100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LPL Super semester Final exam

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
33
Grade
A
Uploaded on
01-10-2021
Written in
2021/2022

The best answers for the LPL4802 October/November final exam

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 1, 2021
Number of pages
33
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

LPL4802 PORTFOLIO MEMO
SEPTEMBER 2021 SUPER
SEMESTER UNISA LAW OF
DAMAGES

written by

LLBExampacksAndTutorials

, www.stuvia.com




Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal

, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace




LPL4802 PORTFOLIO
MEMO
SEPTEMBER 2021
LAW OF DAMAGES
UNISA



Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal

, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace




FOOTNOTES &
BIBLIOGRAPHY INCLUDED
QUESTION 1 (ESSAY)
QUANTUM OF DAMAGES AND SATISFACTION FOR NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS
(INJURY TO PERSONALITY)




Study the case of Economic Freedom Fighters and others v Manuel 2021 (3) SA 425 (SCA)
and answer the question below.




In para [92], the court exclaimed [sic], “An unliquidated claim for damages must be pursued
by institution of an action.” However, contrary to this accepted practice, the attorneys for the
respondent brought the claim of damages for defamation in an application proceeding.
Discuss fully, the reasons the court put forward in support of accepted practice, that general
damages for defamation must be instituted in an action proceeding. Refer to relevant case law
and legislation in your answer. (25)


[25 marks]
In this Case the SCA upheld a High Court ruling that a political party had defamed a former
politician by calling him “corrupt and Innepotistic” and describing a process over which he
was presiding “secretive”. The former politician had approached the High Court after the
political party posted a statement on Twitter, claiming that the statement was false and
damaging to his reputation. Although the High Court had held that the political party had
no defence to the publication of the statement, it commented that the defence of
reasonable publication – previously restricted for use by the media – was available to non-
media defendants as well. 1



1 Economic Freedom Fighters and others v Manuel 2021 (3) SA 425 (SCA) .




Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal
$39.43
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
shangkhan12
4.3
(3)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
shangkhan12 University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
6
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
6
Documents
4
Last sold
4 year ago

4.3

3 reviews

5
1
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions