Rhythm and Metre
The use of rhythm and metre in symphonic music between 1750 and 1900 developed
from clear Classical regularity to Romantic flexibility, drive, and innovation. Composers
used rhythmic techniques to generate momentum, create contrast, and articulate form.
Over the period, the increasing manipulation of rhythm and metre became an important
expressive tool, often contributing to thematic identity and structural cohesion.
In the mid-18th century, rhythmic clarity was a hallmark of the symphony and metres
rarely diverted from regular. Stamitz’s Symphony in D major, Op. 3 No. 2 features gallant
style elements which were typical of the time. In terms of rhythm and metre the gallant
style favoured regularity and simplicity over any sort of later complexity which would be
seen in the Romantic period- this made it more inviting for the listeners at the time at
the Mannheim court. The opening four bars of the 1 st movement even starts with a
Mannheim hammer stroke which was created at this court where the piece itself was
wrote. This shows some examples of interesting phrasing paving the way for later
rhythmic developments. In C. P. E. Bach’s symphonies, such as his symphony in E
minor, rhythm could be more unpredictable: sudden rests, syncopation, and abrupt
contrasts reflect the Empfindsamer Stil. These devices show how rhythm was already a
means of heightening drama and expressive contrast- perhaps foreshadowing later
romantic compositions.
Haydn transformed rhythmic writing within the symphony. His 31st symphony
“hornsignal” uses a military style fanfare horn motif in the beginning of the first
movement to announce the piece. It is constructed of simple crotchets and quavers but
is highly effective in portraying a hunting call showing how rhythm even in this still early
time period could be used for slight programmatic effect. His finales, such as that of
Symphony No. 88, often rely on rapid semiquaver patterns and syncopated passages to
sustain energy- a typical and infamous move of Haydn which appealed to his audience
at the Esterhazy who respected his defined style. In Symphony No.104, rhythmic drive is
crucial to the second movement, where a simple theme is developed through varied
rhythmic articulation and forms due to the theme and variation structure of this
movement. For instance, at bar Insert a sextuplet variation of the main theme is
portrayed in the upper parts which in an interesting rhythmic feature for the period and
would inspire later romantic developments which used similar rhythmic types for
expression rather than just development like Haydn.
Mozart’s symphonies are generally metrically regular but reveal great sophistication in
rhythmic detail. In Symphony No. 40, syncopated accompaniments and hemiolas in the
minuet intensify the agitation of the whole piece which relates to its minor tonality and
sorrowful feel, similar to what had been seen by CPE Bach. This shows how rhythm
The use of rhythm and metre in symphonic music between 1750 and 1900 developed
from clear Classical regularity to Romantic flexibility, drive, and innovation. Composers
used rhythmic techniques to generate momentum, create contrast, and articulate form.
Over the period, the increasing manipulation of rhythm and metre became an important
expressive tool, often contributing to thematic identity and structural cohesion.
In the mid-18th century, rhythmic clarity was a hallmark of the symphony and metres
rarely diverted from regular. Stamitz’s Symphony in D major, Op. 3 No. 2 features gallant
style elements which were typical of the time. In terms of rhythm and metre the gallant
style favoured regularity and simplicity over any sort of later complexity which would be
seen in the Romantic period- this made it more inviting for the listeners at the time at
the Mannheim court. The opening four bars of the 1 st movement even starts with a
Mannheim hammer stroke which was created at this court where the piece itself was
wrote. This shows some examples of interesting phrasing paving the way for later
rhythmic developments. In C. P. E. Bach’s symphonies, such as his symphony in E
minor, rhythm could be more unpredictable: sudden rests, syncopation, and abrupt
contrasts reflect the Empfindsamer Stil. These devices show how rhythm was already a
means of heightening drama and expressive contrast- perhaps foreshadowing later
romantic compositions.
Haydn transformed rhythmic writing within the symphony. His 31st symphony
“hornsignal” uses a military style fanfare horn motif in the beginning of the first
movement to announce the piece. It is constructed of simple crotchets and quavers but
is highly effective in portraying a hunting call showing how rhythm even in this still early
time period could be used for slight programmatic effect. His finales, such as that of
Symphony No. 88, often rely on rapid semiquaver patterns and syncopated passages to
sustain energy- a typical and infamous move of Haydn which appealed to his audience
at the Esterhazy who respected his defined style. In Symphony No.104, rhythmic drive is
crucial to the second movement, where a simple theme is developed through varied
rhythmic articulation and forms due to the theme and variation structure of this
movement. For instance, at bar Insert a sextuplet variation of the main theme is
portrayed in the upper parts which in an interesting rhythmic feature for the period and
would inspire later romantic developments which used similar rhythmic types for
expression rather than just development like Haydn.
Mozart’s symphonies are generally metrically regular but reveal great sophistication in
rhythmic detail. In Symphony No. 40, syncopated accompaniments and hemiolas in the
minuet intensify the agitation of the whole piece which relates to its minor tonality and
sorrowful feel, similar to what had been seen by CPE Bach. This shows how rhythm
