100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Criminal Law (LL1003)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Uploaded on
19-02-2021
Written in
2019/2020

Lecture notes on the topic of Actus Reus

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 19, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Lecture 2: Actus Reus
• Building Blocks of Criminal Liability:
o Actus Reus+ Mens Reau- Defences
o Actus Reus- external element, physical act of omission of the offence
• Basics of Actus Reus:
o “Guilty Act”- however may not always be an act- which is why it is defined as
external element
▪ Criminal liability is impossible to assign to any person without the Actus
Reus
▪ Criminal law punishes for behaviour not thoughts- how do you prove this?
o
▪ Actus Reus must be voluntary:
• Individual freedom, responsibility
o No general obligation to prevent harm:
▪ No Good Samaritan Principal: Helping fellow people
• However, there are some example in English Law there is some
obligation to Act
• Omissions:
o Defendant who is under some duty has the duty to act
o Some offences cannot be admitted by omission: depriving people of their homes
o Specific crime where the failure to act is itself a criminal act:
▪ Road Traffic Act:
• E.g. if police officer asks for breath test- if you refuse to give the test
it is a criminal offence
• E.g. If you get into an accident legally you must stop even if it is not
your fault- fail to stop or fail to give insurance detail that is a
criminal offence
• E.g. Terrorism Act: If you work for a bank or company where you
know or have suspicion that money is being used to funds Terrorist
it is an offence to not report it to the authorities
• Misconduct whilst acting as officer of justice: failure to do
something
• Special Relationships:
o Special relationship between the defendant or the victim
o Gibbins and Proctor 1918:
▪ Married couple- father was Gibbens and he married Proctor- step mother of
children
▪ Gave wife money for food etc
▪ Youngest child was deprived of food and was starved to death
▪ Wife was not investing in feeding the child- only girl
▪ Not proven that it was deliberate
▪ Charge with murder and convicted
▪ Defence- we did not kill the child just fail to feed
▪ Gibbins convicted that he was the father and he had responsibility- he had
the special relationships
▪ Proctor was the stepmother
o Smith:
$10.87
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
bareeraahmed

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
bareeraahmed Royal Holloway University of London (London)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
4
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions