100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)

Rating
4.4
(5)
Sold
25
Pages
20
Uploaded on
08-02-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Hierbij mijn CAT over het onderwerp flushen van een venflon. Mag hierbij worden afgeweken worden van de standaard zorg (twee keer daags flushen), zodat dit nog maar één keer daags hoeft? incl. bronvermelding artikel dat is gebruikt.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 8, 2022
Number of pages
20
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

VPL-DT-Module 5 Semester 1
Verpleegkundig leiderschap 2021-

Critically Appraised 2022
Studentnummer: | Hogeschool
Arnhem en Nijmegen | Werkplek:

Topic (CAT) Werkbegeleiders: Examinator:
Naam:
Aantal woorden: 2483 Datum: 14-10-2021




0

,Inhoud
Inhoud................................................................................................................................1
Inleiding.............................................................................................................................2
1. Klinisch probleem............................................................................................................3
1.1 Klinische onzekerheid..............................................................................................................3
1.2 Onderzoeksvraag.....................................................................................................................3
1.3 Doelstelling..............................................................................................................................3
1.4 Beroepsrelevantie....................................................................................................................3
2. Zoeken en selecteren van wetenschappelijke literatuur..................................................4
2.1 PICO zoektermen.....................................................................................................................4
2.2 Zoekstrategie...........................................................................................................................4
2.3 In- en exclusiecriteria...............................................................................................................5
2.4 Resultaten...............................................................................................................................5
2.5 Onderbouwing keuze onderzoeksartikel..................................................................................7
3. Kritisch beoordeling........................................................................................................8
3.1 Algemene informatie...............................................................................................................8
3.2 Beoordeling artikel..................................................................................................................9
3.2.1 Validiteit..................................................................................................................................................9
3.2.2 Betrouwbaarheid en methodologische kwaliteit....................................................................................9

4. De beslissing op grond van beschikbare evidence..........................................................10
4.1 Antwoord op onderzoeksvraag..............................................................................................10
4.2 Aanbeveling voor de praktijk.................................................................................................10
4.3 Toepasbaarheid voor de praktijk...........................................................................................10
Literatuurlijst....................................................................................................................11
Bijlagen............................................................................................................................12
Bijlage A: zoekschema.................................................................................................................12
A.1. Zoekstring variaties.................................................................................................................................13
A.2. Gevonden artikelen.................................................................................................................................14

Bijlage B: Beoordelingsformulier RCT..........................................................................................18
B.1. Validiteit..................................................................................................................................................18
B.2. Toepasbaarheid......................................................................................................................................19




1
Critcally Appraised Topic (CAT), Module 5 verpleegkundig leiderschap

, Inleiding

In deze module wordt er gewerkt aan continu onderzoekend vermogen leidend tot reflectie,
evidence based practice (EBP) en innovatie van de beroepspraktijk (Hogeschool Arnhem en
Nijmegen, 2020).
Met de CAT wordt erbij gedragen aan het voortdurend actief kennis zoeken en dit te delen.
Hierbij wordt er gebruik gemaakt van praktijkgericht onderzoek doen. Daarnaast wordt
methodisch op eigen handelen gereflecteerd.

In het kader van de HBO-verpleegkundige heb ik mij objectief opgesteld om een aanleiding te
zoeken en hier een EBP antwoord op te vinden door middel van het schrijven van de CAT.
Hierdoor is de rol van EBP-professional is toegepast.




2
Critcally Appraised Topic (CAT), Module 5 verpleegkundig leiderschap
$7.85
Get access to the full document:
Purchased by 25 students

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 5 reviews
2 year ago

3 year ago

3 year ago

3 year ago

3 year ago

4.4

5 reviews

5
3
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
AAPP Hogeschool Arnhem en Nijmegen
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
90
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
61
Documents
11
Last sold
3 days ago

3.8

17 reviews

5
5
4
6
3
5
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions