Mreenslegallife Resources

This is a high-scoring, easy-to-learn 15/15 model answer for the AQA A-level Law question: "Examine the meaning and significance of fault. Discuss the extent to which the rules relating to vicarious liability are based on fault." Perfect for students preparing for Paper 2 (Tort and Nature of Law), this answer clearly defines fault, explains its legal significance, and evaluates the extent to which vicarious liability is fault-based, using all the relevant case law from the official A...

This detailed suggested answer analyzes Ravi’s potential claim under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 (OLA 1957) with clear legal reasoning and case law support. Perfect for law students looking to master occupiers' liability, this resource breaks down key elements: Duty of Care (s.2(1)) – Establishes Paul as the occupier (Wheat v Lacon), Ravi as a lawful visitor (Lowery), and premises liability. Breach of Duty (s.2(2)) – Examines whether Paul took reasonable care, including th...

This is a complete, exam-style structure guide and suggested approach to answering an AQA A-level Law problem question on vicarious liability, ideal for revision, essay planning, or assessment preparation. It breaks down how to determine whether an employer is liable for the actions of their employee, with clear legal principles and case examples. Covers: Employee status tests (Control Test – Yewens v Noakes, Integration Test – Cox v MoJ, and Multiple Test – Ready Mixed Concrete) ...

This is a complete, exam-style suggested answer to a typical AQA A-level Law problem question on negligent misstatement, ideal for revision or assessment preparation. The scenario involves incorrect professional advice leading to economic loss and examines liability using the Hedley Byrne principle and the extended Caparo framework. Covers: Duty of care in negligent misstatement (Hedley Byrne v Heller) Special relationship and reasonable reliance (Caparo v Dickman, Chaudhry v Prabhakar...

This resource includes two high-quality materials tailored for AQA A-level Law students studying psychiatric harm within the law of negligence: Model Answer: Secondary Victim Scenario A fully written, exam-style suggested answer to a question involving a secondary victim. It applies the key case law and tests from Alcock, McLoughlin, and White, with a clear PEEL structure and top-band reasoning. Ideal for revision and practising application of the law in context. Structure Guide: Primar...

This resource includes two high-quality materials tailored for AQA A-level Law students studying psychiatric harm within the law of negligence: Model Answer: Secondary Victim Scenario A fully written, exam-style suggested answer to a question involving a secondary victim. It applies the key case law and tests from Alcock, McLoughlin, and White, with a clear PEEL structure and top-band reasoning. Ideal for revision and practising application of the law in context. Structure Guide: Primar...

This is a complete, exam-style suggested answer to a typical AQA A-level Law negligence problem question, ideal for revision or assessment preparation. The scenario involves a personal injury caused by a lawnmower and examines liability using the three-part Caparo test, breach of duty, and both factual and legal causation. Covers: Duty of care (Caparo v Dickman) Breach of duty (using risk factors and key cases like Bolton v Stone, Paris v Stepney) Causation (including Barnett, Wagon...