Certified Judge Advisor
A 20-12 months-vintage can function a Judge for VEX U - ANS-False
A Judge feels strongly that a particular crew ought to win an award, and refuses to permit
different critiques to be considered. How should the Judge Advisor handle the scenario? -
ANS-The Judge Advisor have to recognition deliberations at the award standards and not
permit a single individual control any choice
A crew ought to put up an Engineering Notebook to be taken into consideration for any
Judged Award. - ANS-False
Are Judges allowed to take photos of groups' robots throughout interviews? - ANS-Yes;
Judges can take pics of robots to help them in later deliberations
Are there situations in which an adult on a far flung crew interview is allowed to activate or
guide scholar responses to interview questions? - ANS-No, adults are never permitted to
spark off or guide student responses at some stage in faraway interviews
At an occasion, some teams are invited to have their Engineering Notebooks submitted
digitally and evaluated beforehand of the occasion, while other groups convey their bodily
notebooks to the occasion to be evaluated. Does this effectively follow the "Consistency"
Judging principle? Why or why not? - ANS-No, because notebooks are evaluated beneath
diverse conditions; all notebook submissions have to be evaluated underneath comparable
conditions, which include the way they are submitted and evaluated
At the conclusion of the event, who must acquire and spoil all judging rubrics, notes, and
substances? - ANS-The Judge Advisor
Can a Judge make notes about the behavior of a group they have now not been at once
assigned to interview? Why, or why now not? - ANS-Yes; if a Judge observes any crew
doing something tremendous or negative they could make a word of it for deliberations
Can a person 18 years of age and who is a member of a VRC team volunteer as a decide?
Why, or why now not - ANS-It relies upon at the software for which they may be
volunteering; VRC, VIQRC, and VEXU have different age requirements for judging
volunteers
Electronic copies of a group's Engineering Notebook must continually be sent directly to the
Event Partner's e mail in preference to being uploaded as a hyperlink thru RobotEvents. Is
this statement accurate? Why or why not? - ANS-Incorrect; notebooks should constantly be
submitted as a hyperlink through RobotEvents
, Engineering Notebooks are first evaluated the usage of the Engineering Notebook Rubric,
but top candidates must be re-evaluated the use of standards decided with the aid of the
Judge Advisor. - ANS-False
Field Notes to Judges may be used both to describe an incident in which the Code of
Conduct can also have been violated, or to explain a group appearing in a substantially fine
manner in the direction of fellow competition or event workforce. - ANS-True
How are groups and Judges assigned for crew interviews? - ANS-The Judge Advisor
assigns Judges to interview teams even as averting conflicts of interest
How many awards can a particular team earn at a unmarried occasion? - ANS-A group can
earn one Judged Award and a couple of Performance Awards at an event
If a crew does not publish an Engineering Notebook, which Judged Awards can they be
considered for? - ANS-Everything but the Excellence, Design, and Innovate Awards
If a team has a recognition for bad behavior, they ought to now not be taken into
consideration for any awards at an event, even supposing that conduct isn't exhibited at the
event. - ANS-False
If a team has earned an award at a previous event, can they earn the same award at their
subsequent competition? - ANS-Yes; awards earned at previous activities have no impact on
a team's capability to earn that award at additional events
If a team has the highest Skills Score at an event, and hence will earn the Robot Skills
Champion award, they are not eligible to earn an additional Judged Award. - ANS-False
If all college students on a VRC group are 18 years antique, it is needless for an person to
be gift for a faraway interview. - ANS-False
If Judges can not discover a crew that they've been assigned to interview, what should they
do? - ANS-Leave a Judges' Note to Missed Teams on the group's pit table
Is it desirable for Judges to most effective interview groups that have grew to become in an
Engineering Notebook? - ANS-No, below any situations
Is it suited for Judges to spend 30 minutes interviewing a rather enthusiastic crew, after
which spend handiest five minutes with a much less communicative team? Why, or why now
not? - ANS-No; because all groups must have initial interviews beneath the same situations
Is it suitable for some teams to have far flung Initial Interviews for an occasion, even as
others are initially interviewed in-person? Why or why now not? - ANS-No; all teams need to
be interviewed beneath the same conditions at an occasion, which include the format of the
preliminary interviews
Is it ever perfect for a Judge to interview a group by myself? - ANS-No; Judges must by no
means interview teams by myself
A 20-12 months-vintage can function a Judge for VEX U - ANS-False
A Judge feels strongly that a particular crew ought to win an award, and refuses to permit
different critiques to be considered. How should the Judge Advisor handle the scenario? -
ANS-The Judge Advisor have to recognition deliberations at the award standards and not
permit a single individual control any choice
A crew ought to put up an Engineering Notebook to be taken into consideration for any
Judged Award. - ANS-False
Are Judges allowed to take photos of groups' robots throughout interviews? - ANS-Yes;
Judges can take pics of robots to help them in later deliberations
Are there situations in which an adult on a far flung crew interview is allowed to activate or
guide scholar responses to interview questions? - ANS-No, adults are never permitted to
spark off or guide student responses at some stage in faraway interviews
At an occasion, some teams are invited to have their Engineering Notebooks submitted
digitally and evaluated beforehand of the occasion, while other groups convey their bodily
notebooks to the occasion to be evaluated. Does this effectively follow the "Consistency"
Judging principle? Why or why not? - ANS-No, because notebooks are evaluated beneath
diverse conditions; all notebook submissions have to be evaluated underneath comparable
conditions, which include the way they are submitted and evaluated
At the conclusion of the event, who must acquire and spoil all judging rubrics, notes, and
substances? - ANS-The Judge Advisor
Can a Judge make notes about the behavior of a group they have now not been at once
assigned to interview? Why, or why now not? - ANS-Yes; if a Judge observes any crew
doing something tremendous or negative they could make a word of it for deliberations
Can a person 18 years of age and who is a member of a VRC team volunteer as a decide?
Why, or why now not - ANS-It relies upon at the software for which they may be
volunteering; VRC, VIQRC, and VEXU have different age requirements for judging
volunteers
Electronic copies of a group's Engineering Notebook must continually be sent directly to the
Event Partner's e mail in preference to being uploaded as a hyperlink thru RobotEvents. Is
this statement accurate? Why or why not? - ANS-Incorrect; notebooks should constantly be
submitted as a hyperlink through RobotEvents
, Engineering Notebooks are first evaluated the usage of the Engineering Notebook Rubric,
but top candidates must be re-evaluated the use of standards decided with the aid of the
Judge Advisor. - ANS-False
Field Notes to Judges may be used both to describe an incident in which the Code of
Conduct can also have been violated, or to explain a group appearing in a substantially fine
manner in the direction of fellow competition or event workforce. - ANS-True
How are groups and Judges assigned for crew interviews? - ANS-The Judge Advisor
assigns Judges to interview teams even as averting conflicts of interest
How many awards can a particular team earn at a unmarried occasion? - ANS-A group can
earn one Judged Award and a couple of Performance Awards at an event
If a crew does not publish an Engineering Notebook, which Judged Awards can they be
considered for? - ANS-Everything but the Excellence, Design, and Innovate Awards
If a team has a recognition for bad behavior, they ought to now not be taken into
consideration for any awards at an event, even supposing that conduct isn't exhibited at the
event. - ANS-False
If a team has earned an award at a previous event, can they earn the same award at their
subsequent competition? - ANS-Yes; awards earned at previous activities have no impact on
a team's capability to earn that award at additional events
If a team has the highest Skills Score at an event, and hence will earn the Robot Skills
Champion award, they are not eligible to earn an additional Judged Award. - ANS-False
If all college students on a VRC group are 18 years antique, it is needless for an person to
be gift for a faraway interview. - ANS-False
If Judges can not discover a crew that they've been assigned to interview, what should they
do? - ANS-Leave a Judges' Note to Missed Teams on the group's pit table
Is it desirable for Judges to most effective interview groups that have grew to become in an
Engineering Notebook? - ANS-No, below any situations
Is it suited for Judges to spend 30 minutes interviewing a rather enthusiastic crew, after
which spend handiest five minutes with a much less communicative team? Why, or why now
not? - ANS-No; because all groups must have initial interviews beneath the same situations
Is it suitable for some teams to have far flung Initial Interviews for an occasion, even as
others are initially interviewed in-person? Why or why now not? - ANS-No; all teams need to
be interviewed beneath the same conditions at an occasion, which include the format of the
preliminary interviews
Is it ever perfect for a Judge to interview a group by myself? - ANS-No; Judges must by no
means interview teams by myself
