Anarchism – Revision
Individual or collective?
Anarchism diff traditions, all reject state opposing coercive relationships.
Society should enable widest range of choices.
Most diverse across debate whether individualistic or collective.
P – human nature.
Ex – (I) egotistical, end state, anarcho-cap market, (c) cooperatives and shaped by environment.
Ev – Stirner, Uni of egoists, Rothbard market. Kropotkin, mutual aid benefits individuals, (P+B) order.
An – (c) do acknowledge potential for corruption, Godwin (I) most optimistic, crossover.
Ev – agree to be seen optimistically, social order nature, human nature is like plastic, molded.
P – society.
Ex – (I) fear collective > individual, (C) natural order will emerge due to social nature, bottom up.
Ev – (I) Goldman, uniformity threat, Rothbard market, Stirner x spooks, (C) Bakunin groups, K MA.
An – in (I) no level of order or hierarchy, union of egoists/market, whereas in (C) relationships.
Ev – all want no state, existing is coercive and crates for man not individual, and no blueprint.
P – economy.
Ex – (I) private property/cap fixed ideal, remove, (C) replace PP > possession, fruits, cooperatives.
Ev – Stirner, voluntary contracts, Rothbard PP yes, Proudhon possession, Bakunin collective,
Kropotkin fruits.
An – (C) communes self-managing but voluntary federations, anarcho-cap unique free w/o equality.
Ev – all say econ freedom central, private ownership opposed as exploitative, inequality opposed.
Overall see more links between (I) & (C) compared to anarcho-capitalists, like the stand-out.
Not more than another because high levels of diversity in both types/strands across area.
Is it utopian?
Society w/o state is possible and desirable has led to anarchism being linked to utopianism.
Utopianism: is the belief in the ideal or perfect society/utopia.
P – anarchism & order.
Ex – all want ordered society, humans rational, order not artificial, coercive state = disorder.
Ev – Stirner, act freely, Rothbard, market will establish order, Kropotkin, common ownership = order.
An – utopian, private property natural, liberals & conservatives, to abolish, only through state.
Ev – not all believe this, anarcho-capitalists agree private property natural aspect so not all utopian.
P – anarchism & liberty.
Ex – informs opposition to the state and influences ways in which they seek to achieve freedom.
Ev – (C) x hierarchy, Bakunin, AC, Kropotkin communities, Stirner, unrestrained, Proudhon decentral.
, Anarchism – Revision
An – conservatives, over-optimistic human nature, and then how will bad behavior be dealt with.
Ev – mutualism balance wishes to protect individual from collectivism whilst opposing cap.
P – Anti-clericalism.
Ex – target organized religion, central supporting pillar, people should obey/defy earthy authority.
Ev – all atheists or anti-clerical; except Godwin and Tolstoy, Goldman church, Bakunin if God abolish.
An – it validates a nation of unquestionable authority, supports state, and imposes a moral code.
Ev – unscientific, no history, yet anarchist societies exist like Zapatista rebellion and Rojava rebellion.
Utopianism, construction of future society allows us to see failings of current arrangement.
Anarchism can be seen as unrealistic, -ve sense, provides vision w/ o arrangements.
Role of the state?
Rejecting state, unnecessary, evil & corrupting, extends to all hierarchy, cap & religion.
Reject means to capture state w/ ballot box or rev proletariat, cos it’s unnatural construction.
P – state immoral.
Ex – ruled by physical coercion and deceit which makes it immoral.
Ev – Stirner, only ego sovereign over itself, Rothbard predatory body that steals, seizes wealth w/ tax.
An – oppressive/denies people rational sovereign individuals, replaced w/ market or Uni of Egoists.
Ev – liberals say state formed w/ consent of people; anarchists say cannot give up sovereignty.
P – state impacts human nature.
Ex – all hierarchal forms of authority, command, control corrupt, need to be abolished.
Ev – Bakunin, power to few, Goldman women unequal/oppressive relations between sexes.
An – authority corrupted, lose contact w/ selfless why dictatorship of proletariat unfeasible.
Ev – liberal good demo, Goldman illusion, if voting changed anything they would destroy it.
P – state economically exploitative.
Ex – most oppose capitalism, regard modern state as agent and creator of modern capitalism.
Ev – (C), state PP, defends wealthy, Proudhon < possession. Bakunin common, Kropotkin fruits.
An – anarcho-capitalists reject link between state & capitalism and call for a free market system.
Ev – liberalists good demo, Bakunin unless econ equality, no political equality, voting = smokescreen.
Therefore, role of state is to cease to exist, to allow a society without a state.
w/o interference & coercive relations, harmony of interests will emerge among humans.
Harmony is a spontaneous order; Proudhon says freedom is mother not daughter of order.
Is it just a form of socialism?
Anarchism too diverse, range of ideas, believed to become cross-sectioned with socialism.
Explored through diff areas and argued due to divisions in diff types of anarchism.
