100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank (Ignatavicius 11th Edition) — Comprehensive NCLEX/HESI Review, 20 Questions/Chapter with Verified Rationales

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
349
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-10-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank (Ignatavicius 11th Edition) — Comprehensive NCLEX/HESI Review, 20 Questions/Chapter with Verified Rationales Description: Struggling with test anxiety or cramming last-minute med-surg facts? Build confidence with a trusted, exam-focused resource designed for real nursing success. This Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank—based on Ignatavicius 11th Edition—delivers mastery through practice, not memorization. Aligned with the 2025 NCLEX-RN Test Plan and HESI competencies, this comprehensive NCLEX Review contains 20 original NCLEX/HESI-style multiple-choice questions per chapter, covering pathophysiology, pharmacology, clinical judgment, patient safety, and interprofessional collaborative care. Each item is scenario-based when appropriate and paired with evidence-based, verified rationales written and peer-reviewed by experienced nurse educators to strengthen clinical reasoning and translate knowledge into safe bedside decisions. Why this resource works: • Complete coverage: 20 items per chapter provides systematic practice across the entire Ignatavicius 11th Edition. • Exam-aligned: Questions emphasize clinical judgment, prioritization, delegation, medication safety, and therapeutic reasoning—core NCLEX/HESI domains. • Verified rationales: Clear, evidence-based explanations show why options are correct or incorrect and teach test-wise thinking. • Practical design: Case-based stems, focused labs/ECGs, and medication scenarios mirror real-world med-surg care. • Flexible use: Ideal for solo study, group review, classroom quizzes, and instructor test-building. Who benefits: RN and BSN students preparing for NCLEX, MSN candidates refreshing clinical foundations, HESI test-takers, and nursing faculty seeking curriculum-aligned formative assessments. Outcomes you can expect: faster identification of knowledge gaps, improved prioritization under time pressure, and measurable confidence gains on exam day. This Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank (Ignatavicius 11th Edition) is a purposeful NCLEX Review toolkit with verified rationales that turn practice into proficiency. Includes an answer key, suggested study schedule, and instructor notes to streamline classroom use and maximize preparation efficiency. Start preparing smarter today—download instantly, integrate into your study plan, and transform study stress into exam confidence. Hashtags (10): [#NCLEX #NursingStudents #MedSurgNursing #HESIReview #Ignatavicius11thEdition #NursingSchool #RNExamPrep #TestBank #StudySmarter #NursingEducation] Keywords (20): [Medical Surgical Nursing Test Bank, Ignatavicius 11th Edition questions, NCLEX Med-Surg review, HESI practice questions, verified rationales, nursing exam prep, clinical judgment MCQs, RN study guide, medical surgical care review, evidence-based nursing test bank, Med-Surg chapter questions, NCLEX priority nursing questions, HESI MedSurg review, prioritized care test bank, nursing faculty test bank, pathophysiology practice questions, medication safety NCLEX, interprofessional collaborative care questions, exam-ready nursing questions, 20 questions per chapter test bank]

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Nclex
Vak
Nclex











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Nclex
Vak
Nclex

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 oktober 2025
Aantal pagina's
349
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Medical-Surgical Nursing: Concepts for Interprofessional
Collaborative Care (11th Ed.) — Unit I (Ch. 1–9).


Medical-Surgical Nursing
11th Edition
• Author(s)Donna D. Ignatavicius; Cherie R. Rebar; Nicole M.
Heimgartner




Item 1
Reference: Ch. 2: Clinical Judgment and Systems Thinking —
Clinical Judgment Model
Question Stem: A 68-year-old postop hip replacement patient
has sudden shortness of breath and oxygen saturation 86% on 2
L/min nasal cannula. Using clinical judgment (recognize-analyze-
respond), which action should the nurse perform first?
A. Increase oxygen to 4 L/min via nasal cannula.
B. Perform a focused respiratory assessment and call rapid
response.
C. Administer PRN opioid analgesic for pain and reassess.
D. Encourage deep breathing and incentive spirometry every
hour.
Correct Answer: B

,Rationales:
• Correct (B): Focused assessment and early escalation
identify life-threatening causes (e.g., PE, atelectasis) and
initiates timely team response; this follows the clinical
judgment cycle of recognizing and responding.
• Incorrect (A): Increasing oxygen without assessment can
mask deterioration and may be insufficient if immediate
intervention/transfer is needed.
• Incorrect (C): Opioids may worsen hypoventilation;
treating pain before assessment risks harm.
• Incorrect (D): Incentive spirometry is
preventive/therapeutic but too slow as the first action in
acute desaturation.
Teaching Point: Rapid assessment and escalation are priority
when patients have sudden hypoxia.
Citation: Ignatavicius, Rebar, & Heimgartner, 2024, Ch. 2:
Clinical Judgment and Systems Thinking


Item 2
Reference: Ch. 1: Overview of Professional Nursing Concepts —
Scope & Standards
Question Stem: A nurse is assigned four patients and must
delegate morning care tasks. Which task is best to assign to a
licensed practical nurse (LPN) on the team?

,A. Teach the newly diagnosed diabetic patient insulin injection
technique.
B. Perform and document a focused wound assessment for a
postoperative incision.
C. Administer scheduled subcutaneous insulin to a stable
patient.
D. Initiate discharge teaching and evaluate home safety for a
patient.
Correct Answer: C
Rationales:
• Correct (C): LPNs commonly administer scheduled
medications to stable patients under RN supervision; this is
appropriate delegation of a skilled, stable task.
• Incorrect (A): Teaching and competency evaluation are RN
responsibilities requiring assessment and evaluation.
• Incorrect (B): Wound assessment and documenting
changes that could affect plan of care require RN
assessment skill.
• Incorrect (D): Discharge teaching, complex teaching, and
home safety evaluation require RN judgment and holistic
assessment.
Teaching Point: Delegate tasks based on stability, complexity,
and scope of practice.

, Citation: Ignatavicius, Rebar, & Heimgartner, 2024, Ch. 1:
Overview of Professional Nursing Concepts


Item 3
Reference: Ch. 3: Overview of Health Concepts — Homeostasis
and Stress Response
Question Stem: A patient with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
reports palpitations, weight loss, and heat intolerance. Which
physiologic concept best explains the patient's increased
baseline metabolic rate?
A. Parasympathetic dominance causing increased digestion.
B. Excess thyroid hormone increasing cellular oxygen
consumption.
C. Decreased catecholamine sensitivity in peripheral tissues.
D. Upregulation of insulin receptors increasing glucose uptake.
Correct Answer: B
Rationales:
• Correct (B): Thyroid hormones increase basal metabolic
rate by upregulating cellular enzymes and increasing
oxygen consumption and heat production.
• Incorrect (A): Parasympathetic activity decreases
metabolic rate and promotes rest-and-digest; it does not
explain hypermetabolism.
$31.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
peterparks

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
peterparks Princeton
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
0
Lid sinds
5 maanden
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
112
Laatst verkocht
-

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen