100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

HED4812 Assignment 3 Reflective Journal (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 20 November 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
11
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
19-11-2025
Written in
2025/2026

HED4812 Assignment 3 Reflective Journal (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 20 November 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us...Reflective Journal Assignment The reflective journal is designed to encourage critical thinking, self-awareness, and the application of theoretical concepts to practical scenarios. Students will respond to three topics, reflecting on their understanding, experiences, and insights. Reflective Journal Format 1. Introduction (50–100 words): Briefly introduce the topic and its relevance to educational leadership. 2. Reflection (400–450 words): Address the guiding questions, integrating theoretical concepts, personal experiences, and critical insights. 3. Conclusion (50–100 words): Summarize key takeaways and reflect on how the topic has influenced your understanding of educational leadership. Marking Rubric for Reflective Journal (100 Marks) 1. Depth of Reflection (30 Marks) • Excellent (27–30): Demonstrates deep critical thinking and self-awareness. Integrates theoretical concepts with personal experiences and insights. • Good (22–26): Provides thoughtful reflection but may lack depth in connecting theory to practice. • Satisfactory (15–21): Offers basic reflection with limited critical analysis or personal insights. • Needs Improvement (0–14): Fails to demonstrate meaningful reflection or critical thinking. 2. Application of Theory (25 Marks) • Excellent (23–25): Effectively applies relevant theories and concepts to the topic. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the subject matter. • Good (18–22): Applies theories but may lack depth or fail to fully connect them to the reflection. • Satisfactory (12–17): Mentions theories but provides limited explanation or application. • Needs Improvement (0–11): Fails to apply relevant theories or concepts. 3. Personal Insights and Examples (25 Marks) • Excellent (23–25): Provides rich personal insights and relevant examples that enhance the reflection. Demonstrates a strong connection to real-world experiences. • Good (18–22): Shares personal insights and examples but may lack depth or relevance. • Satisfactory (12–17): Offers basic insights and examples but with limited connection to the topic. • Needs Improvement (0–11): Fails to provide meaningful personal insights or examples. 4. Structure and Clarity (10 Marks) • Excellent (9–10): Well-organized, clear, and concise. Flows logically and is easy to follow. • Good (7–8)Explore the principles and practices of indigenous and traditional leadership (e.g., Ubuntu, collectivism, servant leadership, and community-centred approaches). • How do these principles differ from Western leadership models, and what can modern educational leaders learn from them? : Generally clear and organized but may have minor issues with flow or coherence. • Satisfactory (5–6): Basic structure but may lack clarity or logical progression. • Needs Improvement (0–4): Poorly structured and difficult to follow. 5. Language and Reflect on the role of leadership in managing crises (e.g., natural disasters, pandemics, financial crises, or social unrest). Presentation (10 Marks) • Excellent (9–10): Uses professional, academic language with no grammatical or spelling errors. • Good (7–8): Minor errors in language or presentation that do not detract froReflect on how indigenous and traditional leadership practices can be integrated into contemporary educational settings. • Share personal insights or examples of how these principles could address challenges in your school or organization.m readability. • Satisfactory (5–6): Several errors in language or presentation that affect readability. • Needs Improvement (0–4): Frequent errors that significantly detract from readability. Total Marks: 100 Grade BoundariesWhat qualities and strategies are essential for agile leadership during a crisis? • How can leaders balance short-term crisis response with long-term organizational goals? • Share an example of a crisis (real or hypothetical) and discuss how you would apply agile leadership principles to navigate it.: • 90–100: Outstanding – Exceptional depth of reflection, application of theory, and personal insights. Well-structured and professionally presented. • 80–89: Reflect on the school as a complex system with interconnected parts (e.g., teachers, students, parents, administration, and the community). • How do the different components of the school system interact, and what impact does this have on overall effectiveness? Excellent – Strong reflection with minor areas for improvement in depth, theory application, or structure. • 70–79: Good – Solid reflection but lacks consistency or depth in certain areas. • 60–69: What challenges arise when managing a school as an organization, and how can systems thinking help address these challenges? • Provide examples from your own experiences or observations. Satisfactory – Meets basic requirements but lacks depth, originality, or clarity. • 50–59: Needs Improvement – Demonstrates limited understanding or effort. • 0–49: Unsatisfactory – Fails to meet the requirements of the task. This reflective journal structure and rubric encourage students to engage deeply with the topics, apply theoretical concepts, and reflect on their personal experiences and insights. It also emphasizes clarity, structure, and professional presentation Reflective Journal Assignment The reflective journal is designed to encourage critical thinking, self-awareness, and the application of theoretical concepts to practical scenarios. Students will respond to three topics, reflecting on their understanding, experiences, and insights. Reflective Journal Format 1. Introduction (50–100 words): Briefly introduce the topic and its relevance to educational leadership. 