Individual or collective?
Anarchism diff traditions, all reject state opposing coercive relationships.
Society should enable widest range of choices.
Most diverse across debate whether individualistic or collective.
P – human nature.
Ex – (I) egotistical, end state, anarcho-cap market, (c) cooperatives and shaped by environment.
Ev – Stirner, Uni of egoists, Rothbard market. Kropotkin, mutual aid benefits individuals, (P+B) order.
An – (c) do acknowledge potential for corruption, Godwin (I) most optimistic, crossover.
Ev – agree to be seen optimistically, social order nature, human nature is like plastic, molded.
P – society.
Ex – (I) fear collective > individual, (C) natural order will emerge due to social nature, bottom up.
Ev – (I) Goldman, uniformity threat, Rothbard market, Stirner x spooks, (C) Bakunin groups, K MA.
An – in (I) no level of order or hierarchy, union of egoists/market, whereas in (C) relationships.
Ev – all want no state, existing is coercive and crates for man not individual, and no blueprint.
P – economy.
Ex – (I) private property/cap fixed ideal, remove, (C) replace PP > possession, fruits, cooperatives.
Ev – Stirner, voluntary contracts, Rothbard PP yes, Proudhon possession, Bakunin collective,
Kropotkin fruits.
An – (C) communes self-managing but voluntary federations, anarcho-cap unique free w/o equality.
Ev – all say econ freedom central, private ownership opposed as exploitative, inequality opposed.
Overall see more links between (I) & (C) compared to anarcho-capitalists, like the stand-out.
Not more than another because high levels of diversity in both types/strands across area.
Is it utopian?
Society w/o state is possible and desirable has led to anarchism being linked to utopianism.
Utopianism: is the belief in the ideal or perfect society/utopia.
P – anarchism & order.
Ex – all want ordered society, humans rational, order not artificial, coercive state = disorder.
Ev – Stirner, act freely, Rothbard, market will establish order, Kropotkin, common ownership = order.
An – utopian, private property natural, liberals & conservatives, to abolish, only through state.
Ev – not all believe this, anarcho-capitalists agree private property natural aspect so not all utopian.
P – anarchism & liberty.
Ex – informs opposition to the state and influences ways in which they seek to achieve freedom.
Ev – (C) x hierarchy, Bakunin, AC, Kropotkin communities, Stirner, unrestrained, Proudhon decentral.
, Anarchism – Revision
An – conservatives, over-optimistic human nature, and then how will bad behavior be dealt with.
Ev – mutualism balance wishes to protect individual from collectivism whilst opposing cap.
P – Anti-clericalism.
Ex – target organized religion, central supporting pillar, people should obey/defy earthy authority.
Ev – all atheists or anti-clerical; except Godwin and Tolstoy, Goldman church, Bakunin if God abolish.
An – it validates a nation of unquestionable authority, supports state, and imposes a moral code.
Ev – unscientific, no history, yet anarchist societies exist like Zapatista rebellion and Rojava rebellion.
Utopianism, construction of future society allows us to see failings of current arrangement.
Anarchism can be seen as unrealistic, -ve sense, provides vision w/ o arrangements.
Role of the state?
Rejecting state, unnecessary, evil & corrupting, extends to all hierarchy, cap & religion.
Reject means to capture state w/ ballot box or rev proletariat, cos it’s unnatural construction.
P – state immoral.
Ex – ruled by physical coercion and deceit which makes it immoral.
Ev – Stirner, only ego sovereign over itself, Rothbard predatory body that steals, seizes wealth w/ tax.
An – oppressive/denies people rational sovereign individuals, replaced w/ market or Uni of Egoists.
Ev – liberals say state formed w/ consent of people; anarchists say cannot give up sovereignty.
P – state impacts human nature.
Ex – all hierarchal forms of authority, command, control corrupt, need to be abolished.
Ev – Bakunin, power to few, Goldman women unequal/oppressive relations between sexes.
An – authority corrupted, lose contact w/ selfless why dictatorship of proletariat unfeasible.
Ev – liberal good demo, Goldman illusion, if voting changed anything they would destroy it.
P – state economically exploitative.
Ex – most oppose capitalism, regard modern state as agent and creator of modern capitalism.
Ev – (C), state PP, defends wealthy, Proudhon < possession. Bakunin common, Kropotkin fruits.
An – anarcho-capitalists reject link between state & capitalism and call for a free market system.
Ev – liberalists good demo, Bakunin unless econ equality, no political equality, voting = smokescreen.
Therefore, role of state is to cease to exist, to allow a society without a state.
w/o interference & coercive relations, harmony of interests will emerge among humans.
Harmony is a spontaneous order; Proudhon says freedom is mother not daughter of order.
Is it just a form of socialism?
Anarchism too diverse, range of ideas, believed to become cross-sectioned with socialism.
Explored through diff areas and argued due to divisions in diff types of anarchism.
