Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Other

Essay Plan: 'Critically assess whether it is possible to defend monotheism in the face of the existence of evil.' Discuss

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages

Essay plan containing arguments and counter-arguments for the problem of evil. I used this plan when writing an essay in class, for which I got 22/30 marks (A grade)

Content preview

Philosophy and Ethics: Chapter 1.6: Exam question plan
Critically assess whether it is possible to defend monotheism in the face of the existence of evil.
(30 marks)

IS POSSIBLE IS NOT POSSIBLE
St Augustine/the free will defence - God made a {logical problem} Epicurus. Hume ‘Dialogues
perfect world, Genesis 1:31 – “God saw all that he’d Concerning Natural Religion’ – “is he willing to
made and it was very good” and variety is a part of prevent evil, but not able?... is he able but not
this goodness. Evil is a privation (privatio boni) of willing?” The inconsistent triad/The Epicurean
good. Evil came into the world through the Fall of Paradox – evil exists, god is omnipotent, god is
the angels, who were all created perfectly but omnibenevolent. Rejects monotheism, but not
received different amounts of grace (assistance in deism.
their attempts to be holy) from God, so fell away
from God and wanted to become ‘lords of their own
being’ through their use of free-will. Luke 10:18 – “I
saw Satan fall like lighting from heaven”
This is repeated: God gave humans free-will, Adam
and Eve used free-will and were tempted by Satan
when eating the forbidden fruit (the Fall of Man),
creating original sin (doctrine of original sin),
present in all humans because we were seminally
present in Adam and Eve. Moral and natural evil is
caused by humans, not God, as The Fall of Man
created a cosmological disturbance. ‘Confessions’
(AD397-400) – “free-will is the cause of our doing
evil”.
Angels not mentioned in Genesis 2 and 3, except as
guards of the tree of life. Bible does not say serpent
was the devil in disguise.
Irenaeus – the soul-making theodicy (termed by {evidential problem/a posteriori} Find the most
Hick), God allows evil in the world to let humans plausible explanation for our observations. John
develop and make our own moral decisions (eg, Stuart Mill says the natural world is full of evil,
patience, forgiveness). Without evil, we could not believes God is sadistic “nearly all the things that
appreciate good, we need to be able to compare. men are hanged or imprisoned for doing to one
Humans are made imago dei, Genesis 1:26 – “Let us another are Nature’s everyday performances”.
make mankind in our image, in our likeness”, which Arguing against supporters of the teleological
includes us having free-will (likened God as a potter argument (Paley, Aquinas). “A trifling chemical
moulding his clay) There’s a distinction between change… starves a million of people”. Says we
image and likeness – we have to grow into God’s should not be looking to God for guidance, should
likeness through acting morally with our freedom of not worship his ‘goodness’
choice, and reach our potential, by overcoming
difficulties and resisting temptations to do wrong.
(eg, Jonah and the Whale) We are not developed
enough initially (like a baby) to be in God’s likeness
as well as image. We cannot be in God’s likeness in
this world, but after death – we complete our
spiritual development in the afterlife.
John Hick (1922-2012) ‘Evil and the God of Love’ - ‘a {evidential problem/a posteriori}
world which is to be a person-making environment
cannot be a pain-free paradise but must contain
challenges and dangers’. The world is a ‘vale of soul-
making’ (borrowed from poet John Keats.
Developed Irenaeus’ theodicy to suit the 20th-
century mind, which had accepted evolution and
rejected the Augustinian theodicy (Hick also rejected

Connected book
 image
Libby Ahluwalia, Robert Bowie Oxford A Level Religious Studies for OCR
Publisher: oktober 2016 ISBN: 9780198392859 Edition: 1

Document information

Study Level
Uploaded on
January 25, 2021
Number of pages
2
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
£4.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
beckyw
4.7
(3)
Sold
35
Followers
30
Items
17
Last sold
1 year ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions