100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

AQA A-level BIBLICAL HEBREW 7677/2 PAPER 2 Prose Literature Mark scheme

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
22
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
24-02-2022
Written in
2022/2023

AQA A-level BIBLICAL HEBREW 7677/2 PAPER 2 Prose Literature Mark scheme Examples of minor and major errors: ַ֣וּאֽמ ֲר ַ בּתֶ֣֣֣ ְ ל םֶ֣ה ָ א ם ֶ֣֗שׁ ֲ נ ר ֨כִרְת ְ מ וּבּ ֵ֣֣֤֜מי ֵ ה יבּ ַ רַדּבּ ְן ֵמ ֙בּפּ ִנ ְי ֵא ֣֣֙ר ֲבּבּ ןוֹרְי־תיִ י בּבּע ְבּ ָוֹר ְבּבּ ֙יבּ ַ רַדּבֵּ֣ ְן “You shall say to them that the waters of the Jordan were cut off before the Ark of the covenant of the L-rd when it passed through the Jordan.” (i) “You shall say to them that the waters of the Jordan were cut off before the Ark of the covenant of the L-rd when it passed the Jordan” – the omission of ‘through’ is a minor error as it does not change the sense, so 5 marks. (ii) “You shall say to them that the water of the Jordan was cut off before the Ark of the covenant of the L-rd when it passed over the Jordan.” – the number error on ‘water’ (plural in the Biblical Hebrew) is minor, so 5 marks. (iii) “You said that the waters of the Jordan were cut off before the Ark of the covenant of the L-rd when it passed through the Jordan.” – the tense/aspect error is major, so a mark of 4 is appropriate. (iv) “You said to them that the water of the Jordan was cut off before the Ark of the L-rd when it passed the Jordan” – there are a number of errors here: the tense/aspect error is major; the number error on water is minor; the omission of ‘covenant’ is major; and the omission of ‘through’ is minor. However, the overall sense is more or less correct, so a mark of 3 would be appropriate. (v) “You shall say to them that they cut from the Jordan before the Ark of the L-rd when it passed the Jordan” – there are a number of errors here: the mistranslation of the binyan is major as it changes the subject and object and therefore compromises the sense; the mistranslation of ‘waters’ is major; the omission of ‘covenant’ is major; and the omission of ‘through’ is minor. The key judgement here is that the general meaning has not been communicated, so a maximum of 2 marks is appropriate. There is enough correct sense here to score more than 1. 5 MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL BIBLICAL HEBREW – PAPER 2 – SPECIMEN Guidance on applying the marking grids for the 15-mark extended response This question focuses on candidates’ ability to select relevant examples of content and language from the passage and to structure an answer around these examples to express relevant points. Therefore candidates will be assessed on the quality of the points made and the range and quality of the examples they have selected from the passage. Examiners must use a best fit approach to the marking grid. Where there are both strengths and weaknesses in a particular response, examiners must carefully consider which level is the best fit for the performance overall. 15-mark grid for the extended response question AO3 = 15 marks = Critically analyse, evaluate and respond to literature Level Marks Characteristics of performance 5 13-15 • very good engagement with the question • expresses a range of perceptive points, with very good development, leading to convincing conclusions, based on a range of well selected, accurate and precise examples from the passage. The response is logically structured, with a well-developed, sustained and coherent line of reasoning. 4 10-12 • good engagement with the question • expresses a range of relevant points, with good development, leading to sound conclusions, based on well selected, accurate examples from the passage. The response is logically structured, with a well-developed and clear line of reasoning. 3 7-9 • some engagement with the question • expresses reasonable points, with some development, leading to tenable conclusions, based on a selection of some accurate examples from the passage.. The response presents a line of reasoning which is mostly relevant and has some structure. 2 4-6 • limited engagement with the question • expresses limited points, with little development, leading to a weak conclusion, which is occasionally supported by examples from the passage. The response presents a line of reasoning but may lack structure. 1 1-3 • very limited engagement with the question • expresses points which are of little relevance and supported with little evidence from the passage. The information is communicated in an unstructured way. 0 = No response or no response worthy of credit. 6 MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL BIBLICAL HEBREW – PAPER 2 – SPECIMEN Section A Qu Accept Mark 01.1 How does this passage show Hannah’s depth of feeling? Assess against criteria in the 15-mark AO3 grid (

Show more Read less
Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 24, 2022
Number of pages
22
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

SPECIMEN MATERIAL




A-level
BIBLICAL HEBREW
7677/2
PAPER 2 Prose Literature

Mark scheme


V1.0

, MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL BIBLICAL HEBREW – PAPER 2 – SPECIMEN



Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the
relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments
made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which
was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark
scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every associate understands and
applies it in the same correct way. As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a
number of students’ scripts. Alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are
discussed and legislated for. If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual
answers which have not been raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Assessment
Writer.

It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed
and expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future
mark schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding
principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a
particular examination paper.


Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk




General Guidance

A high level of accuracy in written English is required at this level, and accurate spelling and
punctuation are important.

All answers must be written in English, with the following exceptions, which may be written in
Biblical Hebrew where relevant:
- roots
- individual Hebrew letters
- words or short phrases from the text, if the Hebrew is necessary for a complete illustration
of the answer.

Answers in Biblical Hebrew must be written using the ‘block’ system.

Transliteration of Biblical Hebrew words is only acceptable for proper nouns – all other words
must be translated into English.




2

, MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL BIBLICAL HEBREW – PAPER 2 – SPECIMEN



Level of response marking instructions

Level of response mark schemes are broken down into levels, each of which has a descriptor.
The descriptor for the level shows the average performance for the level. There are marks in
each level.

Before you apply the mark scheme to a student’s answer read through the answer and annotate
it (as instructed) to show the qualities that are being looked for. You can then apply the mark
scheme.

Step 1 Determine a level

Start at the lowest level of the mark scheme and use it as a ladder to see whether the answer
meets the descriptor for that level. The descriptor for the level indicates the different qualities that
might be seen in the student’s answer for that level. If it meets the lowest level then go to the
next one and decide if it meets this level, and so on, until you have a match between the level
descriptor and the answer. With practice and familiarity you will find that for better answers you
will be able to quickly skip through the lower levels of the mark scheme.

When assigning a level you should look at the overall quality of the answer and not look to pick
holes in small and specific parts of the answer where the student has not performed quite as well
as the rest. If the answer covers different aspects of different levels of the mark scheme you
should use a best fit approach for defining the level and then use the variability of the response to
help decide the mark within the level, ie if the response is predominantly level 3 with a small
amount of level 4 material it would be placed in level 3 but be awarded a mark near the top of the
level because of the level 4 content.

Step 2 Determine a mark

Once you have assigned a level you need to decide on the mark. The descriptors on how to
allocate marks can help with this. The exemplar materials used during standardisation will help.
There will be an answer in the standardising materials which will correspond with each level of
the mark scheme. This answer will have been awarded a mark by the Lead Examiner. You can
compare the student’s answer with the example to determine if it is the same standard, better or
worse than the example. You can then use this to allocate a mark for the answer based on the
Lead Examiner’s mark on the example.

You may well need to read back through the answer as you apply the mark scheme to clarify
points and assure yourself that the level and the mark are appropriate.

Indicative content in the mark scheme is provided as a guide for examiners. It is not intended to
be exhaustive and you must credit other valid points. Students do not have to cover all of the
points mentioned in the Indicative content to reach the highest level of the mark scheme.

An answer which contains nothing of relevance to the question must be awarded no marks.




3

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Amerit234 Yale University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
36
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
33
Documents
259
Last sold
1 year ago
BRIANNA ACADEMICS

NURSING

3.8

8 reviews

5
2
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions