CIC2601 Assignment 5
PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 10 October
2025
[Document subtitle]
[School]
[Course title]
,CIC2601 Assignment 5 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 10 October 2025
Course
Computer Integration in the classroom (CIC2601)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
Teachers Discovering Computers
CIC2601 Assignment 5 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 10 October 2025; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Selection & Justification of Digital Tools Digital tools are highly relevant, well-justified, and
strongly support learning objectives. Digital tools are appropriate and justified, though
reasoning may need more depth. Digital tools are somewhat relevant but lack strong
justification. Digital tools are irrelevant, poorly chosen, or not justified. No selection &
justification of digital tools Alignment with Learning Objectives Lesson plan clearly aligns digital
tools and activities with well-defined learning objectives. Most activities and tools align with
learning objectives, with minor inconsistencies. Some connection between tools and objectives,
but alignment is weak. No clear alignment between tools, activities, and learning objectives. No
alignment with learning objectives Integration of Digital Technologies in Pedagogy Digital
technologies are seamlessly integrated with innovative and effective teaching strategies. Digital
technologies are integrated appropriately but may lack innovation. Some integration is present
but lacks depth or clear explanation. Weak or no integration of digital technologies in teaching
methodology. No integration of digital technologies in pedagogy Enhancement of Student
Engagement & Learning Strong explanation of how digital tools enhance engagement,
interaction, and deeper learning. Provides reasonable justification for engagement but lacks
strong examples. Mentions engagement but lacks depth or supporting evidence. Does not
clearly explain how digital tools enhance engagement or learning. No enhancement of student
engagement & learning 5 Consideration of Challenges & Solutions Thoughtfully considers
potential challenges and provides clear, practical solutions. Identifies key challenges with some
possible solutions. Mentions challenges but lacks meaningful solutions. No consideration of
challenges or solutions. No consideration of challenges & solutions Selection & Description of
Digital Tool Clearly identifies and describes a relevant digital tool, demonstrating a deep
understanding of its features and capabilities. Identifies and describes a relevant digital tool
with some details about its features. Identifies a digital tool but lacks clarity in its description or
misses key features. The digital tool is unclear, not well described, or irrelevant to classroom
, use. No selection & description of digital tool Practical Implementation in the Classroom
Provides a detailed, realistic, and innovative plan for implementing the tool, with specific
strategies tailored to classroom use. Provides a clear plan for implementation with some
relevant strategies, though details may be lacking. Provides a general idea of implementation
but lacks depth or specificity. The implementation plan is unclear, unrealistic, or lacks
connection to classroom use. No practical Implementation in the Classroom Enhancement of
Student Engagement Clearly explains how the tool will actively engage students, using strong
examples or research-based justification. Explains how the tool enhances engagement but with
limited examples or justification. Mentions engagement but lacks clarity or supporting
examples. Does not explain how the tool enhances engagement, or the explanation is weak. No
Enhancement of Student Engagement Impact on Learning Outcomes Effectively links the digital
tool to specific, measurable Links the tool to learning outcomes, though Mentions learning
outcomes but lacks a strong Fails to address learning outcomes or No Impact on Learning
Outcomes 7 learning outcomes with clear reasoning. reasoning may not be fully developed.
connection to the tool’s impact. lacks coherence in explanation. Critical Reflection, Challenges,
Clarity & Organization Demonstrates thoughtful reflection on potential challenges with practical
solutions. Writing is clear, well-structured, and logically organized with minimal errors. Identifies
relevant challenges and offers partial solutions. Response is mostly clear and organized, with
minor lapses in flow or clarity. Mentions challenges but provides limited or superficial solutions.
Organization and clarity are inconsistent, with frequent errors or unclear explanations.
Challenges are acknowledged but not meaningfully addressed. Writing lacks structure and
clarity, with frequent errors that hinder understanding. No Critical Reflection, Challenges, Clarity
& Organization Project Design and Concept Highly creative, clear, engaging; promotes
collaboration with innovative digital interaction; aligns well with course content. Clear and
practical; promotes collaboration using standard tools; aligns with course content. Clear concept
but weak collaboration; basic tools; limited engagement strategy. Unclear or poorly defined;
minimal collaboration; weak alignment with course content. No project design and concept
Integration of Digital Tools/Platforms Tools are well-suited, enhance collaboration and learning;
selection is strategic and thoughtful. Appropriate tools that support collaboration; rationale
mostly clear. Functional but basic tools; weak rationale for selection. Irrelevant or poorly
selected tools; little or no rationale; ineffective support. No integration of digital tools/platforms
Collaborative Learning Strategy Detailed strategy; encourages meaningful Strategy present but
may not ensure equal Basic collaboration; limited No clear strategy; minimal or poorly thought-
No collaborative learning strategy 9 interaction and balanced roles. participation; needs more
clarity. guidance; roles not well defined. out collaboration. Assessment Plan Well-detailed;
evaluates individual and group work; aligns with goals; provides meaningful feedback. Clear
plan: evaluates contributions but lacks depth or clarity in areas. Vague or incomplete; unclear
individual assessment; weak alignment. No clear plan; fails to assess individual/group work;
PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 10 October
2025
[Document subtitle]
[School]
[Course title]
,CIC2601 Assignment 5 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 10 October 2025
Course
Computer Integration in the classroom (CIC2601)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
Teachers Discovering Computers
CIC2601 Assignment 5 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 10 October 2025; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Selection & Justification of Digital Tools Digital tools are highly relevant, well-justified, and
strongly support learning objectives. Digital tools are appropriate and justified, though
reasoning may need more depth. Digital tools are somewhat relevant but lack strong
justification. Digital tools are irrelevant, poorly chosen, or not justified. No selection &
justification of digital tools Alignment with Learning Objectives Lesson plan clearly aligns digital
tools and activities with well-defined learning objectives. Most activities and tools align with
learning objectives, with minor inconsistencies. Some connection between tools and objectives,
but alignment is weak. No clear alignment between tools, activities, and learning objectives. No
alignment with learning objectives Integration of Digital Technologies in Pedagogy Digital
technologies are seamlessly integrated with innovative and effective teaching strategies. Digital
technologies are integrated appropriately but may lack innovation. Some integration is present
but lacks depth or clear explanation. Weak or no integration of digital technologies in teaching
methodology. No integration of digital technologies in pedagogy Enhancement of Student
Engagement & Learning Strong explanation of how digital tools enhance engagement,
interaction, and deeper learning. Provides reasonable justification for engagement but lacks
strong examples. Mentions engagement but lacks depth or supporting evidence. Does not
clearly explain how digital tools enhance engagement or learning. No enhancement of student
engagement & learning 5 Consideration of Challenges & Solutions Thoughtfully considers
potential challenges and provides clear, practical solutions. Identifies key challenges with some
possible solutions. Mentions challenges but lacks meaningful solutions. No consideration of
challenges or solutions. No consideration of challenges & solutions Selection & Description of
Digital Tool Clearly identifies and describes a relevant digital tool, demonstrating a deep
understanding of its features and capabilities. Identifies and describes a relevant digital tool
with some details about its features. Identifies a digital tool but lacks clarity in its description or
misses key features. The digital tool is unclear, not well described, or irrelevant to classroom
, use. No selection & description of digital tool Practical Implementation in the Classroom
Provides a detailed, realistic, and innovative plan for implementing the tool, with specific
strategies tailored to classroom use. Provides a clear plan for implementation with some
relevant strategies, though details may be lacking. Provides a general idea of implementation
but lacks depth or specificity. The implementation plan is unclear, unrealistic, or lacks
connection to classroom use. No practical Implementation in the Classroom Enhancement of
Student Engagement Clearly explains how the tool will actively engage students, using strong
examples or research-based justification. Explains how the tool enhances engagement but with
limited examples or justification. Mentions engagement but lacks clarity or supporting
examples. Does not explain how the tool enhances engagement, or the explanation is weak. No
Enhancement of Student Engagement Impact on Learning Outcomes Effectively links the digital
tool to specific, measurable Links the tool to learning outcomes, though Mentions learning
outcomes but lacks a strong Fails to address learning outcomes or No Impact on Learning
Outcomes 7 learning outcomes with clear reasoning. reasoning may not be fully developed.
connection to the tool’s impact. lacks coherence in explanation. Critical Reflection, Challenges,
Clarity & Organization Demonstrates thoughtful reflection on potential challenges with practical
solutions. Writing is clear, well-structured, and logically organized with minimal errors. Identifies
relevant challenges and offers partial solutions. Response is mostly clear and organized, with
minor lapses in flow or clarity. Mentions challenges but provides limited or superficial solutions.
Organization and clarity are inconsistent, with frequent errors or unclear explanations.
Challenges are acknowledged but not meaningfully addressed. Writing lacks structure and
clarity, with frequent errors that hinder understanding. No Critical Reflection, Challenges, Clarity
& Organization Project Design and Concept Highly creative, clear, engaging; promotes
collaboration with innovative digital interaction; aligns well with course content. Clear and
practical; promotes collaboration using standard tools; aligns with course content. Clear concept
but weak collaboration; basic tools; limited engagement strategy. Unclear or poorly defined;
minimal collaboration; weak alignment with course content. No project design and concept
Integration of Digital Tools/Platforms Tools are well-suited, enhance collaboration and learning;
selection is strategic and thoughtful. Appropriate tools that support collaboration; rationale
mostly clear. Functional but basic tools; weak rationale for selection. Irrelevant or poorly
selected tools; little or no rationale; ineffective support. No integration of digital tools/platforms
Collaborative Learning Strategy Detailed strategy; encourages meaningful Strategy present but
may not ensure equal Basic collaboration; limited No clear strategy; minimal or poorly thought-
No collaborative learning strategy 9 interaction and balanced roles. participation; needs more
clarity. guidance; roles not well defined. out collaboration. Assessment Plan Well-detailed;
evaluates individual and group work; aligns with goals; provides meaningful feedback. Clear
plan: evaluates contributions but lacks depth or clarity in areas. Vague or incomplete; unclear
individual assessment; weak alignment. No clear plan; fails to assess individual/group work;
