Literatuur & jurisprudentie
Inhoudsopgave
WEEK 1.......................................................................................................................................................... 4
GEEN VOORGESCHREVEN STOF...................................................................................................................................4
WEEK 2.......................................................................................................................................................... 5
LITERATUUR...........................................................................................................................................................5
Asser/Sieburgh 6-111 2018, nrs. 354- 377........................................................................................................5
ORP 2020/8 Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch - Reactie............................................................8
JURISPRUDENTIE......................................................................................................................................................8
Hoge Raad 11 maart 1977, NJ 1977 /521 ('Kribbebijter').................................................................................8
Hoge Raad 20 februari 2004, NJ 2005/493 (DSM/Fox)....................................................................................9
Hoge Raad 19 januari 2007, NJ 2007/575 (Meyer Europe/PontMeyer)...........................................................9
Hoge Raad 5 april 2013, NJ 2013/214 (Lundiform/Mexx)................................................................................9
Hoge Raad 25 november 2016, NJ 2017/114 (FNV/Condor)..........................................................................10
WEEK 3........................................................................................................................................................ 11
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................11
ORP 2015/127 Schuldeisersverzuim, wanneer eindigt het?...........................................................................11
Asser/Sieburgh 6-I 2020, nrs. 189 – 286.........................................................................................................11
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................19
HR 29 januari 2010, NJ 2010/70 (IFN/Nova)..................................................................................................19
Hoge Raad 21 september 2007, NJ 2009/50 (Ammerlaan/Enthoven)...........................................................19
Hoge Raad 29 februari 2008, NJ 2008/144 (CBC/Licores)..............................................................................19
Hoge Raad 5 oktober 2012, NJ 2012/584 (Tyco/Delata)................................................................................20
WEEK 4........................................................................................................................................................ 21
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................21
Asser/Sieburgh 6-I 2020, nrs. 316 – 425.........................................................................................................21
Syllabus Niet-nakoming..................................................................................................................................27
Syllabus Wanprestatie....................................................................................................................................29
WEEK 5........................................................................................................................................................ 31
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................31
WEEK 6........................................................................................................................................................ 33
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................33
Asser/Hartkamp 3-I 2019, Hoofdstuk 1..........................................................................................................33
Asser/Hartkamp 3-I 2019, Hoofdstuk 2 m.u.v. par. 2.3.III..............................................................................33
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................36
HvJ EU 16 december 1976, zaak C-33/76 (Rewe-Zentraljinanz).....................................................................36
HvJ EU 20 september 2001, zaak C-453/99 (Courage/Crehan)......................................................................36
HvJ EU 16 maart 2010, zaak C-325/08 (Olympique Lyonnais).......................................................................36
HvJ EU 20 december 2013, NJ 2014/347 (BP/Benschop)................................................................................37
HvJ EU 19 januari 2010, C-555/07 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:21) (Kucukdeveci)..........................................................37
HvJ EU 6 november 2018, gevoegde zaken C-569/16 en 570/16 (ECLI:EU:C:2018:871) (Bauer en Brosonn) 38
HvJ EU 22 januari 2019, C-193/17 (ECLI:EU:C:2019:43) (Cresco)...................................................................38
WEEK 7........................................................................................................................................................ 40
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................40
, M.G.J. van ’t Ende, ‘Grenzen aan wijzigingsbedingen in algemene voorwaarden: biedt de Hoge Raad
dezelfde consumentenbescherming als het HvJ EU? (I)’, WPNR 2020/7305 & M.G.J. van ’t Ende, ‘Grenzen
aan wijzigingsbedingen in algemene voorwaarden: biedt de Hoge Raad dezelfde consumentenbescherming
als het HvJ EU? (II, slot)’, WPNR 2020/7306...................................................................................................40
Jac. Hijma, Algemene voorwaarden (Mon. BW nr. B55), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer 2016, nrs. 25-33a en
44a-44b...........................................................................................................................................................41
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................43
HvJ EU 30 april 2014, C-26/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:282 (Kásler)..........................................................................43
HvJ EU 21 april 2016, C-377/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:283 (Radlinger)..................................................................43
HvJ EU 27 januari 2021, gevoegde zaken C-229/19 en C-289/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:68 (Dexia)......................44
HR 13 september 2013, ECLI:NL:HR:2013:691, NJ 2014/274 (Heesakkers/Voets).........................................44
WEEK 8........................................................................................................................................................ 46
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................46
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 1 (Onbenoemde overeenkomsten), p. 1 t/m 7....................................46
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 4, par. 1 t/m 4.4 (De distributieovereenkomst), p. 103 t/m 135........47
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 5, par. 5 (Duur en einde franchiseovereenkomst), p. 176 t/m 183.....49
I.S.J. Houben en J. Nijland, 'Het vereiste van de zwaarwegende grond bij opzegging van
duurovereenkomsten: niet dood en begraven', MvV 2019, nr. 9, p. 327-332................................................50
J.H.M. Spanjaard, 'Een nieuwe wet, een nieuw geluid - veranderingen voor de franchise-overeenkomst
door de Wet Franchise', Contracteren 2020, nr. 4, p......................................................................................50
144-151...........................................................................................................................................................50
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................51
HR 21 juni 1991, NJ 1991/742, m.nt. PAS (Stein), Mattel/Borka....................................................................51
HR 14 juni 2013 (ECLI:NL:HR:2013:BZ4163), Auping/Beverslaap...................................................................52
HR 15 april 2016 (ECLI:NL:HR:2016:660), Provincie/Amsterdam...................................................................52
HR 2 februari 2018 (ECLI:NL:HR:2018:141), Goglio/SMQ Group....................................................................52
WEEK 9........................................................................................................................................................ 53
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nrs. 7 – 8.......................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nr. 83.............................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nrs. 125 – 132b.............................................................................................53
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................55
Hoge Raad 2001, NJ 2001/79 (Multi Vastgoed/Nethou) (ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AA9311)....................................55
Hoge Raad 2006, NJ 2006/494 (Körkemeyer/Ottink) (ECLI:NL:HR:2006:AX9511).........................................55
RvA Bouw 2012, BR 2012/126 (ECLI:NL:XX:2012:BX6886).............................................................................56
Hoge Raad 2020, NJ 2020/138 (ECLI:NL:HR:2020:531)..................................................................................56
WEEK 10...................................................................................................................................................... 57
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................57
HR 25 februari 1994, ECLI:NL:HR:1994:ZC1291, NJ 1994, 378.......................................................................57
HR 1 oktober 2004, ECLI::NL:HR2004:AO9496, NJ 2005, 499.........................................................................57
HR 26 november 2010, ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BM9757, NJ 2010,636...................................................................57
HR 2 februari 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:148, NJ 2018, 422...............................................................................57
HR 10 maart 1967, ECLI:NL:PHR:1967:AC1306, NJ 1967, 194........................................................................57
HR 12 november 2004, ECLI:NL:HR2004:AP9666, NJ 2005, 500.....................................................................58
HR 24 oktober 2008, ECLI:NL:HR:2008:BE9997, NJ 2008, 558.......................................................................58
HR 30 september 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2228, NJ 2016, 440.......................................................................58
WEEK 11...................................................................................................................................................... 59
SYLLABUS REISOVEREENKOMST.................................................................................................................................59
SYLLABUS OPDRACHT............................................................................................................................................. 60
WEEK 12...................................................................................................................................................... 62
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................62
, C. Stuurman en H.W. Wefers Bettink (red.), Elektronisch contracteren, Sdu Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag
2013, 2e herziene druk, Hoofdstuk 1 en Hoofdstuk 2.....................................................................................62
H.W. Wefers Bettink, ‘De elektronische overeenkomst in praktijk (1)’, ORP 2011, nr. 4, p. 19 – 27..............64
H.W. Wefers Bettink, ‘lnformatieplichten en de Wet oneerlijke handelspraktijken, De elektronische
overeenkomst in praktijk (2), ORP 2011, nr. 6, p. 24 – 30..............................................................................65
L.E. den Butter, ‘De Implementatiewet richtlijnen verkoop goederen en levering digitale inhoud toegelicht’,
Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht 2020, afl. 3, p. 86-91........................................................................................65
M. de Koning & L. van Vliet, ‘Implementatiewetsvoorstel Richtlijnen verkoop goederen en levering digitale
inhoud’, Juridisch up to Date 2020, afl. 1, p. 30-33........................................................................................67
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................67
Hof Den Bosch 22 – 01 – 2008 (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2008:BC2420)......................................................................67
Hof Den Bosch 22 – 07 – 2008 (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2008:BE0004)......................................................................68
WEEK 13...................................................................................................................................................... 69
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................69
M.H. Wissink, ORP nr. 5 - juli 2012: Vertrouwen op tekstuele uitleg.............................................................69
H.N. Schelhaas, ORP nr. 7 - oktober 2013: Het Haviltex-criterium en de uitleg van commerciële contracten
........................................................................................................................................................................70
M.S. Breeman, ORP nr. 7 - oktober 2020: Voorshands taalkundig uitleggen van contracten.......................71
J.J. Dammingh, ORP nr. 8 - november 2020: Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch – Reactie.......71
M.S. Breeman, ORP nr. 8 - november 2020: Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch - Naschrift.....72
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................72
HR 13 december 2019, NJ 2020/435 (Valerbosch), m.nt. Smeehuijzen..........................................................72
, Week 1
Geen voorgeschreven stof
Inhoudsopgave
WEEK 1.......................................................................................................................................................... 4
GEEN VOORGESCHREVEN STOF...................................................................................................................................4
WEEK 2.......................................................................................................................................................... 5
LITERATUUR...........................................................................................................................................................5
Asser/Sieburgh 6-111 2018, nrs. 354- 377........................................................................................................5
ORP 2020/8 Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch - Reactie............................................................8
JURISPRUDENTIE......................................................................................................................................................8
Hoge Raad 11 maart 1977, NJ 1977 /521 ('Kribbebijter').................................................................................8
Hoge Raad 20 februari 2004, NJ 2005/493 (DSM/Fox)....................................................................................9
Hoge Raad 19 januari 2007, NJ 2007/575 (Meyer Europe/PontMeyer)...........................................................9
Hoge Raad 5 april 2013, NJ 2013/214 (Lundiform/Mexx)................................................................................9
Hoge Raad 25 november 2016, NJ 2017/114 (FNV/Condor)..........................................................................10
WEEK 3........................................................................................................................................................ 11
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................11
ORP 2015/127 Schuldeisersverzuim, wanneer eindigt het?...........................................................................11
Asser/Sieburgh 6-I 2020, nrs. 189 – 286.........................................................................................................11
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................19
HR 29 januari 2010, NJ 2010/70 (IFN/Nova)..................................................................................................19
Hoge Raad 21 september 2007, NJ 2009/50 (Ammerlaan/Enthoven)...........................................................19
Hoge Raad 29 februari 2008, NJ 2008/144 (CBC/Licores)..............................................................................19
Hoge Raad 5 oktober 2012, NJ 2012/584 (Tyco/Delata)................................................................................20
WEEK 4........................................................................................................................................................ 21
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................21
Asser/Sieburgh 6-I 2020, nrs. 316 – 425.........................................................................................................21
Syllabus Niet-nakoming..................................................................................................................................27
Syllabus Wanprestatie....................................................................................................................................29
WEEK 5........................................................................................................................................................ 31
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................31
WEEK 6........................................................................................................................................................ 33
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................33
Asser/Hartkamp 3-I 2019, Hoofdstuk 1..........................................................................................................33
Asser/Hartkamp 3-I 2019, Hoofdstuk 2 m.u.v. par. 2.3.III..............................................................................33
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................36
HvJ EU 16 december 1976, zaak C-33/76 (Rewe-Zentraljinanz).....................................................................36
HvJ EU 20 september 2001, zaak C-453/99 (Courage/Crehan)......................................................................36
HvJ EU 16 maart 2010, zaak C-325/08 (Olympique Lyonnais).......................................................................36
HvJ EU 20 december 2013, NJ 2014/347 (BP/Benschop)................................................................................37
HvJ EU 19 januari 2010, C-555/07 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:21) (Kucukdeveci)..........................................................37
HvJ EU 6 november 2018, gevoegde zaken C-569/16 en 570/16 (ECLI:EU:C:2018:871) (Bauer en Brosonn) 38
HvJ EU 22 januari 2019, C-193/17 (ECLI:EU:C:2019:43) (Cresco)...................................................................38
WEEK 7........................................................................................................................................................ 40
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................40
, M.G.J. van ’t Ende, ‘Grenzen aan wijzigingsbedingen in algemene voorwaarden: biedt de Hoge Raad
dezelfde consumentenbescherming als het HvJ EU? (I)’, WPNR 2020/7305 & M.G.J. van ’t Ende, ‘Grenzen
aan wijzigingsbedingen in algemene voorwaarden: biedt de Hoge Raad dezelfde consumentenbescherming
als het HvJ EU? (II, slot)’, WPNR 2020/7306...................................................................................................40
Jac. Hijma, Algemene voorwaarden (Mon. BW nr. B55), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer 2016, nrs. 25-33a en
44a-44b...........................................................................................................................................................41
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................43
HvJ EU 30 april 2014, C-26/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:282 (Kásler)..........................................................................43
HvJ EU 21 april 2016, C-377/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:283 (Radlinger)..................................................................43
HvJ EU 27 januari 2021, gevoegde zaken C-229/19 en C-289/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:68 (Dexia)......................44
HR 13 september 2013, ECLI:NL:HR:2013:691, NJ 2014/274 (Heesakkers/Voets).........................................44
WEEK 8........................................................................................................................................................ 46
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................46
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 1 (Onbenoemde overeenkomsten), p. 1 t/m 7....................................46
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 4, par. 1 t/m 4.4 (De distributieovereenkomst), p. 103 t/m 135........47
Asser/Houben 7-X (2019), Hoofdstuk 5, par. 5 (Duur en einde franchiseovereenkomst), p. 176 t/m 183.....49
I.S.J. Houben en J. Nijland, 'Het vereiste van de zwaarwegende grond bij opzegging van
duurovereenkomsten: niet dood en begraven', MvV 2019, nr. 9, p. 327-332................................................50
J.H.M. Spanjaard, 'Een nieuwe wet, een nieuw geluid - veranderingen voor de franchise-overeenkomst
door de Wet Franchise', Contracteren 2020, nr. 4, p......................................................................................50
144-151...........................................................................................................................................................50
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................51
HR 21 juni 1991, NJ 1991/742, m.nt. PAS (Stein), Mattel/Borka....................................................................51
HR 14 juni 2013 (ECLI:NL:HR:2013:BZ4163), Auping/Beverslaap...................................................................52
HR 15 april 2016 (ECLI:NL:HR:2016:660), Provincie/Amsterdam...................................................................52
HR 2 februari 2018 (ECLI:NL:HR:2018:141), Goglio/SMQ Group....................................................................52
WEEK 9........................................................................................................................................................ 53
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nrs. 7 – 8.......................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nr. 83.............................................................................................................53
Asser/Van den Berg 7-VI 2017, nrs. 125 – 132b.............................................................................................53
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................55
Hoge Raad 2001, NJ 2001/79 (Multi Vastgoed/Nethou) (ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AA9311)....................................55
Hoge Raad 2006, NJ 2006/494 (Körkemeyer/Ottink) (ECLI:NL:HR:2006:AX9511).........................................55
RvA Bouw 2012, BR 2012/126 (ECLI:NL:XX:2012:BX6886).............................................................................56
Hoge Raad 2020, NJ 2020/138 (ECLI:NL:HR:2020:531)..................................................................................56
WEEK 10...................................................................................................................................................... 57
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................57
HR 25 februari 1994, ECLI:NL:HR:1994:ZC1291, NJ 1994, 378.......................................................................57
HR 1 oktober 2004, ECLI::NL:HR2004:AO9496, NJ 2005, 499.........................................................................57
HR 26 november 2010, ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BM9757, NJ 2010,636...................................................................57
HR 2 februari 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:148, NJ 2018, 422...............................................................................57
HR 10 maart 1967, ECLI:NL:PHR:1967:AC1306, NJ 1967, 194........................................................................57
HR 12 november 2004, ECLI:NL:HR2004:AP9666, NJ 2005, 500.....................................................................58
HR 24 oktober 2008, ECLI:NL:HR:2008:BE9997, NJ 2008, 558.......................................................................58
HR 30 september 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2228, NJ 2016, 440.......................................................................58
WEEK 11...................................................................................................................................................... 59
SYLLABUS REISOVEREENKOMST.................................................................................................................................59
SYLLABUS OPDRACHT............................................................................................................................................. 60
WEEK 12...................................................................................................................................................... 62
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................62
, C. Stuurman en H.W. Wefers Bettink (red.), Elektronisch contracteren, Sdu Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag
2013, 2e herziene druk, Hoofdstuk 1 en Hoofdstuk 2.....................................................................................62
H.W. Wefers Bettink, ‘De elektronische overeenkomst in praktijk (1)’, ORP 2011, nr. 4, p. 19 – 27..............64
H.W. Wefers Bettink, ‘lnformatieplichten en de Wet oneerlijke handelspraktijken, De elektronische
overeenkomst in praktijk (2), ORP 2011, nr. 6, p. 24 – 30..............................................................................65
L.E. den Butter, ‘De Implementatiewet richtlijnen verkoop goederen en levering digitale inhoud toegelicht’,
Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht 2020, afl. 3, p. 86-91........................................................................................65
M. de Koning & L. van Vliet, ‘Implementatiewetsvoorstel Richtlijnen verkoop goederen en levering digitale
inhoud’, Juridisch up to Date 2020, afl. 1, p. 30-33........................................................................................67
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................67
Hof Den Bosch 22 – 01 – 2008 (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2008:BC2420)......................................................................67
Hof Den Bosch 22 – 07 – 2008 (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2008:BE0004)......................................................................68
WEEK 13...................................................................................................................................................... 69
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................69
M.H. Wissink, ORP nr. 5 - juli 2012: Vertrouwen op tekstuele uitleg.............................................................69
H.N. Schelhaas, ORP nr. 7 - oktober 2013: Het Haviltex-criterium en de uitleg van commerciële contracten
........................................................................................................................................................................70
M.S. Breeman, ORP nr. 7 - oktober 2020: Voorshands taalkundig uitleggen van contracten.......................71
J.J. Dammingh, ORP nr. 8 - november 2020: Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch – Reactie.......71
M.S. Breeman, ORP nr. 8 - november 2020: Uitleg van contracten en het arrest Valerbosch - Naschrift.....72
JURISPRUDENTIE....................................................................................................................................................72
HR 13 december 2019, NJ 2020/435 (Valerbosch), m.nt. Smeehuijzen..........................................................72
, Week 1
Geen voorgeschreven stof
