100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MRL3701 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 - DUE 24 March 2026 [COMPLETE ANSWERS ]100% TRUSTED WORKINGS.

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
06-02-2026
Written in
2025/2026

MRL3701 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 - DUE 24 March 2026 [COMPLETE ANSWERS ]100% TRUSTED WORKINGS. Question 1 What is the intended purpose of section 21 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936? (3) Question 2 In Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC), section 21 of the Insolvency Act was challenged in the Constitutional Court. In this case, Harksen argued that section 21 infringed her rights because it amounted to an expropriation of her property. With reference to relevant legislation, provide the reasons why the Constitutional Court found that section 21 did not infringe on her rights in terms of the Interim Constitution. (7) TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: [10]

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

1

, MRL3701 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 - DUE 24 March 2026

Question 1: Intended Purpose of Section 21 of the Insolvency
Act 24 of 1936 (3 marks)

Section 21 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 deals with the vesting
of the estate of an insolvent in the Master of the High Court. Its
intended purpose is to:

1. Protect the rights of creditors by ensuring that the
insolvent’s estate is preserved and managed in a lawful and
orderly manner.

2. Prevent the insolvent from dissipating assets once the
insolvency proceedings begin, as all property vests in the
Master immediately upon sequestration.

3. Facilitate equitable distribution of assets among creditors by
centralizing control and administration under a neutral authority
(the Master of the High Court).

In short, section 21 ensures that once a person is declared
insolvent, all assets automatically vest in the Master, securing
them for the benefit of creditors.



Question 2: Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) and Section
21 (7 marks)

In Harksen v Lane, the Constitutional Court considered whether
section 21 of the Insolvency Act infringed the applicant’s right to
property under the Interim Constitution. Harksen argued that the
automatic vesting of her property in the Master amounted to
expropriation without compensation.

2

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 6, 2026
Number of pages
7
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ScholarsCompas CHARMBERLAIN SCHOOL OF NURSING
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
125
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
238
Last sold
2 weeks ago

4.0

25 reviews

5
13
4
4
3
4
2
2
1
2

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions