1
CMY3701 | UPDATE|COMPREHENSIVE
MOST TESTED QUESTIONS AND
VERIFIED SOLUTIONS|GET IT 100%
ACCURATE!!
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES - (ANSWER)are those circumstances that cause
the offender to be punished more severely than they would normally be for a
specific crime. For example, conviction for the rape of a child would warrant a
more serious punishment than rape of an adult, because society views a child as
more vulnerable
and helpless (Hunter & Dantzker, 2002:3±32).
CLASSICAL CRIMINOLOGY - (ANSWER)as an approach to studying crime
emphasises the importance of free will and views a criminal act as one that had
been consciously carried out by its perpetrator; the perpetrator has rationally
weighed up the advantages and disadvantages of undertaking the action. The
main focus of classicist criminology is on the operation of the criminal justice
system. Classicists believe that, if this system operated in a consistent and
predictable fashion, it would eliminate crime (because those who committed
crime knew that they would not get away with it (Joyce, 2006:557)).
CRIMINAL EVENT DECISIONS - (ANSWER)are shorter processes that use more
limited information that relates mainly to the immediate circumstances and
situations (Cote,2002:292).
CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT - (ANSWER)refers to the processes through which
individuals initially choose to become involved in particular forms of crime, to
continue on this path, and then, later to desist from crime (Cote, 2002:29).
,2
LIMITED OR BOUNDED RATIONALITY - (ANSWER)is a term used to indicate that
even though individuals may make poor decisions, often based on incomplete or
simply inadequate information, they are nonetheless rational actors (Newburn,
2007:949).
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES - (ANSWER)are those circumstances that would
result in a more lenient sentence that would normally be imposed for a similar
crime. A first- time offender would normally receive a lighter sentence than
someone with a long criminal history (Hunter & Dantzker, 2002:32).
NEO-CLASSICAL SCHOOL - (ANSWER)is a body of theory that contends that
scientific criminology (positivism), with its belief in rehabilitation, is invalid.
According to this school of thought, society should return to the principles of
classical criminology and should deal with crime by concentrating on the
administration of justice and the punishment of offenders (Empey, Stafford &
Hay, 1999:418).
ROUTINE ACTIVITIES THEORY - (ANSWER)is theory (associated primarily with
Marcus Felson) which suggests that for crime to occur three factors must be
present, namely a motivated offender; a suitable victim; and the absence of
capable guardians (Newburn, 2007:952).
RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY - (ANSWER)is a theory which emphasises the
importance of rationality in human action, even if this is limited (bounded). It
emphasises the
decision-making processes involved in the choices made by offenders (Newburn,
2007:95).
,3
SOCIAL CONTRACT - (ANSWER)is when an individual is bound to society only by
his or her
own consent, and society is therefore responsible to him or her (Hunter &
Dantzker,2002:29).
Burke (2005:28±29) identifies the following central attributes of the classical and
neoclassical schools, which laid down the foundations of the rational actor model:
- (ANSWER). A fundamental concentration on the criminal law and the legal
definition of crime.
. The central concept that the punishment should fit the crime rather than the
offender.
. The doctrine of free will, according to which all people are free to choose their
actions. From this perspective, it is assumed that there is nothing ''different'' or
''special'' about offenders that differentiate them from other people.
. The use of non-scientific methodology coupled with a lack of empirical research.
neoclassicists, - (ANSWER)= a person is still accountable for his or her actions, but
with certain minor reservations
= it is acknowledged that the offender's past history and present situation both
influence the likelihood of reform
= sane adults were still considered fully responsible for their actions, and all
equally capable of either criminal or law-abiding behaviour.
= that children (and in some circumstances the elderly) were less capable of
exercising free choice and were therefore less responsible for their actions
= insane and ``feeble-minded'' might be even less responsible
, 4
= admitted into the courts for the first time non-legal "experts''
including doctors, psychiatrists and, later, social workers.
= purpose of this intervention was to determine the extent to which offenders
were responsible for their actions.
= outcome was that sentences became more individualised, depending on the
perceived degree of responsibility on the part of the offender and on whether
there were mitigating circumstances
elements that increase or decrease the likelihood that persons will be victims
of personal (direct contact) or property crime are: - (ANSWER)= The availability of
suitable targets in the form of a person or property,
= The absence of capable guardians, such as police, homeowners, neighbours,
friends, and relatives.
= The presence of motivated offenders, such as young males, drug users and
unemployed adults.
Suitability of target is dependent on 4 criteria, VIVA - (ANSWER)(+) Value:
calculated from the subjective rational perspective of the offender,
what is the target worth?
(+) Inertia: the extent to which the article or target can be realistically removed,
taken, robbed or moved
(+) Visibility: how visible the target is to the offender?
(+) Accessibility: how easy it is to gain access to the target?
CMY3701 | UPDATE|COMPREHENSIVE
MOST TESTED QUESTIONS AND
VERIFIED SOLUTIONS|GET IT 100%
ACCURATE!!
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES - (ANSWER)are those circumstances that cause
the offender to be punished more severely than they would normally be for a
specific crime. For example, conviction for the rape of a child would warrant a
more serious punishment than rape of an adult, because society views a child as
more vulnerable
and helpless (Hunter & Dantzker, 2002:3±32).
CLASSICAL CRIMINOLOGY - (ANSWER)as an approach to studying crime
emphasises the importance of free will and views a criminal act as one that had
been consciously carried out by its perpetrator; the perpetrator has rationally
weighed up the advantages and disadvantages of undertaking the action. The
main focus of classicist criminology is on the operation of the criminal justice
system. Classicists believe that, if this system operated in a consistent and
predictable fashion, it would eliminate crime (because those who committed
crime knew that they would not get away with it (Joyce, 2006:557)).
CRIMINAL EVENT DECISIONS - (ANSWER)are shorter processes that use more
limited information that relates mainly to the immediate circumstances and
situations (Cote,2002:292).
CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT - (ANSWER)refers to the processes through which
individuals initially choose to become involved in particular forms of crime, to
continue on this path, and then, later to desist from crime (Cote, 2002:29).
,2
LIMITED OR BOUNDED RATIONALITY - (ANSWER)is a term used to indicate that
even though individuals may make poor decisions, often based on incomplete or
simply inadequate information, they are nonetheless rational actors (Newburn,
2007:949).
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES - (ANSWER)are those circumstances that would
result in a more lenient sentence that would normally be imposed for a similar
crime. A first- time offender would normally receive a lighter sentence than
someone with a long criminal history (Hunter & Dantzker, 2002:32).
NEO-CLASSICAL SCHOOL - (ANSWER)is a body of theory that contends that
scientific criminology (positivism), with its belief in rehabilitation, is invalid.
According to this school of thought, society should return to the principles of
classical criminology and should deal with crime by concentrating on the
administration of justice and the punishment of offenders (Empey, Stafford &
Hay, 1999:418).
ROUTINE ACTIVITIES THEORY - (ANSWER)is theory (associated primarily with
Marcus Felson) which suggests that for crime to occur three factors must be
present, namely a motivated offender; a suitable victim; and the absence of
capable guardians (Newburn, 2007:952).
RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY - (ANSWER)is a theory which emphasises the
importance of rationality in human action, even if this is limited (bounded). It
emphasises the
decision-making processes involved in the choices made by offenders (Newburn,
2007:95).
,3
SOCIAL CONTRACT - (ANSWER)is when an individual is bound to society only by
his or her
own consent, and society is therefore responsible to him or her (Hunter &
Dantzker,2002:29).
Burke (2005:28±29) identifies the following central attributes of the classical and
neoclassical schools, which laid down the foundations of the rational actor model:
- (ANSWER). A fundamental concentration on the criminal law and the legal
definition of crime.
. The central concept that the punishment should fit the crime rather than the
offender.
. The doctrine of free will, according to which all people are free to choose their
actions. From this perspective, it is assumed that there is nothing ''different'' or
''special'' about offenders that differentiate them from other people.
. The use of non-scientific methodology coupled with a lack of empirical research.
neoclassicists, - (ANSWER)= a person is still accountable for his or her actions, but
with certain minor reservations
= it is acknowledged that the offender's past history and present situation both
influence the likelihood of reform
= sane adults were still considered fully responsible for their actions, and all
equally capable of either criminal or law-abiding behaviour.
= that children (and in some circumstances the elderly) were less capable of
exercising free choice and were therefore less responsible for their actions
= insane and ``feeble-minded'' might be even less responsible
, 4
= admitted into the courts for the first time non-legal "experts''
including doctors, psychiatrists and, later, social workers.
= purpose of this intervention was to determine the extent to which offenders
were responsible for their actions.
= outcome was that sentences became more individualised, depending on the
perceived degree of responsibility on the part of the offender and on whether
there were mitigating circumstances
elements that increase or decrease the likelihood that persons will be victims
of personal (direct contact) or property crime are: - (ANSWER)= The availability of
suitable targets in the form of a person or property,
= The absence of capable guardians, such as police, homeowners, neighbours,
friends, and relatives.
= The presence of motivated offenders, such as young males, drug users and
unemployed adults.
Suitability of target is dependent on 4 criteria, VIVA - (ANSWER)(+) Value:
calculated from the subjective rational perspective of the offender,
what is the target worth?
(+) Inertia: the extent to which the article or target can be realistically removed,
taken, robbed or moved
(+) Visibility: how visible the target is to the offender?
(+) Accessibility: how easy it is to gain access to the target?