2. Reflection (400–450 words): Address the guiding questions, integrating theoretical concepts, personal experiences, and critical insights. 3. Conclusion (50–100 words): Summarize key takeaways and reflect on how the topic has influenced your understanding of educational leadership. Marking Rubric for Reflective Journal (100 Marks) 1. Depth of Reflection (30 Marks) • Excellent (27–30): Demonstrates deep critical thinking and self-awareness. Integrates theoretical concepts with personal experiences and insights. • Good (22–26): Provides thoughtful reflection but may lack depth in connecting theory to practice. • Satisfactory (15–21): Offers basic reflection with limited critical analysis or personal insights. • Needs Improvement (0–14): Fails to demonstrate meaningful reflection or critical thinking. 2. Application of Theory (25 Marks) • Excellent (23–25): Effectively applies relevant theories and concepts to the topic. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the subject matter. • Good (18–22): Applies theories but may lack depth or fail to fully connect them to the reflection. • Satisfactory (12–17): Mentions theories but provides limited explanation or application. • Needs Improvement (0–11): Fails to apply relevant theories or concepts. 3. Personal Insights and Examples (25 Marks) • Excellent (23–25): Provides rich personal insights and relevant examples that enhance the reflection. Demonstrates a strong connection to real-world experiences. • Good (18–22): Shares personal insights and examples but may lack depth or relevance. • Satisfactory (12–17): Offers basic insights and examples but with limited connection to the topic. • Needs Improvement (0–11): Fails to provide meaningful personal insights or examples. 4. Structure and Clarity (10 Marks) • Excellent (9–10): Well-organized, clear, and concise. Flows logically and is easy to follow. • Good (7–8)Explore the principles and practices of indigenous and traditional leadership (e.g., Ubuntu, collectivism, servant leadership, and community-centred approaches). • How do these principles differ from Western leadership models, and what can modern educational leaders learn from them? : Generally clear and organized but may have minor issues with flow or coherence. • Satisfactory (5–6): Basic structure but may lack clarity or logical progression. • Needs Improvement (0–4): Poorly structured and difficult to follow. 5. Language and Reflect on the role of leadership in managing crises (e.g., natural disasters, pandemics, financial crises, or social unrest). Presentation (10 Marks) • Excellent (9–10): Uses professional, academic language with no grammatical or spelling errors. • Good (7–8): Minor errors in language or presentation that do not detract froReflect on how indigenous and traditional leadership practices can be integrated into contemporary educational settings. • Share personal insights or examples of how these principles could address challenges in your school or organization.m readability. • Satisfactory (5–6): Several errors in language or presentation that affect readability. • Needs Improvement (0–4): Frequent errors that significantly detract from readability. Total Marks: 100 Grade BoundariesWhat qualities and strategies are essential for agile leadership during a crisis? • How can leaders balance short-term crisis response with long-term organizational goals? • Share an example of a crisis (real or hypothetical) and discuss how you would apply agile leadership principles to navigate it.: • 90–100: Outstanding – Exceptional depth of reflection, application of theory, and personal insights. Well-structured and professionally presented. • 80–89: Reflect on the school as a complex system with interconnected parts (e.g., teachers, students, parents, administration, and the community). • How do the different components of the school system interact, and what impact does this have on overall effectiveness? Excellent – Strong reflection with minor areas for improvement in depth, theory application, or structure. • 70–79: Good – Solid reflection but lacks consistency or depth in certain areas. • 60–69: What challenges arise when managing a school as an organization, and how can systems thinking help address these challenges? • Provide examples from your own experiences or observations. Satisfactory – Meets basic requirements but lacks depth, originality, or clarity. • 50–59: Needs Improvement – Demonstrates limited understanding or effort. • 0–49: Unsatisfactory – Fails to meet the requirements of the task. This reflective journal structure and rubric encourage students to engage deeply with the topics, apply theoretical concepts, and reflect on their personal experiences and insights. It also emphasizes clarity, structure, and professional presentation

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
November 19, 2025
Number of pages
11
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

HED4812
Assignment 3 2025
REFLECTIVE JOURNAL
Unique number:
Due Date: 8 November 2025

1. THE SCHOOL AS A SYSTEM/ORGANIZATION

1. Introduction

Schools are not just buildings where learners attend classes. They are living systems made
up of people who work together in different ways. In South Africa, where many communities
face poverty, inequality and lack of resources, schools often reflect the problems of the wider
society. This makes the work of school leaders more complex. Understanding the school as
a system helps leaders to make better choices, support everyone involved, and create
environments where both teaching and learning can succeed.

2. Reflection

When I think about the school as a system, I picture it like a garden. Each part of the garden
depends on the others to grow well. If one section is neglected, it affects the whole space. In
the same way, schools are made up of different people and roles, teachers, learners,
Terms of use
parents, principals, support staff, and the larger community. These parts must work together.
By making use of this document you agree to:
If the teachers are motivated butUse this document
learners comeastoa school
guide forhungry
learning,or
comparison
parents and are reference purpose,
not involved,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
then the learning process suffers. By making use of this document you agree to:
 Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Use this document solely as a guide for learning, reference, and comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 67 171 1739



1. THE SCHOOL AS A SYSTEM/ORGANIZATION

1. Introduction

Schools are not just buildings where learners attend classes. They are living systems
made up of people who work together in different ways. In South Africa, where many
communities face poverty, inequality and lack of resources, schools often reflect the
problems of the wider society. This makes the work of school leaders more complex.
Understanding the school as a system helps leaders to make better choices, support
everyone involved, and create environments where both teaching and learning can
succeed.

2. Reflection

When I think about the school as a system, I picture it like a garden. Each part of the
garden depends on the others to grow well. If one section is neglected, it affects the whole
space. In the same way, schools are made up of different people and roles, teachers,
learners, parents, principals, support staff, and the larger community. These parts must
work together. If the teachers are motivated but learners come to school hungry or parents
are not involved, then the learning process suffers.

In my own experience working with schools in Limpopo, I have seen how important these
connections are. In one township school, the principal worked closely with parents through
regular meetings and home visits. This helped learners improve attendance and
behaviour. When parents felt respected and included, they were more supportive at home,
which made the teachers’ jobs easier too. The school became more effective because
everyone was playing their part.

But in another school I visited, there was a clear breakdown. The teachers were frustrated
because they were overworked and received little support from the school management.
Parents rarely came to meetings, and learners often skipped classes. In this case, the
system was broken in several places. It showed me that each part of the school system
depends on the others to function well.

Managing a school as an organisation comes with many challenges. One major problem is
communication. Sometimes information does not flow properly between the school
leadership and the rest of the staff. Another issue is the shortage of resources, like
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
149175
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
35995
Documents
4335
Last sold
1 hour ago

4.2

13559 reviews

5
7806
4
2688
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions