100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Evolutionary theory of aggression

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A
Uploaded on
28-09-2021
Written in
2021/2022

Essay for exam question on evolutionary perspective of aggression

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
September 28, 2021
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A

Subjects

Content preview

TABASSUM RAHMAN

Discuss evolutionary explanations of human aggression, including
infidelity and/or jealousy (8+16)

Evolutionary psychologists argue that the different reproductive challenges faced by our ancestors
led to a number of evolved sex difference, including differences in human aggression for men and
women. Daly and Wilson claim that men have evolved several different strategies to deter their
female partners from committing adultery or infidelity. These range from vigilance to violence, but
all are fuelled by male jealousy, an adaption that evolved specifically to deal with the threat of
paternal uncertainty from cuckoldry.

Jealousy occurs through the fear of losing affection or status and is characterised by resentfulness,
bitterness or envy and can motivate aggressive behaviour. Buss suggests that males have a number
of strategies that have developed through natural selection to ‘keep a mate’; these include direct
guarding and negative inducement.

One study to show support for the evolutionary explanation of human aggression through jealousy is
from Dabash and Dabash who studied ‘battered women’ and found that a majority of them cited
that jealousy was a key cause of violence, thus suggesting strong evidence for the role of jealousy in
human aggression. This is further supported by Cascardi and Vivien who found that participants
attribute jealousy as the most common cause of aggression in relationships. Moreover a study from
Young asked students to describe their likely reactions to a jealousy inducing scenario. It was found
that the men would respond aggressively and become drunk or threaten their rival whereas women
would cry, pretend to not care and try to increase own attractiveness to regain male attention. This
therefore shows gender differences towards their response to jealousy. However there is an age
bias with this study as it was conducted using only students, which means we cannot fully generalise
the findings to other age groups that might react differently to jealousy. Furthermore this study lacks
validity because what the students say how they would react might be different from what they
would actually do because there was no emotional arousal involved in the study, unlike real life. Also
there could be a possible reliability issue as social desirability may have affected the student’s
responses in the study thus showing that findings may not be fully accurate. Another study that
supports the evolutionary role of human aggression is from Daly and Wilson who found that male to
male rivalry involving aggression is found in all young men of all cultures, thus suggesting that
aggressive behaviour in jealousy and infidelity is universal. Since this finding is from a cross cultural
study, it is easier to generalise findings to all other cultures.

Evolutionary psychologists say that infidelity triggers an emotional state in the individual as it is
perceived to be a threat to the relationship. Research from Harris has shown gender differences in
the response to infidelity where women are more stressed from emotional infidelity whereas men
become more jealous from sexual infidelity. A consequence of men’s perception or suspicion of their
mate’s sexual infidelity is ‘sexual coercion’ or ‘partner rape’.

One study to show support for the role of infidelity in the evolutionary explanation of human
aggression is from Camilleri who found that sexual assault of a female by her male partner was
directly linked with the perceived risk of her infidelity; this suggests a strong link between infidelity
$11.04
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
tabassum1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
tabassum1 University of Southampton
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
24
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions