100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

CHEM 162 Experiment #5: Spectrochemical Series complete solution

Rating
4.5
(2)
Sold
12
Pages
5
Uploaded on
05-08-2021
Written in
2021/2022

CHEM 162 Experiment #5: Spectrochemical Series complete solution










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 5, 2021
Number of pages
5
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

NAME: Anh-Khoa Duong STUDENT ID #: 1960254
QUIZ SECTION: CI
Laboratory Waste Evaluation
Laboratory waste is considered anything generated during an experiment that is disposed of down the sewer drain, thrown in the garbage, collected in a container for disposal by the UW Environmental Health & Safety department, or released into the environment. Based on the written lab procedure andyour actions during the lab, list the identity and approximate amount (mass or volume) of waste that you generated while performing this experiment. -~0.25 g NH2CH2CO2H
-~0.5 g CuSO4*5H2O
-~1L DI water
-~2filter paper
-~20mL copper complexes
-~10 mL iron complexes
-~6 mL cobalt complexes
-~4 papertowels
-~5 kim wipesCHEM 162 Experiment #5: Spectrochemical Series
Goals of this lab:
•Produce a copper coordination compound and evaluate the yield
•Calculate d -orbital splitting energies from spectral data in nanometers •Apply Crystal Field Theory to the comparison of ligand field strengths among groups of coordination complexes
•Assess the accuracy of experimental data and identify sources of error
Your lab report will be graded on the following criteria using a poor/good/excellent rating system :
•Calculations are complete are accurate, with proper use of significant figures and units
•Data collected is reasonable
•Lab report is clear, legible, and neat
•Error analysis is well -supported and valid
By signing below, you certify that you have not falsified data, that you have not plagiarized any part of this lab report, and that all calculations and responses other than the reporting of raw data are your own independent work. Failure to sign this declaration will result in 5 points being deducted from your lab score.
Signature: Nick
This lab is worth 60 points: 10 points for notebook pages, 50 points for the lab report.
(Do NOT include your notebook pages when you scan your report for upload into Gradescope.)
1 of 5This study source was downloaded by 100000829943187 from CourseHero.com on 08-04-2021 20:17:02 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71695947/Experiment-5-Chem-162-AKNDpdf/This study resource was
shared via CourseHero.com NAME: STUDENT ID #:
Part A: Preparation of cis-Bis(glycinato)copper(II) monohydrate, Cu(gly) 2·H2O
mass CuSO 4·5H2O g
mass NH 2CH 2CO 2H (glycine) g
molar mass CuSO 4·5H2O g/mole
moles CuSO 4·5H2O moles
molar mass NH 2CH 2CO 2H (glycine) g/mole
moles NH 2CH 2CO 2H (glycine) moles
limiting reagent is
molar mass Cu(gly) 2·H2O g/mole
(Note for molar mass: each glycine loses the acidic proton in order to be a bidentate ligand)
mass Cu(gly) 2·H2O expected based on limiting reagent g
mass Cu(gly) 2·H2O recovered g
% Yield %0.003290
glycine
0.3779
0.3290
87.06229.700.4990
0.2470
249.70
0.001998
75.070
Discuss your % yield. It is high or low? What are the contributing factors to this high or low % yield?
% yield = (experimental / theoretical) * 100 => (0.3290 g/ 0.3779 g) * 100 = 87.06% yield
The percent yield was slightly lower, this may have been caused by adding too little of sodium bicarbonate or accidentally rinsing the precipitate with water.Note: the molecular formula for the complex will give you information about the reaction stoichiometry for determining the limiting reagent.
2 of 5This study source was downloaded by 100000829943187 from CourseHero.com on 08-04-2021 20:17:02 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71695947/Experiment-5-Chem-162-AKNDpdf/This study resource was
shared via CourseHero.com

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
3 year ago

4 year ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
smartzone Liberty University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
3199
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
2291
Documents
14406
Last sold
2 days ago
AMAIZING EDUCATION WORLD

GET ALL KIND OF EXAMS ON THIS PAGE ,COMPLETE TEST BANKS,SUMMARIES,STUDY GUIDES,PROJECT PAPERS,ASSIGNMENTS,CASE STUDIES, YOU CAN ALSO COMMUNICATE WITH THE SELLER FOR ANY PRE-ORDER,ORDER AND ETC.

3.7

584 reviews

5
260
4
93
3
103
2
29
1
99

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions