2 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester
2 2025 - DUE 18
September 2025
For assistance contact
Email:
, Question 1
Assume that copyright subsists in the recording and the broadcast comprising the aired radio
interview. Who is/are the likely authors and owners of the copyright in these works? [8]
In South African copyright law, the author of a sound recording is the person who makes the
recording, while the author of a broadcast is the person or organisation responsible for
transmitting it to the public. The Copyright Act 98 of 1978 provides that ownership of copyright
initially vests in the author unless the work is made in the course of employment, in which case
the employer owns the copyright. In this case, the recording of the interview was made by the
employees of the radio station, in the course of their employment. Therefore, the radio station
will be the author and copyright owner of the sound recording. Similarly, the radio station is also
responsible for transmitting the broadcast, and is therefore the author and owner of copyright in
the broadcast itself. Ryno, who gave the interview, is not the author of either the sound recording
or the broadcast, although his contribution as an interviewee is recognised as a performance.
Accordingly, the most likely authors and owners of the recording and broadcast are the radio
station itself.
Question 2
The radio station phones The Every Day to demand that Michel stop infringing the copyright in
their content. Is this a valid demand?
Copyright protects original works against unauthorised reproduction. However, South African
copyright law also provides for fair dealing exceptions, including for reporting current events in
a newspaper, magazine or broadcast, provided that the source is acknowledged. In this case,
Michel reproduced parts of Ryno’s interview verbatim, but only short extracts, and she clearly
identified both the radio station and Ryno as the sources. She also transformed the material by
adding her own introduction, linking text, conclusion, and headline. Moreover, she included a
hyperlink to the original broadcast. This falls within fair dealing for purposes of news reporting,
with proper attribution. Therefore, while the radio station may feel its content was used, the
demand to stop publication is not legally valid because Michel’s use constitutes lawful fair
dealing.