100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

WGU D459 Task 3 Four Steps Tool Actual Submission Example and Guide 2026/2027 | Passed Assessment | Step-by-Step Template | Pass Guarantee

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
16
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
22-12-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

PASS WGU D459 TASK 3 ON YOUR FIRST ATTEMPT WITH AN ACTUAL SUBMISSION EXAMPLE FOR 2026/2027! This resource provides a complete, passed Four Steps Tool submission with detailed annotations, step-by-step guidance, and template. Your definitive solution for mastering this performance assessment and meeting all rubric requirements efficiently. This is not just instructions—this is an actual passed submission from WGU's D459 Task 3, updated for the 2026/2027 academic year. The resource includes the complete Four Steps Tool document with annotations explaining why each section meets rubric criteria, common pitfalls to avoid, and a customizable template you can adapt for your own submission. This ensures you understand not just what to submit, but why it passes WGU's rigorous assessment standards. WHAT THIS D459 TASK 3 RESOURCE INCLUDES: ACTUAL PASSED SUBMISSION of the Four Steps Tool from WGU D459 Task 3 (2026/2027) DETAILED ANNOTATIONS explaining how each section meets rubric requirements COMPLETE STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE for developing your own successful submission CUSTOMIZABLE TEMPLATE - Ready-to-use structure for your assessment RUBRIC ALIGNMENT FOCUS - Direct mapping to WGU's performance assessment criteria 2026/2027 REQUIREMENTS - Updated for current academic year expectations COMMON MISTAKES TO AVOID - Insights from previously failed submissions Stop guessing what evaluators want. Get the actual submission that provides the definitive blueprint for D459 Task 3 success. Purchase now and submit your Four Steps Tool with confidence!

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
WGU D459
Vak
WGU D459










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
WGU D459
Vak
WGU D459

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
22 december 2025
Aantal pagina's
16
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

1



WGU D459 Task 3 Four Steps Tool Actual
Submission Example and Guide 2026/2027 |
Passed Assessment | Step-by-Step Template |
Pass Guarantee

PART 1: STEP ONE – DEFINING THE PROBLEM
1A. What is the problem?
The central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate in the
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at Regional Medical Center has increased to 2.8
infections per 1,000 central line days over the past six months, which exceeds the
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) benchmark of 1.0 per 1,000 central
line days and represents a 75% increase from the facility's baseline rate of 1.6 per
1,000 central line days established in the prior year. This elevated infection rate has
resulted in three preventable adverse patient events during the measurement period,
extended ICU length of stay for affected patients by an average of 7.2 days per
case, and generated approximately $132,000 in non-reimbursable costs associated
with treatment of hospital-acquired infections under current Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) value-based purchasing penalties.
1B. Why is it a problem?
This problem poses significant threats across multiple dimensions of healthcare
quality and organizational performance. From a patient safety perspective,
CLABSIs are associated with mortality rates ranging from 12-25%, cause
substantial patient suffering through prolonged hospitalization and additional
invasive treatments, and represent a preventable harm that contradicts the
fundamental principle of "first, do no harm." For clinical staff, the elevated
infection rate creates moral distress among ICU nurses and physicians who are
committed to evidence-based practice, increases workload burden through complex
infection management protocols, and potentially indicates gaps in adherence to
established central line maintenance bundles that undermine professional practice

, 2


standards. At the organizational level, this problem directly impacts quality metrics
reported to regulatory agencies including The Joint Commission's National Patient
Safety Goal 07.04.01 for catheter-associated infection prevention, triggers financial
penalties under the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program that can
reduce total Medicare reimbursement by 1%, damages the institution's reputation
in publicly reported Hospital Compare quality scores, and exposes the organization
to potential litigation risk. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ) estimates that each CLABSI costs between $16,550 and $44,000 in
additional healthcare expenditure, none of which is reimbursable under current
payment models, creating a direct negative impact on the organization's financial
sustainability and its capacity to invest in quality improvement infrastructure and
staff development programs.
1C. What is the scope of the problem?
This problem is specifically scoped to the 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care
unit (MSICU) at Regional Medical Center, encompassing all three shifts (day,
evening, and night) and all patient populations requiring central venous access for
a duration exceeding 48 hours. The analysis includes patients with peripherally
inserted central catheters (PICCs), subclavian lines, internal jugular lines, and
femoral lines, but excludes dialysis catheters managed by the nephrology service
and temporary pacing wires managed by cardiothoracic surgery, as these fall under
separate protocols and surveillance systems. The temporal scope covers the six-
month period from October 2026 through March 2027, and geographically is
limited to the MSICU on the fourth floor; other ICU environments such as the
cardiovascular ICU, surgical ICU, and neonatal ICU are not included in this
analysis as they maintain separate nursing leadership, distinct patient populations,
and independent quality improvement structures. The process scope encompasses
central line maintenance practices including dressing changes, cap changes, tubing
changes, access port disinfection, and daily necessity assessments, but does NOT
include initial central line insertion procedures performed by physicians or
advanced practice providers, as insertion technique is governed by a separate
credentialing and competency system under medical staff bylaws. The stakeholder
scope includes ICU registered nurses, ICU nurse managers, infection
preventionists, intensivist physicians, and ICU clinical nurse specialists, but does

, 3


not extend to environmental services, pharmacy, or ancillary departments at this
phase of analysis.


PART 2: STEP TWO – IDENTIFYING CAUSES
2A. Primary Cause (Root Cause):
The fundamental root cause of the elevated CLABSI rate is the absence of a
standardized, enforceable central line maintenance bundle protocol that ensures
consistent adherence to evidence-based practices across all nursing shifts in the
MSICU. A root cause analysis conducted using the "Five Whys" methodology
revealed that while the organization has a written central line maintenance policy
document, there is no systematic mechanism to verify that the policy elements are
performed correctly and completely during every patient-care interaction involving
central venous access. Specifically, the current system relies on individual nurse
judgment and memory to execute the seven components of the maintenance bundle
(hand hygiene, port disinfection with appropriate dwell time, sterile technique for
dressing changes, assessment of site integrity, documentation of necessity, timely
dressing changes based on manufacturer guidelines, and use of chlorhexidine-
impregnated dressings), without standardized visual cues, checklists, or real-time
verification systems. This lack of standardization creates variation in practice
based on individual nurse training background, workload pressures, interruptions
during care delivery, and differing interpretations of "appropriate" technique.
Further analysis revealed that the nursing staff turnover rate of 18% in the past year
resulted in a cohort of nurses with less than one year of ICU experience comprising
35% of the current MSICU workforce, and these nurses received abbreviated
onboarding during a period of staffing crisis that did not include competency
validation for central line maintenance beyond initial didactic instruction. The
absence of a forcing function or verification system means that protocol
deviations—whether due to knowledge gaps, time pressure, or workflow
interruptions—are not detected or corrected in real time, allowing non-compliant
practices to become normalized and perpetuating the conditions that enable
CLABSI development.
2B. Contributing Factors:

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
STUVIAACTUALEXAMS University Of California - Los Angeles (UCLA)
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
621
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
200
Documenten
4286
Laatst verkocht
19 uur geleden
Actual Exam

STUVIAACTUALEXAMS is a trusted exam-success delivering accurate, verified, and exam-focused study materials that include real exam-style questions, correct answers, and clear, easy-to-follow rationales, all professionally organized to save time, eliminate guesswork, reduce stress, boost confidence, and help students secure top grades and pass their exams on the first attempt with certainty and ease.

3.6

82 beoordelingen

5
36
4
12
3
12
2
7
1
15

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen