• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Start selling Create your account
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages
Lecture notes

Aqa A Level Psychology Notes - Social Influence

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages

NOTES FOR AS AND A LEVEL SOCIAL INFLUENCE

Content preview

, Social influence
Types of conformity (Hebert Kelman)
Internalisation
Occurs when a person genuinely accepts the groups norms.
Identification
Sometimes conform the opinions/ behaviours of a group because there is
something about that group that we value.
Compliance
Involves simply going along with others’ in public, but privately disagreeing.

Explanation for conformity (Morton Deutsh and Harold Gerard)
Informational social influence
The idea that we agree with the opinion of the majority because we believe it is
correct, this may lead to internalisation.
Normative social influence
The idea that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to
be accepted, this may lead to compliance.
Support for Informative social influence
Lucas et al asked students mathematical problems and found that those who
judged their mathematical abilities as poor agreed with the majority even if the
answer was more difficult and wrong.
Individual differences with Normative social influence
Naffiliators are those who have a desire/need to be liked. McGhee as Teevan found
that students high in need of affiliation were more likely to conform.
Informative and normative social influence
Both processes are involved, in Aschs experiment, the dissenter may reduce the
power of NSI or may reduce the power of ISI.

Solomon Asch
Procedure:
123 American male undergraduates were shown two large white cards, on one
card there was a standard line, on the other there were 3 lines, one matching the
line on the other card and the other 2 were clearly a different length. Each
participant was in a group of 6-8 confederates but they didn’t know. The
participants took part in 18 trials and 12 of them, the confederates purposely
answered wrong.
Findings:
The participants gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time. 75% did conform at
least once. The term ‘Asch effect’ has been used to describe this result, the extent
to which participants conform even when the situation is ambiguous, the
participants were interviewed and they said they confirmed to avoid rejection
(normative social influence).

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
March 22, 2024
Number of pages
12
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
Ms begum
Contains
All classes
£9.66

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
12
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions