1
Understanding Deception in Romantic Relationships
In this article, I will discuss an article titled “Deceptive Communication in Romantic
Relationships: A Contextual Approach” by Timothy R. Levine in Communication Studies
(2020). This article examines how people use deception in romantic relationships and highlights
the role of context (e.g., intent, timing, and relationship stage) in understanding deceptive
behavior.
A mixed methods research design was used by Levine; combining self reported surveys
and controlled experiments. Some participants recalled past instances of deception and rated
their severity, and others responded to scripted scenarios. The combination of these methods
enabled Levine to observe real world experiences and controlled responses, which increased the
depth and reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the approach allowed for the exploration of
how context affects the perception and effect of deception in relationships.
The study also found that deception is often used for uninterestingly reasons, such as to
protect a partner’s feelings or to avoid conflict. The main conclusion was that deception is not
necessarily bad and in certain circumstances can help maintain relational harmony. Evaluating
deceptive acts in relationships requires understanding of intent and context, which provides
valuable insights for conflict resolution that, emphasizes openness and trust.
The article is a major strength because it does not condemn deception outright, but rather
considers it a nuanced behavior. The findings are strengthened by the use of both qualitative and
quantitative methods. However, it is limited by its reliance on self reported data, which could be
affected by memory bias or social desirability.
Understanding Deception in Romantic Relationships
In this article, I will discuss an article titled “Deceptive Communication in Romantic
Relationships: A Contextual Approach” by Timothy R. Levine in Communication Studies
(2020). This article examines how people use deception in romantic relationships and highlights
the role of context (e.g., intent, timing, and relationship stage) in understanding deceptive
behavior.
A mixed methods research design was used by Levine; combining self reported surveys
and controlled experiments. Some participants recalled past instances of deception and rated
their severity, and others responded to scripted scenarios. The combination of these methods
enabled Levine to observe real world experiences and controlled responses, which increased the
depth and reliability of the findings. Furthermore, the approach allowed for the exploration of
how context affects the perception and effect of deception in relationships.
The study also found that deception is often used for uninterestingly reasons, such as to
protect a partner’s feelings or to avoid conflict. The main conclusion was that deception is not
necessarily bad and in certain circumstances can help maintain relational harmony. Evaluating
deceptive acts in relationships requires understanding of intent and context, which provides
valuable insights for conflict resolution that, emphasizes openness and trust.
The article is a major strength because it does not condemn deception outright, but rather
considers it a nuanced behavior. The findings are strengthened by the use of both qualitative and
quantitative methods. However, it is limited by its reliance on self reported data, which could be
affected by memory bias or social desirability.
