry knowledge generation within
MNCs. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 869–890.
Bessler, W., Drobetz, W., & Adcock, C. (2013). Asset Management and International Capital
Markets. Oxon: Routledge.
Bierly III, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The Application of External Knowledge:
Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies,
46(3), 0022-2380.
Biesenthal, C., Gudergan, S., & Ambrosini, V. (2019). The role of ostensive and performative routine
aspects in dynamic capability deployment at different organizational levels. Long Range
Planning, 52(3), 350-365.
Blau, P. M., Scott, W. R., & Smith, J. H. (1963). Formal organizations: a comparative approach
(Ser. International library of sociology and social reconstruction). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bleich, E. (2007). Institutional continuity and change. Policy Studies, 27(3), 219-234.
Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a
Panel of British Manufacturing Firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 529-554.
Bontis , N., Keow , W. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in
malaysian industries. Joumal of lntellecrual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Puky, T. (2009). Institutional differences and the development of
entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and
Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 762-778.
Bruton, G., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry:
Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing,
18(2), 233–259.
Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. (2010). Bringing institutions into performance persistence
research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of
International Business Studies, 41(7), 1119-1140.
Cheng, M. L., & Huang, C. (2016). Transforming China’s IP system to stimulate innovation. In A. Y.
Lewin, J. P. Murmann, & M. Kenney (Eds.), China’s innovation challenge: Overcoming the
middle-income trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




- 55 -
$11.35
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
ewelinabarbosa

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
ewelinabarbosa Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
4
Documents
10
Last sold
1 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions