100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Cf_mos_and_sds Motivating Operations and Discriminative Stimuli

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
6
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
13-11-2025
Written in
2025/2026

The document is an academic paper from an "Advanced Concepts in Applied Behavior Analysis" course that defines, compares, and illustrates the concepts of Motivating Operations (MOs) and Discriminative Stimuli ($text{S}^text{D}$s), two key antecedent variables in operant conditioning.DescriptionThe paper examines the similarities and differences between Motivating Operations (MOs) and Discriminative Stimuli ($text{S}^text{D}$s) and provides three narrative examples of how these variables work together to influence behavior.Comparison of MOs and $text{S}^text{D}$sFeatureSimilaritiesDifferencesTypeBoth are antecedent variables (occur before the behavior) and operant variables that act as behavior stimuli1.$text{S}^text{D}$s reinforce behavior by providing a link to the differential accessibility of an effective motivator2.FunctionBoth influence the current frequency of behavior reinforced by a specific stimulus (elicit behavior-altering effects)3.MOs provide the differential strengthening and alter the value of reinforcers to the behavior4.SignalingBoth are catalysts for behavioral modification5.$text{S}^text{D}$s signal the availability of reinforcers and discriminate appropriately (providing a cue)6. MOs do not prompt any signs for the availability of reinforcement7.MechanismMOs account for satiation or deprivation for a particular reinforcer8. $text{S}^text{D}$s alter the level of motivation by signaling the availability of reinforcement to acquire it9.Examples of MOs and $text{S}^text{D}$s Working TogetherThe paper illustrates their joint function with three scenarios:MO: Feeling hungry (deprivation increases the value of food as a reinforcer). $text{S}^text{D}$: Seeing a sandwich signpost (signals that sandwiches, the desired item, are available).MO: Freezing in the cold (unconditioned motivation increases the value of warmth/a jacket as a reinforcer). $text{S}^text{D}$: The thought/sight of a jacket in a boutique (signals the availability of the reinforcer).MO: Desperation/Need for a clue on how to complete a research paper (increases the value of information/algorithms as a reinforcer). $text{S}^text{D}$: Seeing a book with a relevant chapter (signals the availability of the information).In summary, the paper concludes that Motivating Operations represent events that encourage or motivate the occurrence of a behavior (the reinforcers that evoke an action)16. Discriminative Stimuli are identified as the setters of the occasion for a behavior's occurrence, which has already been reinforced in the past17.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
November 13, 2025
Number of pages
6
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+

Content preview

1




Cf_mos_and_sds Motivating Operations and Discriminative Stimuli




Your name

Capella University

PSY5280: Advanced Concepts in Applied Behavior Analysis

Dr. Lisa Sabato

Due date

, 2



Motivating Operations and Discriminative Stimuli


Similarities (3): Differences (3)

 Both are antecedent variables,  A DS is a stimulus that can reinforce a
implying that they act as behavior behaviour due to providing linkage to
stimuli, reinforcing the occurrence of the differential accessibility of an
a specific behaviour (Poling, effective motivator for the behaviour.
Lotfizadeh & Edwards, 2019). On the contrary, motivating operations
 Both are operant variables, to imply (MOs) provide the differential
that they are both catalysts of strengthening and alter the value of
behavioral modification to reinforce or reinforcers to the behavior
maintain behavior (Cooper, Heron & (Miltenberger, 2024).
Heward, 2019).  DS signals the availability of
 They both elicit behavior-altering reinforces, and discriminate
effects. That is, they influence the appropriately (providing a cue to
current frequency of behavior signal effective reinforcement for a
reinforced by a specific stimulus behavior). In contrast, MO does not
(Miltenberger, 2024). prompt any signs for the availability
of reinforcement (Cooper, Heron &
Heward, 2019).
 MO accounts for satiation or
deprivations for a particular reinforcer,
whereas DS alters the level of
motivation to the stimulus, object, or
event by signaling the availability of
reinforcement to getting or acquiring it
(Poling, Lotfizadeh & Edwards, 2019.




MO’s and Sd’s Working Together



Example 1
MO: Feeling hungry
SD: Seeing a sandwich signpost
$10.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
samhia

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
samhia Capella University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
3 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
280
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions