Flowers Campaign in order to strengthen his political control?
It is partly accurate to say that Mao Zedong carried out the Hundred Flowers
Campaign in order to strengthen his political power over China. Initially
launched on the 2nd of May 1956, the hundred flowers campaign was a
movement where Mao encouraged the intellectuals of China to provide
criticisms to how the CCP organised themselves. Mao declared ‘let a hundred
flowers bloom, let a hundred school of thoughts contend’ as perhaps Mao
aimed to use this campaign to prove to Chinese citizens that their opinions
regarding the growth of the country- whether its socially, economically,
politically or culturally- matters. This eventually took a wrong turn as the
overwhelming criticism from the intellectuals shocked Mao, making him
realise that even after preceding years of consolidating his power over China
using terror and violence, - the three and five antis of 1951-52, the creation
of the Laogai system in 1955...- people were still critical over the
government. This excessive criticism led to the introduction of the Anti-
Rightist Campaign of July 1957 whereby any intellectual that criticised Mao
and the CCP; they were persecuted as they were labelled as ‘poisonous
weeds.’ Therefore, I agree to an extent that the hundred flowers campaign
was a way for Mao to secure his political power because it is evident that in
previous years, Mao did not shy away from using violence to ensure Chinese
citizens conform.
It can be argued that Mao truly aimed to use the hundred flowers campaign
as a way to allow freedom of expression for the Chinese citizens. On the
surface, this campaign was an intelligent move by Mao to convince the
people that he listened to them, especially because before this campaign,
there was a series of violence and brutality to emphasise that submission to
Mao’s communist regime is the only option. This campaign gave a voice to
the people who were previously coerced to submit and remain silent.
Although Mao’s true intentions for launching the campaign continues to be
debated, it can be argued that Mao was overconfident in his work and party
because of his previous successes- Defeating the Nationalists, the first five-
year plan etc. He may have genuinely believed that there would be no
criticisms to the way the party was organised, so the campaign was just a
way of providing reassurance to Mao that he is an adept leader, and his
policies are leading to the emergence of China as a superpower.
Furthermore, Mao seemed to take responsibility for his persecution of people
,as they tape recorded a speech where he admitted that ‘the party wrongly
identified intellectuals as enemies of the regime and used to much force to
control them.’ He also conveyed that ‘800,000 Chinese had been killed, he
implied that the time for violent class struggle is over, and that people were
going to be released from labour camps.’ This shows that perhaps Mao
truthfully wanted people to trust the government and not just trust the
government because they were forced to. This suggests that Mao was
enthusiastic to hear the intellectuals' opinions but due to the staggering
amount of criticisms, Mao had to act immediately and was forced to use
violence to restrict the rise of opposition. Although this is a plausible
argument, it fails to consider the idea that Mao was very comfortable using
violence to implement his authority during the three and five antis'
movement of 1951-52 and the Laogai system of 1955. This therefore makes
this argument of the hundred flowers campaign being a mere disaster
skeptical because Mao had adopted power through violence suggesting that
he is capable of connivingly putting down opposition using terror.
Thus, it can rather be argued that Mao aimed to use the hundred flowers
campaign to destroy his opposition and strengthen his political control. This
is evident in the Yan’an rectification movement in the earlier days of Mao’s
government as then,he encouraged party members to highlight any
mistakes in the party’s organisation and tactics so that the party could
effectively improve. This ultimately led to the critics of the CCP to be
rounded up and attacked for expressing ‘individualism’. It could be argued
that this same strategy was applied by Mao to the hundred flowers
campaign, perhaps suggesting that Mao always aimed to introduce the Anti-
Rightist campaign. Although historians are unsure of what Mao’s plans truly
were, this comparison of these campaigns allows for a form of conclusion to
be reached- Mao was used to integrating violence in several other campaigns
so it could be viewed that Mao always planned this. However, several reports
said that Mao was depressed after the overwhelming criticisms which
suggests that Mao’s intentions were genuine. This is a weak argument
because Mao should have prepared himself for these criticisms rather, he
was overconfident- If he prepared himself, he would have had answers to the
concerns, yet he chose violence once again to silence his critics. Therefore,
the argument that Mao carried out the hundred flowers campaign to
strengthen his political power is strong because it considers the idea that
Mao always resorts to violence and oppression any time he is challenged so
the easiest way for Mao to solidify this position as the leader of China was to
, force people once again, even though that was everything that the hundred
flowers campaign advocated against.
However, it could still be argued that Mao truly wanted the opinions of the
intellectuals especially because of the events in Russia. After the death of
Stalin on the 5th of March 1953, Nikita Khrushchev took over and
implemented a period of ‘destalinisation’ where everything that was
associated with Stalin was destroyed. Khrushchev was very critical of
Stalin's’ ideologies and methods. This made Mao very nervous because he
had already begun to ‘develop a strong personality cult and many of his
terror policies mirrored those of Stalin.’ This made him worried that he was
going to be targeted too, and so he sought a way to prove that he was not a
dictator. This led to the hundred flowers campaign as he aimed for
intellectuals to criticise him in a peaceful way that meant that he could
improve the party. This did not go to plan, and Mao even reinforced the idea
that he was indeed a dictator because he ordered the silencing of his critics.
He proved that he was not ready for the party to be criticised so heavily.
Although the argument of international concerns is valid, it is still evident
that Mao acted in the way that a dictator would, ironically reiterating that his
ideologies are similar to those of Stallins’ were violence is emphasised.
Therefore, the more plausible argument is that Mao was threatened that his
position was not secure, so he found a solution that used terror.
Moreover, Mao slyly changed the slogan of the hundred flowers campaign
from ‘flowers’ to ‘poisonous weeds’ which was used to describe the right-
wingers who were enemies to the CCP. Understanding that during the Anti-
Rightist campaign, 400,000-700,000 people were purged, it shows the
severity of the campaign and suggests that due the massive number of
people persecuted, Mao planned this. Mao persecuted people that dared to
speak against him, even though he encouraged them to do so- This further
ingrained fear into the minds of the Chinese citizens as they reason that
Mao’s words cannot be trusted and so they continue to conform. This allowed
Mao to further establish his control over China because he continued to show
that he was a dictator that did not see eye to eye with any form of free
speech and rights- This reinforces the idea that China could never be a
democratic country. Additionally, the Anti-Rightist campaign led to a lot of
critics of Mao to commit suicide because they had a fear of being denounced
in ‘struggle meetings’ emphasising that Mao had instilled so much fear into
people that by them simply conveying their opinions, they were at risk of
taking their own life. This is a strong argument because it takes into the
consideration the large amounts of people that were purged referencing to