The question of which duty Addy has infringed as a director of ABC Ltd necessitates
analysis of legislations and common law principles concerning the director’s duties.
Duty to Act within his power:
The first duty of direction is that they should act within the positions of their power as
outlined in the company’s articles of association and every memorandum
association. 1 Consequently, s171 states that a director of a company must, act in
accord with the company’s constitution, 2 and only exercise powers for the purpose
for which they are conferred. 3 In Re Smith, 4 Lord Greene stated that directors must
not exercise their powers for any collateral purpose.“ In this scenario, the power was
given to Addy as a director to set up a meeting with SKAR Ltd. Addy may have
breached his duty as he acted outside his power by diverting the business
opportunity to XYZ Ltd.
Duty to promote the success of the company.
The primary responsibility of the director under s172 CA 2006 is to execute his role
in an approach he considers, in good faith, would be probably to uphold the success
of the corporation for the advantage of its members in general. 5 In Re Smith, 6 Lord
Greene held that the directors were required to “act bona fide in that they consider
not what a court may consider is in the interest of the company, and not for any
collate rate purpose.“ Equally, when acting in good faith, the directors should have
regard to the six factors recorded in s172 CA 2006 7 , though not an exhaustive list.
1
Alastair Hudson, Understanding Company Law (Taylor and Francis 2017) p119.
2
Company Act 2006 s 171(a)
3
Company Act 2006 s 171(b).
4
Re Smith and Fawcett Ltd [1942] Ch 304, [1942] 1 ALL ER 542.
5
Company Act 2006 s.172
6
Re Smith and Fawcett Ltd [1942] Ch 304, [1942] 1 ALL ER 542.
7
Company Act 2006 s 172(1)