100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

Contract Law Damages

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
24-03-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Lecture notes study book Contract Law of Jan M. Smits (-) - ISBN: 9781785368783, Edition: 2nd edition, Year of publication: - (Contract Law)









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 24, 2021
Number of pages
3
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
N/a
Contains
All classes

Content preview

Wednesday, 9 December 2020

Damages 2

Contract Law
Non Pecuniary Losses Continued.

• Damages are not normally available for non-pecuniary loss although in some
exceptional cases it may be awarded if the loss was consequent on physical injury or
inconvenience or the contract was for the purpose of enjoyment or alleviation of
distress.

• General Rule is best illustrated in Addis v Gramophone Co. Ltd (1909) where the court
refused damages for injured feelings caused by humiliating and wrongful dismissal.
However, there have always been exceptions for pain and suffering consequent upon
personal injury and for actual physical inconvenience, as in Bailey v Bullock (1950)
where a breach of contract caused the claimant to have to live with his in-laws.

A breakthrough in English Law was made in Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd (1973) ;

• Claimant was promised a ‘great time’ for holiday that cost £63, was awarded £125
when awarded £125 when he did not get it.

• Two Exceptional Categories were identified: main purpose of the contract was to
provide mental satisfaction - where the mental distress suffered was as a direct
consequence of physical injury or inconvenience caused by the defendants breach
(Perry v Sydney Phillips (1982) breach by a surveyor led the claimant to buy a
house that was falling down and smelt, this physical damage and inconvenience
caused the claimant mental distress.

• The House of Lords in Farley v Skinner (2001) - exceptions to the general rule that
damages are only available for physical and financial losses and extended the
range of the exceptions << Difference in value or cost of cure.

Mitigation

• The claimant is under a duty to take reasonable steps to put himself in the position
he would have been in had the contract been performed (i.e to minimise his lost
expectantions)

• The Claimant is allowed to recover any cost reasonably incurred in an attempt to
mitigate.

• Any benefits accused to the claimant by reason of the breach will reduce the
claimants damages, but not if they are ‘collateral’ and would have accrued anyway.




1
£8.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
parisedwards

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
parisedwards
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
2
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions