100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and Treatment 2026 (65th Ed.) — Complete Internal Medicine Test Bank | 20 MCQs/Chapter with Answers & Rationales

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
695
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-11-2025
Written in
2025/2026

CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and Treatment 2026 (65th Ed.) — Complete Internal Medicine Test Bank | 20 MCQs/Chapter with Answers & Rationales Description: Master internal medicine with the only full-text test bank built from CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 (65th Edition). This digital product delivers comprehensive, exam-focused practice: all chapters covered, 20 NCLEX/HESI/USMLE-style MCQs per chapter, and verified evidence-based answers + rationales—designed to sharpen clinical reasoning, accelerate learning, and boost exam performance. Ideal for nursing, medical, and allied health students preparing for NCLEX, HESI, shelf exams, or board-style assessments. Why this test bank works: it maps directly to CURRENT’s trusted chapter content, translating complex pathophysiology and management guidance into high-yield, application-level questions that mirror real exam logic. Save study time with targeted practice, identify knowledge gaps with detailed rationales, and build durable diagnostic and management skills that transfer to clinical care. Key Features: Complete coverage: ALL chapters of CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 (65th Ed.). 20 clinically realistic MCQs per chapter (A–D format). Correct answers with concise, evidence-based rationales referenced to CURRENT content. Exam-style vignettes emphasizing application, analysis, and clinical judgment. Optimized for NCLEX, HESI, USMLE, shelf exams, and in-service board prep. Downloadable, printable digital format—ready for self-study or classroom integration. Time-saving study pathways and progressive difficulty to track improvement. Trust the global authority in internal medicine—practice smarter, score higher, and confidently apply clinical decision-making at test and bedside. Keywords: CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and Treatment 2026 test bank internal medicine MCQs 65th edition test bank NCLEX internal medicine questions HESI practice questions internal medicine USMLE-style internal medicine questions clinical reasoning question bank full textbook question bank Hashtags: #CURRENTMDT2026 #InternalMedicineMCQs #TestBank #NCLEXPrep #HESIPrep #USMLEPractice #ClinicalReasoning #65thEdition #MedicalEducation #BoardExamPrep

Show more Read less
Institution
Nclex
Module
Nclex











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Nclex
Module
Nclex

Document information

Uploaded on
November 3, 2025
Number of pages
695
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and
Treatment 2026
65th Edition


Author(s)Maxine A. Papadakis; Michael
W. Rabow; Kenneth R. McQuaid; Paul L.
Nadler; Erika Leemann Price



TEST BANK

Reference
Ch. 1 — Disease Prevention & Health Promotion — Overview
Question Stem
A 58-year-old man with a 30-pack-year smoking history asks
whether he should begin lung-cancer screening. Which criterion
most appropriately determines eligibility for low-dose CT
screening per CMDT guidance?

,Options
A. Age ≥50 with any tobacco exposure ≥10 pack-years
B. Age 50–80 and current smoker or quit ≤15 years with ≥20
pack-years
C. Age 55–80 and current smoker or quit ≤15 years with ≥30
pack-years
D. Age ≥60 and any history of tobacco use
Correct Answer
C
Rationales
• Correct (C): CMDT recommends low-dose CT screening for
adults 55–80 who are current smokers or who quit within
the past 15 years and have a 30+ pack-year history — this
balance of age, recent exposure, and cumulative exposure
optimizes benefit. Google Books+1
• A (incorrect): Age ≥50 with ≥10 pack-years is too
permissive and not the threshold CMDT endorses.
• B (incorrect): Lower pack-year threshold (20) is not the
standard CMDT screening cutoff.
• D (incorrect): Age ≥60 alone without pack-year threshold is
insufficient for eligibility.
Teaching Point
LDCT screening: age 55–80, current or quit ≤15 years, ≥30 pack-
years.

,Citation (Simplified APA)
Papadakis et al. (2026). CURRENT Medical Diagnosis &
Treatment 2026 (65th Ed.). Ch. 1. Google Books+1


2
Reference
Ch. 1 — Disease Prevention & Health Promotion —
Immunizations
Question Stem
A 70-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes asks which vaccine is
most strongly recommended annually to reduce influenza-
related complications. Which action is best?
Options
A. Give high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine every year
B. Give live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine once at age
70
C. Give inactivated influenza vaccine only if patient has chronic
pulmonary disease
D. Defer influenza vaccination until next clinic visit because she
is diabetic
Correct Answer
A
Rationales

, • Correct (A): CMDT recommends annual influenza
vaccination for older adults; high-dose inactivated
formulations provide better immunogenicity and are
preferred in older patients to reduce complications.
accessmedicine.mhmedical.com
• B (incorrect): Live intranasal vaccine is generally not
recommended for older adults or those with chronic
conditions.
• C (incorrect): Vaccination is recommended for all older
adults and those with diabetes — not restricted to
pulmonary disease.
• D (incorrect): Deferring increases risk; annual vaccination
should be given now.
Teaching Point
Older adults should receive annual inactivated (high-dose)
influenza vaccination.
Citation (Simplified APA)
Papadakis et al. (2026). CURRENT Medical Diagnosis &
Treatment 2026 (65th Ed.). Ch. 1.
accessmedicine.mhmedical.com


3
$35.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
estonnjoka

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
estonnjoka Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4
Member since
5 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
118
Last sold
2 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions